Sentences with phrase «court opinion giving»

The 55 counts of misconduct arise out of Fisher's «representation» of 10 different clients, and his alleged naughtiness appears to follow a pattern, according to the Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion giving him the boot:

Not exact matches

This Court was specifically mandated to «proceed and act and give relief on principles and rules which, in the opinion of the said Court, shall be as nearly as may be conformable to the principles and rules on which the ecclesiastical courts of Ireland have heretofore acted and given relief» [and] the [Irish] Constitution has inherited and amended this former jurisprudence in matrimonial matters.

«Mr. Jeffs, although presumed innocent, has now been incarcerated for more than four years on charges that, given the [Utah] supreme court's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mcourt's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mCourt earlier this month.

But in keeping with Eugene V. Rostow's characterization of the contemporary Supreme Court as a «vital national seminar,» it is worth noting that the original charge to the Court was only that it render an aye or a nay.44 It quickly began handing down written opinions also, however, and under Marshall began the practice of trying for a single majority opinion, which gave «judicial pronouncements a forceful unity they had formerly lacked.

Unless we have a Supreme Court judge here on the forum, I'm not sure how anyone here could give an opinion that wouldn't be merely argumentative and reflect but his personal opinion.

Given various policy options, this line of thought asserts, military force stands alongside many competing actions as but one policy option among many, whether economic sanctions, political incentives, alliance building, political pressure, or shame in the court of public opinion.

The statement said while Ogun «was under the siege of violence and politically - motivated killings» during OGD's reign as governor, Kashamu «fights his political battles in the court of law and public opinion using his God - given resources.»

Onondaga County District Attorney Bill Fitzpatrick echoed Graf's opinion, arguing that sending kids to family court would not leave prosecutors with first discretion over handling a case, and could give kids a «pass» on criminal behavior.

Fortunately, the timing of the Supreme Court opinion should give Florida some breathing room.

Grant Shapps said «it was clear she did something wrong in the court of public opinion», but declined to give his own view about whether she had done anything wrong, when asked by Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics.

Samuel Casey, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement: «We are disappointed by the Court of Appeals decision and, given the reasoning in the two concurring opinions, we are evaluating whether and on what grounds our clients will be seeking certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.»

Last month, the advocate - general of the European Court of Justice gave his opinion on a long - running legal debate about a patent filed several years ago in Germany.

He's given this opinion in court on several occasions as an expert witness in cases where a lawyer of a defendant caught drink - driving has claimed that their client has undiagnosed auto - brewery syndrome.

Given the support offered by the political establishment, it seems likely that home schooling will continue in California regardless of what the court decides in its reconsidered opinion.

That is a strange choice, given that it is among the Supreme Court's most poorly constructed and internally contradictory opinions.

The opinions of hearing officers who rule in special - education disputes between schools and parents should be given great weight, a federal appeals court has ruled.

As the court explained in its opinion, such a disruption was likely, given what had occurred in previous years:

Consistent with NSBA's position as outlined in its «friend of the court» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rCourt's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt substitute for trial testimony.»

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

While many groups, from indie booksellers up to US Congressmen have voiced their opinions, these two organizations have actually sought permission to use a «friend of the court» brief as a way to have their stance on the entire proceedings — but specifically the settlement reached with three of the publishers — entered into record, also giving Judge Denise Cote a mechanism to take their points into consideration.

Rothko gave similar testimony, saying he stays clear of offering opinions on the authenticity of his father's work so that he doesn't end up in court.

«Docket Alarm adds insights from court filings in cases that never result in an opinion, giving litigators a more complete picture in their research, said Ed Walters, Fastcase CEO.

«Adding law review citations to judicial opinions helps us rank search results more intelligently, for example, giving a relevance boost to cases that aren't cited by courts, but are cited by law review articles.

At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.

Ever wonder why someone who is in the business of selling court opinions would want to support a project that is devoted to giving them away for free?

Although Lord Hope recognised that the issue of balance was not mentioned in either Engel or Guzzardi and that it does not feature in the wording of Art 5, he was nevertheless of the opinion that: ``... there are sufficient indications elsewhere in the court's case law that the question of balance is inherent in the concepts that are enshrined in the Convention and that they have a part to play when consideration is being given to the scope of the first rank of fundamental rights that protect the physical security of the individual» (at [27]-RRB-.

