Sentences with phrase «court order he thought»

Not exact matches

The second is the president's habitual misstatements of facts and statistics that I really think have caused the court to look upon his claims about the national - security imperative for this order with great skepticism.»

One might have thought that that would be the end of the matter, but instead Burnaby commenced this action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a declaration (at para 13) «that the National Energy Board does not have the constitutional jurisdiction to issue an order to the City of Burnaby that directs or limits the City of Burnaby in the enforcement of its bylaws.»

And if you think the Branch Dividians had it coming, I suggest you research their history; no less than 3 times before they had been arrested PEACEFULLY for having automatic weapons and 3 times the courts found them legal and ordered them returned to the BD's.

«I think the odds of a court ordering the cross removed are literally zero,» said Jeffrey Toobin, CNN's legal analyst.

2)» «I think the odds of a court ordering the cross removed are literally zero,» said Jeffrey Toobin, CNN's legal an - alyst.

A quiet word from his Superior in Germany, with a reference to the wishes of the Order's Superior General in Rome, and to criticism at the papal court, would, it had been thought, do the trick.

[20] Jonathan Arnott later withdrew midway through the contest on 15 August 2016, saying he thought he could only come second and that he was not prepared to «court controversy in order to gain column inches» to be elected Leader.

He says educators thought for the past 11 years that everyone agreed on the same interpretation of the court order, and that it would one day be fulfilled and applied to the entire state.

He said educators thought for the past 11 years that everyone agreed on the same interpretation of the court order, and that it would one day be fulfilled and applied to the entire state.

This could be extended as part of the wider changes to the EU's institutional structures that the Germans are keen to secure in order to anchor the new eurozone arrangements firmly in a rules based system — think European Court of Justice sanctions for breaking debt and deficit rules.

Ummm, actually, I think the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over executive orders.

McDonald was in the CapTon studio this week for an interview on an unrelated matter (a hearing he had held on PTSD with his fellow vet, Sen. Lee Zeldin), and seemed unconcerned about the possibility that he might face a primary this fall (or, June 26, if the Senate GOP ever comes around to the Assembly Democrats» way of thinking on moving the primary date to conincide with the court - ordered House and US Senate contests).

I presume that this is not what Lord Carlile means - and having seen a lot of the control order documentation used in court, I think he understates the problem.

He said, «The court has already given an order that the seizure should be advertised and anybody, who has an interest or thinks he is the owner, should come in and file an affidavit and explain the basis upon which he is claiming the money.

All these real strong evidences of harm, I think, for us, gave us such concern that we could not wait for this case to be resolved after a number of years, and so we moved for an expedited order, so we requested that the court order that this jail stop placing juveniles in solitary.

The high court ordered a new contested - case hearing for the permit, putting The Hawaii Island New Knowledge (THINK) fund in an awkward position.

US District Judge U.W. Clemon stated in his ruling that, while he was bound to rule only upon a court order, dating from 2001, he thought that the Alabama law was «probably unconstitutional.»

When the court - ordered desegregation plan in Prince George's County was ended in 2002, the superintendent formed a panel of experts on magnet schools that was thought to be politically and ideologically diverse.

