The case summaries below are taken from the Virginia Supreme
Court opinions website.
The case summary is taken from the Virginia Supreme
Court opinions website.
Not exact matches
The
website that posts
opinions of Massachusetts appellate
courts was shut down this morning because no one renewed the site's domain name.
That system charges the public for access tomany filings and is daunting to use, says Lissner, whose group recently has taken all the free written orders and
opinions available in PACER and made them accessible on the
website Court Listener.
Zvenyach, general counsel to the Council of the District of Columbia and a bit of a coding nerd, has created a Javascript application that regularly scans the
opinions posted to the Supreme
Court website and then sends out an alert via Twitter whenever a change is made.
A newly launched
website, The Free Law Reporter, provides free access to a searchable index of recent federal and state
court opinions.
In a post here recently, I mourned the death of Peter Nordberg, creator of the
website Daubert on the Web and of the related blog, Blog 702, both devoted to the Supreme
Court's seminal
opinion on expert evidence.
CALI's goal in creating FLR, the
website says, is «to create a body of
court opinions that is accessible to anyone including educators, librarians, students, lawyers and the public.»
That's the story out of a free public
website in Massachusetts: The site provides the public with online copies of
opinions from both the Supreme Judicial
Court and the Appeals
Court.
Court Buddy is not liable for any statements, representations, ratings, endorsements, advertisements, testimonials, responses, comments, information,
opinions, advice, links to any third party
websites and content contained on such third party
websites, or content of any other kind transmitted by attorneys, and any such reference (s) on the Site are not a sponsorship, endorsement, or recommendation by
Court Buddy.
Wagner described one case where a
website that contained a policy effectively overruled by the
Court's decision was taken down within minutes of the publication of the
opinion.
«The Supreme
Court has never allowed live electronic media coverage of its proceedings, but the
Court posts
opinions and transcripts of oral arguments on its
website.
Among lawyers nationwide, he was widely known as the creator of the
website Daubert on the Web and later of the related blog, Blog 702, both devoted to the Supreme
Court's seminal
opinion on expert evidence.
If the
Court were to follow the
opinion, it would shut the door to jurisdiction based on mere accessibility of a
website in a Member State, at least for infringements of personality rights.
An attorney of law firm may not include, on a
website or other advertisement, a quotation or excerpt from a
court opinion (oral or written) about the attorney's abilities or legal services.
The LII link to the
opinions of the 7th Circuit appeal
court, which is where Judge Posner hangs his hat, goes directly to that
court's
website, where one discovers that to find any
opinion at all one has to know the name of a party or a case number.
Reasons for judgement were published today on the BC Supreme
Court website dealing with the scope of permissible neuropsychological
opinion evidence in BC Brain Injury Cases.
In this
Court's
opinion, a reasonable person in Plaintiff's place would not foresee that the statements on the
website would be interpreted as a serious expression of an intent to harm or kill anyone listed on the
website.
Please note that the decisions that appear on this
website are not the official versions of the
court's entry orders or
opinions.
Read the
court's disclaimer on their
website regarding these «slip»
opinions.
Available at http://harvardlawreview.org/2014/03/perma-scoping-and-addressing-the-problem-of-link-and-reference-rot-in-legal-citations/ (finding that 49.9 % of
websites cited in US Supreme
Court opinions and 29.9 - 34.2 % cited in three law reviews no longer linked to the originally cited material — at 180, 186)... [Link to full Rotten World blog post.]
If you think the U.S. Supreme
Court posts official versions of their
opinions on their
website... hahaha... I have a virtual bridge and an inside WH or Congressional source to sell you for $ 1B dollars.
Though disdaining Wikipedia, the Lawson
court itself relied on a private internet
website as of 2011, noting it had been «updated June 2010,» for a factual foundation for its legal holding of a rational basis for the federal statute on animal fighting activities.40 Likewise, in the body of its
opinion in State v. D.C., 41 the Fifth District cited various
websites addressing how HIV can be transmitted.
I was checking the US Supreme
Court's
website for recent
opinions and came across one for State of Montana v. State of Wyoming and State of North Dakota.
Slip
opinions are issued Fridays after 9:00 a.m. and are retained on the
court's
website until they are published in the official reporter of Alaska appellate decisions - Pacific Reporter (P. 2d and P. 3d), and the Alaska Reporter, which contains the Alaska cases excerpted from P. 2d and P. 3d.
The Washington State
Court website contains free
opinions from the last 90 days, and then links to www.legalWA.org; the LegalWA site links directly to the Municipal Research Services Center of Washington, a nonprofit dedicated to providing free legal resources for Washington where case law from 1854 forward can be found.
Second Circuit
opinions are available from the
Court's
website (use Sotomayor as a search term).
With a rise in state and local requirements regarding
website accessibility, along with varying
court opinions on the issue, businesses could be subject to inconsistent rules across jurisdictions.