The question is: does the Court still need to give an Opinion now that the European Parliament has rejected ACTA?

I stand in front of a judge and give a professional opinion and write legal reports to court, and do exactly the same work as an attorney - GAL does.

See also the majority opinion at page 11: «Given our explanation in Booker that appellate «reasonableness» review merely asks whether the trial court abused its discretion...»

Then the author describes the basic structure of opinions and gives examples from the court's own decisions.

And although references to the suggested exception appear in opinions in cases decided since the Watson rule has been held to be mandated by the First Amendment, [Footnote 6] no decision of this Court has given concrete content to or applied the «exception.»

Given that the Court expressed its opinion that damages for a breach of the new tort not exceed $ 20,000 in most circumstances, employers will most likely see employees adding an alleged breach of privacy in applicable wrongful dismissal claims where litigation costs are already being expended.

-- authored by Circuit Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit Judge Reinhardt; discussed in our Oct. 10, 2015 post: District court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act case which substantially reduced fee request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that only small firms prosecuted these type of cases, and upon its use of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.

Secondly, the Supreme Court made it clear that the duties owed by auditors will very much be defined by the scope of their retainer — i.e. an auditor's opinion given for a limited purpose can not be used to found liability when used for purposes other than that for which it was intended.

Fourthly, in rejecting the appellant's argument that upholding the trial decision could lead to indeterminate liability, the Supreme Court implicitly capped the damages that can flow from a single audit opinion at one year — given that statutory audits must occur annually.

The first argument developed by the AG is that «[t] he use of the new approach directives may not compromise the Court's jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings» (see para. 42 - 45 of the Opinion).

For the reasons given by the Court of Appeal, we are all of the opinion that the exclusion from the insurance policy based on art. 2402 of the Civil Code of Québec may not be set up against the heirs of the insured, as that article must, even in light of s. 34 (1) of the federal Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I - 21, be interpreted having regard to the principles of interpretation that apply in the area of insurance law so as to favour the precision and certainty of the grounds for exclusion in such matters.

The staff can not tell you whether or not you should sue someone, recommend any specific attorney or law firm, give you an opinion about your case or predict how a judge might rule, talk to a judge on your behalf, or tell you what words to use in your court papers or at a court hearing.

A recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the Dutch immigration authorities were not required to give a person access to a legal opinion about the person's immigration status, though the opinion contained personal information about the person.

Former Senior Judge at the Court of Protection, Denzil Lush, recently gave his opinion regarding Lasting Powers of...

In doing so, this assists the client and their advisers in deciding whether it is worth taking the matter to court and, when acting in a formal Expert capacity, to give independent opinion.

Moreover, apart from certain elements of legitimacy such as consistency, feasibility, and unambiguity, Weatherill argues that the introduction of dissenting opinions would open the reasoning in hard cases up to scrutiny and development and give the Court more legitimacy (p. 108)-- this a suggestion that, so I guess, more than just one academic would support.

In addressing the employee's dishonesty, the Court noted that «there is a significant difference, particularly when considering cause for termination, between an employee being dishonest with an employer and an employee giving an opinion, even an overly optimistic opinion, that turns out to be wrong.»

Any person whom the court proposes to name in a FAO must be given an opportunity to comment on an officer's opinion.

And, as I wrote earlier, the ECJ will be asked by Belgium to give an Opinion on the compatibility of the Investment Court System in CETA with the Treaties.

Please before giving long explanation answer briefly, what by your opinion and from your experience court will decide in the cases UPDATE and UPDATE2?

The issue came before the court on the question of whether it could publicly discuss the district court's reasoning given that the opinions were sealed.

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

Indeed, I agree with the view expressed by MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL in his dissenting opinion: unless there exists some basis for a finding of fault other than that given by the Supreme Court of Florida, there can be no liability.

And yet, even though Cunningham majority opinion had six votes for a seemingly strong view of the Court's Sixth Amendment work, reading all the opinions in Rita gives me the impression that only three Justices (Justices Scalia, Souter and Thomas) are deeply concerned with safeguarding, in Justice Souter's words, «the guarantee of a robust right of jury trial.»