, Tony Shafrazi Gallery, New York, US Intervention / Decoration, Foreground Projects, Frome, Somerset, UK Ambition d'Art, Institute d'Art Contemporain, Villeurbanne - Lyon, FR Redone, Kröller - Müller Museum, Otterlo, NL A Bookcase for Onestar Press by Lawrence Weiner, Christophe Daviet - Thery, Paris, FR Mes Amis, Dvir Gallery, Tel Aviv, IL Reconstruction # 3: Artists» Playground, Sudeley Castle, Winchcombe, Gloucestershire, UK Advancing the Experience: Robert Ryman & Urs Raussmüller, Hallen für Neue Kunst, Schaffhausen, CH Art Basel, Kino Mascotte, Basel, CH Cul - de-sac, curated by Lino Polrgato, Small Dead End Courts Around Venice, IT 2008: FREEDOM - American Sculpture, curated by Marie Jeanne de Rooij, Stichting Den Haag Sculptuur, Den Haag, NL Revolutions - Forms That Turn, Biennale of Sydney, Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney, AU Slow Glass, Lisa Cooley, New York, US Thoughts On Democracy: Reinterpreting Norman Rockwell's «Four Freedoms» Poster, The Wolfsonian, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, US artCRUSH, Aspen Art Museum, Colorado, US NOLEFTOVERS, Kunsthalle Bern, CH Translocomotion 7th Shanghai Biennale, curated by Julian Heynan, Henk Slager, Shanghai, CN German Angst, Neuer Berliner Kunstverein, Berlin, DE TEXT drawings, Leo Castelli Gallery, New York, UK Drawings on Graph Paper, Leslie Tonkonow Artworks + Projects, New York, US Pleinairism, curated by Kitty Scott, i8 Gallery, Reykjavik, IS Une Grosse Caisse dans un Orchestre Symphonique, Center d'art Contemporain, Saint Restitut, FR Variation 1, Wiener Konzerthaus, Vienna, AT Wall Rockets: Contemporary Art Artists and Ed Ruscha, curated by Lisa Dennison, The FLAG Art Foundation, New York, US; Albright - Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, New York, US XX, CAG, Vancouver, CA Wall Works, Buchmann Galerie, Lugano, CH ABC No Rio 2008 Gala & Benefit Auction, Angel Orensanz Foundation for the Arts, New York, US The Panza Collection, The Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, US 2 x -LSB-(2 x 20) + (2 x 2)-RSB- + 2 = XX (DESPERATELY) TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE WORLD, curated by Konrad Bitterli, Part I, Mai 36 Galerie, Zurich, CH, Part II, Brook Alexander Gallery, New York, US Collected Visions Modern and Contemporary Works from the JP Morgan Chase Art Collection, Pera Museum, Istanbul, TR This is the Gallery and the Gallery is Many Things, Eastside Projects, Birmingham, UK Love Love Love, Martos Gallery, New York, US Whatever Happened to Sex in Scandinavia, curated by Marta Kuzma, Office for Contemporary Art Norway, Oslo, NO Passage To The North, screening SI Annual Benefit, Swiss Institute, New York, US Posesion, curated by Montserrat and Pablo Sigg, Petra, Mexico City, MX Now You See It, Aspen Art Museum, Colorado, US Order.

So I think we all need to rule misrepresentations out of order because the court of public opinion already has an overloaded docket in dealing with this kind of futuristic uncertainty.

And I don't think government should have right to wire tap the public unless they a need that serves the public's interest - need to get court order.

by Chris White Daily Caller A New York court ordered AG Eric Schneiderman Thursday to fork over public information about elements of his climate crusade to a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C. New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in a case involving a series of documents conservatives believe could reveal a -LSBcourt ordered AG Eric Schneiderman Thursday to fork over public information about elements of his climate crusade to a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C. New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in a case involving a series of documents conservatives believe could reveal a -LSBCourt ruled in favor of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in a case involving a series of documents conservatives believe could reveal a -LSB-...]

This is something I thought would probably never happen — a science denier, in this case German virologist Stefan Lanka, was ordered by a court to pay 100,000 Euros to German doctor David Barden for meeting his challenge to prove that the measles virus exists.

I am looking forward to hearing what what overhauls to practice and the courts Susskind thinks are necessary in order to liberate legal information.

3) Question: I just met this great girl and I thought we hit it off, but she says she can't go out with me to a bar — any bar in the entire country — until 2012 because of a court order.

We say this because the division of powers part of the judgement (commencing at para 98) is full of all sorts of references to two levels of government (see e.g. para 141) and similar comments about «interlocking federal and provincial schemes» that make it abundantly clear that this Court has given no thought to the space within which indigenous laws may operate within the modern constitutional order (for recognition that the law making authority of aboriginal peoples pre-dated the Crown's acquisition of sovereignty, was not extinguished by that acquisition of sovereignty and was not impaired by the division of legislative powers between the federal and provincial governments in 1982 see Campbell v British Columbia (2000), 189 DLR (4th) 333 (BCSC) and Justice Deschamps in Beckman v Little Salmon / Carmacks First Nation, [2010] 3 SCR 103 at para 97).

Child Custody and Parenting Orders Emergency Protection Orders Exclusive Possession Orders Financial Support Options Gathering Evidence of Abuse If You're Thinking of Leaving Leaving an Abusive Relationship... If you are not a Canadian citizen No Contact Orders — Flowchart Peace Bonds Planning for an Emergency Preparing for Court Queen's Bench Protection Orders Restraining Orders Serving Documents on an Abusive Party Working with a Family Law Lawyer Writing an Affidavit

It requires a group of lawyers to sit in a room with a team from IT, and to think through every step that a lawyer can take in the litigation process; everything that they do to prepare a case to make sure that the case is compliant with court orders; to make sure that the customer service is exceptional, that clients are updated and that the case is moving on schedule.

