Sentences with phrase «court injuries award»

Not exact matches

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

The tweet encourages BNP supporters and other fascist groups to attend the private home of the couple, who were awarded # 1,800 each at Reading County Court for «injury to feelings».

Compensatory (but not punitive) damages awarded in court for physical injury or physical sickness

The liability portion of homeowners insurance covers you against lawsuits for bodily injury or property damage that you or family members or pets cause to other people, as well as court costs incurred and damages awarded.

«The issue the court will address is whether the award against the tobacco maker was so disproportionate to the injury as to violate the constitutional guarantee of due process.

July 4, 2011 - In this maximum injury claim for pain and suffering (Bransford v. Yilmazcan, 2010 BCCA 271) despite The Jury awarding a claimant $ 385,000.00 for pain and suffering and the Trial Judge reducing the amount to $ 327,350.00, the Court of... Continue reading →

I have acted on a number of serious injury cases where I have made an application to the court that have been granted for an award of provisional damages.

Issue: In personal injury cases should a trial judge be allowed to courageously correct mistakes made by the jury which lead to unreasonably high court awards?

Wormell v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, 2010 BCSC 1028 July 22, 2010 - The injury claimant obtained a court award of $ 570,288.71 for serious personal injuries suffered in an accident.

In a stunning personal injury decision the Supreme Court has reduced a damage award for a brain injured 27 year old claimant.

Typically, out - of - court settlements will reflect the average jury awards in the area where your injury occurred.

An amount of money that a Plaintiff can be awarded by a Court in an ICBC injury claim.

A lower award was made to a 19 year old claimant Laura Tennant who pursued an action against Direct Line Insurance in Kilmarnock Sheriff Court (SLT 16/7/10 page 71) the sheriff awarded # 2000 for pain and suffering for an injury to neck with pain radiating to the arms, back and shoulders and a full recovery after 13 months.

In Ontario, our courts award compensation for personal injury based on the principle of loss.

Similarly, if you can not prove that the person against whom you brought a personal injury lawsuit (the «defendant») was negligent, you will not be awarded money damages by a court.

Reasons for judgment were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Mariano v. Campbell) awarding a Plaintiff just over $ 115,000 as a result of injuries sustained in a 2006 rear end collision.

In all of the circumstances, and discounting the claimant's evidence to account for what the court believed to be his own exaggerated and dishonest description of some of his injuries, the judge did not see fit to award anything more than nominal damages in this case.

The proof of that future loss is sometimes a difficult task and usually involves medical assessment and / or actuarial assessment); d. past care cost (if you have spend money for your medical care that was made medically necessary owing to ICBC motor vehicle accident injury then you can expect to collect a sum of money equivalent to those reasonable treatment and medication costs please ensure that you keep the receipts and seek prior medical approval to eventually prove this loss); e. future care costs (if you will suffer repeated medical expenses in the future owing to your motor vehicle accident ICBC injury claim then you can collect a sum of money equivalent to that future loss); f. out of pocket expenses or «special damages» (if you suffer out of pocket expenses like for travel to / from medical appointments, cab fare, parking, etc, then this is also recoverable by you but again — keep track of these expenses in a log and keep a receipt book for later proof of this loss); g. legal costs (sum of the legal costs associated with advancing your injury claim are recoverable as the court system recognizes that often legal experts, lawyers and their agents are a necessary part of the process); h. other categories of damages: not discussed here are other categories of damages like «in trust claims» made largely for those who relatives who take care of you while you are recovering from your injuries or things like «loss of ability to enter an economically interdependent relationship» which might be awarded to a seriously disfigured potential spouse for his / her unlikely ability to become married in the future.

In Empire Investments Corp. v. Pontes, the court held that for «gender - based discrimination and sexual harassment [John] Pontes must pay the complainant the maximum possible award under the code of $ 10,000 for injury to feelings, dignity, and self - respect.»

If hired, we'll use the same grit and determination we employ in Supreme Court cases to secure the best possible settlement or award for your personal injury case.

In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court made a number of statements that are likely to lead to uncertainty regarding the amount that might be awarded by the Human Rights Tribunal in the future for injury to dignity, feelings and self - respect.

Judicial review of injury to dignity awards is not to be approached in the same manner as a quantum appeal in a personal injury case, where the Courts consider whether the award «was a wholly erroneous estimate of the loss by comparison to the range established by the cases».

