Sentences with phrase «court opinion involving»
Mauro notes that one of the winning court opinions involved the baggy pants style of fashion that we've discussed here, but in a different context.
http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/ Not exact matches
It's too bad that laws and courts must become involved with what used to be the simplest of lessons: Not everyone thinks the same way, but everyone is entitled to their opinions; if that kid won't play with you — or that baker will not make your cake — someone else will, so just kiss them up to God, and move on.
Because public opinion supporting certain kinds of abortion is close to unanimous; it was formed before the 1973 Supreme Court decision; and the majority that have come of sexual age since that year now take for granted that fertility decisions are to be made only by the individuals involved.
I wished that the Chief Justice under this circumstances in my candid opinion could speak to the two members of parliament involved directly with signs of remorse especially when the merit of the case is NOT determined so that they can feel comfortable appearing before her in court otherwise this may NEGATIVELY affect the morale and confidence and trust of the two MPs in the process especially in the CJ going forward and it may lead to a discontinuation of the case since it's only dismissed on technical grounds but not on its merits.
Individual liability insurance may be seen as being over cautious, or unnecessary, so I will end this article with an anecdote that involved the organiser of a group trip that was sued in the small claims court over what was effectively a difference of opinion about a suitable alternative when something went wrong on a trip.
If so, such an opinion would be especially compelling coming from the pen of Justice Thomas, the lone black member of the Court, who has written for the majority in a number of important cases involving religion and education.
In writing the majority opinion, Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer said Commonwealth Court has previously decided in lawsuits involving Montessori Charter School in Erie and Northside Urban Pathways in Pittsburgh that more than one charter school site is permitted.
The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.
The Texas Supreme Court issued a long - awaited opinion in Medlen v. Strickland, refusing to allow noneconomic damages for loss of a pet in a case involving a local municipal shelter.
And even more interesting, Steph Tai at Concurring Opinions ponders how the Carhart Court's willingness to defer to Congressional findings to resolve scientific uncertainty might apply in other cases such as those involving global warming, where scientific and legal findings are intermingled.
Entertaining different views of the questions now before us in this case, and having arrived at a conclusion different from that of a majority of the Court, and considering the importance of the case and the constitutional principle involved in it, I shall proceed, with all due respect for the opinion of others, to assign the reasons upon which my own has been formed.
-- authored by Circuit Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit Judge Reinhardt; discussed in our Oct. 10, 2015 post: District court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act case which substantially reduced fee request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that only small firms prosecuted these type of cases, and upon its use of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.
The Supreme Court issues public opinions in all cases, even those said to involve state secrets.
Earlier this month, a federal court of appeals issued a written opinion in a workplace injury case involving claims made by an employee that the allegedly negligent party intentionally destroyed or lost evidence necessary to his case.
While the opinion given by the Supreme Court of Canada is not considered to be of the same precedential value as the decisions involving regular litigants, governments do not usually ignore the Court's opinion.
There are many costs involved in filing a claim for compensation, including court filing fees, enlisting the assistance of expert witnesses to go on the stand or write an opinion about your injuries, and the costs of deposing witnesses.
Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case discussing when summary judgment is appropriate in a car accident case involving the payment of future medical expenses.
Earlier this month, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a written opinion in a premises liability case involving a woman who broke her leg while crossing a street.
Some flaws are structural; others involve poor management of the judiciary as a whole and of individual courts and judges; a third set concerns «deficiencies in how federal judges decide cases and justify their decisions in judicial opinions,» including a mechanical formalism and an unwillingness to confront openly the task of solving complex problems.
Earlier last month, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia released an opinion regarding an incident of road rage that went too far, resulting in serious injury to one of the drivers involved.
Before the Supreme Court, we note both the specific issue and the area of the law involved, the prevailing party and the vote, the writers and length of all opinions, the number of amicus curiae briefs and who each amicus supported, and of course each Justice's vote.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Texas issued a written opinion in a Texas car accident case involving the question of whether the defendant employer could be held liable for the allegedly negligent actions of an employee.
Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case discussing the theory of premises liability as it pertained to a case involving a child who was seriously injured when a metal stanchion fell atop his finger.
Act 2, including: changes to Wisconsin's product liability laws; adding Daubert standards for cases tried in Wisconsin involving expert opinion and evidence; eliminating the controversial «risk contribution» theory created by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 2005 Thomas v. Mallett decision; placing caps on punitive damages; and reducing frivolous lawsuits by holding parties liable for costs and fees for filing frivolous claims.
South Carolina Appellate Court Rule 268 (d)(2) states, «Memorandum opinions and unpublished orders have no precedential value and should not be cited except in proceedings in which they are directly involved.»
Earlier this month, an appellate court issued an opinion in a personal injury case involving the aggressive acts of a third party, discussing how such acts can play into a landowner's liability to its visitors.
Late last month, an appellate court in Indiana issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving a bicyclist who was injured while riding on a government - owned trail.
Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving several interesting issues that are relevant for Florida accident victims.
His job duties, according to the court's opinion, often involved working with or near butter flavorings containing the chemical diacetyl.
Earlier this month, an appellate court in Georgia issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving allegations that an insurance company acted in bad faith when it failed to settle a case that later resulted in a substantial jury verdict.
Earlier this month, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a written opinion in an Indiana car accident case involving a plaintiff's claim that the employer of a delivery driver was responsible for injuries caused by the delivery driver.
Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit illustrating an issue that may have an impact on some Indiana premises liability cases involving children who have been injured while in the company of their parents.
Leave may be granted under (a) where there is a conflicting decision by another judge or court in Ontario or elsewhere on the matter involved in the proposed appeal and it is, in the opinion of the judge hearing the motion, desirable that leave to appeal be granted.
I just like fact that Gall does not involve crack and, more than that, I think the contrast between the district - court opinion and the CoA's treatment of the case is an excellent «vehicle» for the Court to decide whether to give district judges significant sentencing discrecourt opinion and the CoA's treatment of the case is an excellent «vehicle» for the Court to decide whether to give district judges significant sentencing discreCourt to decide whether to give district judges significant sentencing discretion.
Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a Massachusetts assault case brought against a student who was involved in a...
R v Kennedy [2007] UKHL 38, [2007] All ER (D) 247 (Oct): in this case the question certified by the Court of Appeal Criminal Division for the opinion of the law lords neatly encapsulates the question raised by this appeal: «When is it appropriate to find someone guilty of manslaughter where that person has been involved in the supply of a class A controlled drug, which is then freely and voluntarily self - administered by the person to whom it was supplied, and the administration of the drug then causes his death?»
The Court decided the trial judge had carefully weighed the evidence as a whole, including the statistical evidence, the evidence specific to the Plaintiff, and the three expert opinions, all of which involved some speculation and held that she made no palpable and overriding error in finding that the plaintiff had failed to establish causation on a balance of probabilities:
2 These circumstances raise two sets of issues to which this opinion is addressed: first, the ethical and practical concerns posed in a lawyer - client relationship when a limited scope engagement is entered into; and second, issues related to the obligation of lawyers to reveal the existence of such a limited scope engagement to others involved in the matter, most particularly to courts before whom clients are appearing pro se, with assistance from a lawyer with whom he or she has a limited scope engagement.
The Court states, in the opening line of its opinion, that this case involves only a reexamination of that portion of Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965), concerning
One of the many proposals for FISA court reform involves a version of this requirement: Senate Bill 1467 would require the FISA courts to release any opinions containing a «significant construction or interpretation of law.»
KG v. CAE Machinery Ltd. (1995), 62 C.P.R. (3d) 26 (F.C.T.D.) that «I am also of the opinion that, in general, summary judgment is not the proper means to obtain judgment where the issues before the court involve the infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participacourt involve the infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participaCourt on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participating.
From the title you already get it; it's about the role of expert witnesses in various subject fields, the legal challenges involved and the personal opinions of these expert witnesses on how courts operate in their given subject fields.
A recently released opinion from the Missouri Court of Appeals addresses some interesting points of law involving the Fireman's Rule.
The December 21, 2009, In the Matter of an Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar opinion by the South Carolina Supreme Court involved a lawyer issuing discount coupons through the lenders and real estate agents who referred business to him.
November 04, 2013 - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's opinion last week, saying an insurer had demonstrated prejudice from an uninsured motorist claim in which the policyholder submitted «untimely notice» of a «phantom vehicle» involved in the cCourt affirmed a lower court's opinion last week, saying an insurer had demonstrated prejudice from an uninsured motorist claim in which the policyholder submitted «untimely notice» of a «phantom vehicle» involved in the ccourt's opinion last week, saying an insurer had demonstrated prejudice from an uninsured motorist claim in which the policyholder submitted «untimely notice» of a «phantom vehicle» involved in the crash.
Yes, it's all rather technical but the upshot is that the Boston court will have to decide which opinion to follow: that of a New York appeals court which favors Aereo, or that of lower courts in Los Angeles and DC, which side with broadcasters (though neither of the latter opinions involve Aereo directly).
The client may wish to involve the therapist in the court proceedings because the therapist may be able to render an «opinion» if «qualified» by the client's attorney (verb not adjective) as an «expert.»
The child custody evaluation process involves compiling information and forming opinions regarding the custody of the child and articulating that information to the Court, the parents, and the parent's attorneys.
Any collection of psychological testing, interviews, home visits, evaluative reports and other expert opinion to provide non-bonding recommendations to the court in determining an award in the best interest of the child (ren) involving parents conflicted in a custody dispute.
Looking at the relevant law across the nation, the court found that there was a split in opinion as to whether noneconomic damages could be recovered in a case not involving physical harm.