So the court might determine that the cases are moot because the orders have expired and done their work, or in fact, they might wind up deciding them, but I think there's a good preview of the fact that they're going to uphold the President in those circumstances, and of course, Justice Thomas and again Justice Gorsuch objected to the fact that the court carved out an exception for people with a context, and essentially it would appear as though they told both the Ninth and Fourth Circuits that it's incredible that these are in fact, the powers of the President.

@BlueDogRanch: If an animal destroys my car I don't think the courts would order the animal to pay for it.

The Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, s 299 and sch 11 were brought into force on 20 May 2009 (except for schedule 11 paras 3 (3), 8 (3) and 14 (3) relating to court power to discharge or amend which are not to be commenced because they are no longer thought to be necessary in view of the decision in Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association heard with Knowsley above) by the Act's fifth commencement order (SI 2009/1261).

The Luxembourg Court, in adherence to the great shift in thoughts aimed at protecting «the rule of law at the national and international levels», as the United Nations General Assembly urges (see UN GA Resolution A / RES / 67 / 2012), and intended to repress the crime of serious VAT fraud, with established an effective measure (i.e., the disapplication of national rules incompatible with Article 325 (1) TFEU, Article 2 (1) of the 1995 PIF Convention as well as Directive 2006/112 on the EU's common system of VAT, read in conjunction with Article 4 (3) TEU) which, alongside the guilty, condemns States defaulting and disrespecting EU law and the founding principles of the world legal order.

Freedom of contract was primarily the order of the day, except where the court thought the agreed contract went against broad concepts of morality and public policy.

A Supreme Court justice thought otherwise and ordered the notice period and hence financial compensation be set at 18 months.

However, in the 21st century, digitized access is also critical in order to promote Canadian innovation in the space and to foster new thinking about an accessible and transparent court system and the all - too - murky litigation process in ways that would simply not otherwise be possible.

A Singapore court that grants a judgment of divorce, judicial separation or nullity of marriage, has the power to order division between the parties of any matrimonial asset or the sale of any such asset and the division between the parties of the proceeds of the sale of any such asset «in such proportions as the court thinks just and equitable.»

2012), holds what I thought was obvious: one can not collaterally attack a family court order in circuit court.

What this line of thought illustrates is that SRLs are a challenge not just to legal process and order in court (if you'll pardon the pun) but to the economic order of things in law, and that the economic ramifications of self - representative capacity reach far beyond the business of law itself.

It was decided the appeal should be re-argued before five judges in order that, if it thought it right to do so, the court could reverse or vary its earlier decisions.

The Ohio case raises the question of what the lawyer who wears a pin to court (thinking it is permitted) should do when faced with a court order to remove it.

«I think [the information] will help lawyers and judges in particular who are making court orders.

«We think there are serious grounds for appeal and that the Court of Appeal will take issue with some of Justice Perell's reasoning and what's in the order,» he says.

However, the Court of Appeal confirmed the broad remedial jurisdiction afforded to the Tribunal under the Ontario Human Rights Code to order a party to do anything the Tribunal thinks it should in order to promote compliance with the Act.

and the court may, without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, make any order it thinks just.

I think this case presents only a single federal question: did the order of the Maryland Court of Appeals granting a new trial, limited to the issue of punishment, violate petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection?

You'd be forgiven for thinking that this was the case, because before making an application to court for a child arrangements or financial order you have to find a mediator and show that you have thought about mediation.

One would think that giving Wife full credit for $ 52,279.66 in return for Husband's $ 3,982.80 punished Husband enough for his failure to follow the temporary order but apparently, to our Supreme Court, it wasn't.

Moreover, are there any regulations you think each state could adopt from others, in order to enhance their courts and litigation process?

(10) A party to the proceeding may appeal an order mentioned in subsection (4) or (9) to the Divisional Court, which may confirm the order or may order the Director to change the order or to make whatever other order the court thinksCourt, which may confirm the order or may order the Director to change the order or to make whatever other order the court thinkscourt thinks fit.

«The court must make an order for possession unless it thinks that the procedure under ss143E and 143F has not been followed.»