Jury trial for personal injury claim, acting for the defendant: Gehlen v. Rana, 2009, BC Supreme Court, unreported — Court awarded damages less than amount offered

It noted that a trial judge's discretion is not unlimited, that there was no authority for awarding damages under the CSPA to class plaintiffs who had suffered no injury, and that the lower courts ignored the clear distinction in the CSPA between the kinds of damages available in an individual action and the actual damages available in a class action.

and also that, given the Plaintiff's age and injuries, that he would have «a difficult time finding work if his (current) job ended `, As a result of this the court awarded $ 70,000 for loss of future earnings / loss of earning capacity.

McLeish notably represented Katherine - Paige MacNeil, who suffered catastrophic injuries in an auto accident and was awarded an unprecedented $ 18.4 million by Ontario's Superior Court in 2009.

The Court of Appeal held that the 10 % uplift should apply both to the personal injury and injury to feelings awards.

A cyclist who was forced to quit his job due to life changing injuries has been awarded # 100,000 in compensation in an out of court settlement.

The Court of Appeal has held that the 10 % increase in certain types of awards in county courts should also apply to awards in the employment tribunal for injury to feelings and personal injury.

Baffled, the Court was forced to award special costs after ICBC settled a personal injury case yet refused to pay costs.

If you suspect that someone else is to blame for your injuries, contact a personal injury lawyer who can evaluate your case and educate you on lawsuits, settlements and court awards.

In 1979 the Supreme Court of Canada established an arbitrary limit of $ 100,000 that could be awarded for the most serious and devastating of injuries.

In this personal injury case involving two motor accidents occurring 6 months apart (Wang v. Dhaliwal, 2014 BCSC 1662) the court awarded two set of legal costs totaling $ 13,000 in addition to the $ 59,000 out of court settlement.

Even if the tort had been negligence, the Court could have given an award of damages that would at least give some recognition of Mr. J's injuries.

The Court Appeal has made it clear in this personal injury case that an award for loss of future earning capacity reflects the exercise of judgment framed by clearly articulated factual findings.

Despite this, we were able to persuade the court to award Ryan $ 90,000.00 for his loss of future earning capacity by proving that there was a reasonable possibility that Ryan's career would be cut short as a result of his injuries at some point in the future.

Although a trial court may grant remittitur on the grounds that the award is disproportionate to the injuries suffered, courts have specifically rejected comparing damage awards as a means of measuring excessiveness.

In order for compensation to be awarded by the court, sufficient evidence must be put forth by the victim that shows the personal injuries sustained were a result of negligence by the defendant.

Currently, Ontarians who receive benefits under the Ontario Works program are allowed to keep only $ 25,000 of their total court - awarded compensation for pain and suffering when they win personal injury cases, even if the case arises out of sexual assault.

In Raptis v. Chalabiani, 2017 BCSC 1548, the Court awarded the Plaintiff $ 584,560 for injuries sustained in a December 2009 motor vehicle accident, which substantially exceeded ICBC's final offer of $ 364,243 before trial.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, addressing whether a Plaintiff's life expectancy should influence the non-pecuniary damages awarded in a personal injury claim.

One thing you should keep in mind when considering a personal injury lawsuit is whether you will actually be able to recover the damages awarded to you by a court.

The Court awarded our client $ 683,810 for injuries sustained in a 2011 motor vehicle accident, which substantially exceeded the insurance company's final offer of $ 280,000 before trial.

The issue before the Superior Court will be whether the Tribunal was right to refuse to award damages for injury to dignity.

Jurors in a state court have awarded Kamie Kendall Rees $ 1,587,928 in her Accutane injury lawsuit against drug maker Hoffman La Roche Inc..

Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, awarding damages for a rather unique injury, a ruptured bicep tendon.

Indeed, the firm's track record so far in 2016 is proving similar to previous years, in that the firm has already secured what will undoubtedly be one of the year's top verdicts — a $ 29.8 million award by a Hampden Superior Court jury for an 11 - year - old girl who suffered a devastating brain injury at birth.

Few personal injury cases result in punitive damage awards, and there may need to be a compensatory award before the court or jury can consider a punitive damage award.

In University of British Columbia v. Kelly, 2015 BCSC 1731, the Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision and the wage loss damages but reduced the award for injury to dignity.

Award - winning San Diego personal injury attorney John Gomez and his associates have appeared before judges and juries in both state and federal courts all over the country, and have delivered extraordinary results time and time again.