Sentences with phrase «court on certain issues»

China's Supreme People's Court («SPC») recently issued two pieces of judicial interpretations, namely, the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Related...

Not exact matches

On the same date, the Court also issued an order (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedings.

I am of the thinking that on the very day Brexit comes into effect, and except where it has formally been agreed during the negotiations on certain issues and matters to benefit both the UK and the EU, the UK should no longer be subjected to comply or obey any standing Laws passed before and later by the EU court of justuce after Brexit has come into effect.

I am of the thinking that on the very day Brexit comes to effect, and except where it has been formally agreed during the Brexit negotiations on certain issues and matters to the benefit of both the UK and the EU, the UK should no longer be subjected to comply or obey any standing Laws passed or passed after Brexit by the EU court of justice.

My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a coucourt in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a couCourt that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?

In an address to the conservative Federalist Society, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito defended his stance on the issue by arguing, «Surely the idea that the First Amendment protects only certain privileged voices should be disturbing to anybody who believes in free speech.»

There is a suit before the High Court requesting for certain details of the transaction; a Petition before CHRAJ on conflict of interest issues; a suit before the Supreme Court requesting clarification on whether the Attorney - General can defend the Minister for Finance in a conflict of interest matter; a Petition before the United States Security & Exchange Commission; and a Whistleblower Complaint lodged with the Regulator in Luxemburg (Commission de Surveillance de Secteur Financier).

After an extra-ordinary General Meeting of the Assembly, held at Rockview Hotel in Abuja, on the issue of Jonathan's eligibility to contest in 2015, top officials of the group regretted that even though the court had put to rest the issue of eligibility, «certain elements from the Northern part of the country, including Governor Babangida Aliyu of Niger State, have since introduced a new dimension to it, saying that Jonathan signed a secret agreement to do a single tenure

When these court rituals were available in cheap printed forms, the housewife was offered the chance to orchestrate a type of theater that could push on and debate certain issues of the day.

While the client may be able to spend more time on their case, an attorney brings a comfort level to any number of issues that will arise out of a court case, such as making certain pleadings are correct and appearing in court.

I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so on.

Applying the Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, the Court noted that «subject to certain well - known exceptions, the general rule is that when an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.»

[12] On appeal before this Court, Beaver took no issue with certain factual underpinnings of the injunction, namely that apart from the agent issue, he had been practicing law in contravention of both his undertakings and the Act.

Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's claims against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).

On May 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied a group of Nortel's bondholders leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal's previous ruling that Nortel's bondholders were not entitled to US$ 1.6 billion in post-filing interest on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»On May 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied a group of Nortel's bondholders leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal's previous ruling that Nortel's bondholders were not entitled to US$ 1.6 billion in post-filing interest on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»).

In the present case, it is common ground, that the amount of the public contract at issue in the main proceedings amounts to EUR 85,000, which is considerably below the thresholds for application laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24... On the other hand, in its reference for a preliminary ruling, the referring court has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adcourt has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adCourt to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adCourt finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis added).

On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision rejecting certain procedures adopted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) limiting a patent owner's ability to amend claims during Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act.

In a decision issued in October 2016 (Fournier c. R), the Superior Court of Québec established that, in certain circumstances, an accusation of manslaughter by means of an unlawful act under s. 222 (5) a) of the Criminal Code can be based on a breach of provincial health and safety legislation.

Couples in dispute on certain minor issues relating to parenting time, access schedules, the management of a child's health care, religious and educational instruction, and general communication between parents, can be referred by a court to a Parenting Coordinator who can assist with the resolution.

Pursuant to EU law, national courts may not make determinations which conflict with European Commission decisions on certain EU competition law issues.

In addition, the Competition Act 1998 (as amended) provides that findings of fact made by the CMA during the course of an investigation (which have not been appealed, or which have been confirmed on appeal) which are relevant to an issue arising in certain competition law proceedings before the High Court (or the CAT) are binding on the parties to those proceedings, unless the court (or the CAT) orders otherCourt (or the CAT) are binding on the parties to those proceedings, unless the court (or the CAT) orders othercourt (or the CAT) orders otherwise.

The trial court went on to identify additional issues, including the fact that many class members would not be able to state certain claims if they had not attempted to sell their homes, and there were no putative class representative plaintiffs for many of the mobilehome parks.

On January 6th, 2016, different media outlets reported that a certain number of federal courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada, were contesting the issue of a decree (2015 - 1071) stating that procurement for government IT services now needs to go through Shared Services Canada.

While the Saskatchewan decision certain gives some support TTC employees» argument, the outcome of any legal challenge will ultimately depend on a court's analysis of the specific legislation at issue.

Earlier this week, an American court issued a decision on a topic that is all but certain to come up for discussion in the weeks after October 19: the ballot selfie, and the attempts ban it.

Although I do not think it necessary to decide today issues that are not even remotely before us, it does seem to me that a court could find simple analytically sound distinctions between certain private, consensual sexual conduct, on the one hand, and adultery and incest (the only two vaguely specific «sexual crimes» to which the majority points, ante at 196), on the other.

Proceeding, however, on certain practice guidelines44, and taking into account causes bearing on the same question which were already lodged in the High Court, the Court upheld a preliminary objection, and declined to issue an advisory opinion.

The length and content of these courses is entirely based on the requirements of your state or the court issuing the court, but they are usually mandated by a certain time frame in which they should be taken, or word counts in the course itself.

Once you've been issued a traffic citation in Sumter County, Florida, you have a deadline before you must complete certain steps to avoid points on your license or going to court.

Also, FinCen regulations only take affect at certain dollar amounts; you can also try to get even further clarification from the Treasury yourself, because on this matter it doesn't matter what kind of legal counsel you ask, nobody knows all the semantics until an issue comes up that is actually decided in the courts.

In this way, unlike mediation, the inability to reach agreement on a certain issue is not seen as a failure, with the emotional response of rejection then being manifested in the form of heated court proceedings; rather, it is an opportunity to put the time and effort into finding a solution that best takes into account the needs of both parties.

In legal terms, a stipulation means there's no need for the court to rule on a certain issue, because the parties to the lawsuit already agree on it.

In legal terms, a stipulation means there's no need for the court to rule on a certain issue, because the parties to...

If your spouse files a response but you can't agree on certain issues, the court proceeds to trial on these issues.

A court's legal authority to hear a case, and issue enforceable orders and judgments within a particular geographic area and / or rule on certain types of legal cases.

The material presented on PAS in the legal arena is devoted to what attorneys and judges have to say about PAS, which can be a key issue in certain depend ency and criminal proceedings, as well as in family law court.