Sentences with phrase «court rejected the application»

If the court rejects your application, it may be possible to file a consumer proposal as a means of discharging your student loans.

Symbion Power LLC v Venco Imtiaz Construction Company [2017] EWHC 348 (TCC)-- We acted successfully for the defendant, Venco, in this High Court case where the Court rejected an application to set aside an ICC arbitration award for serious irregularity under section 68 (2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996 on the basis that the tribunal had failed to deal with issues which were put to it.

Stephenson Harwood has ceased acting for former Leeds United managing director David Haigh in Dubai after a local court rejected an application for some of Haigh's funds to be released to pay his legal fees.

German labor court rejects application by Lufthansa for temporary injunction against strike by pilots, Reuters

In the course of the proceedings the Court rejected applications to amend claims against PDV Marina so as to introduce claims in restitution and misrepresentation and considered the ingredients of the relevant causes of action (see [2015] EWHC 1986 (Comm)-RRB-.

Not exact matches

China's top court has ruled in favor of French fashion house Christian Dior in a perfume bottle trademark case, and rapped the local trademark office for rejecting an application by the firm.

TOKYO — The Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange in Tokyo is headed for liquidation after a court rejected its bankruptcy protection application.

Please be advised that in accordance with the Order Amending the Claims Procedure Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice of Revision or Disallowance by no later than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise ordered by the Court on application by the Monitor.

His parents said that the youngster had defied doctors» expectations and they took their case to the Court of Appeal, but the application to take him abroad was rejected.

Her application to have her conversion legally recognized by Malaysian courts was rejected in 2007 when the high court said it did not have jurisdiction over religious matters.

(EFCC Press Release) Justice M.B. Idris of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Monday, May 8, 2017, rejected an application filed...

He is dangerously ill but this week an application to the high court for his release from custody was rejected.

An Ikeja High Court on Monday rejected an application to vary the bail conditions brought by Marco Ramirez, an American, accused of defrauding three Nigerians of $ 565,000 (N204.2 m) in a green card scam.

Justice Muslim Hassan of a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday rejected an ex parte application by Justice Rita Ofili - Ajumogobia, seeking immediate release from the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

At today's sitting, prosecution counsel, Idris Abdullahi Mohammed, urged the court to reject the application filed by the defence counsel.

(EFCC Press Release) Justice M.B. Idris of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Monday, May 8, 2017, rejected an application filed by a former First Lady, Patience Jonathan, seeking a declaration that she owns the sum of $ 9.8 m domiciled in Skye Bank.

Deputy Ranking Member of Parliament's Committee on Employment, Richard Quashigah, is urging persons whose applications to join the Ghana Immigration Service were rejected, to drag the Service to court over their Ghc50 initial payment.

The Federal High Court in Lagos on Friday rejected an application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission seeking to seize the funds in 15 bank accounts linked to Mrs. Patience Jonathan.

An Accra High Court has rejected an application filed by Executive Secretary of COPEC Duncan Amoah asking it to dismiss...

A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected an ex parte application filed by the Senator representing Delta Central, Ovie Omo - Agege, to stop his suspension by...

In his ruling, Justice Abubakar Talba rejected the EFCC's application for an adjournment on the ground that the prosecution did not place sufficient materials before the court to enable it exercise its discretion in its favour.

* * * We find no error in the court's application of the Unelko test and reject the cross-appeal.

This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada rejected his application for leave to appeal the most recent court decision allowing his extradition to GerCourt of Canada rejected his application for leave to appeal the most recent court decision allowing his extradition to Gercourt decision allowing his extradition to Germany.

W's application was before the court, but it was «rejected» because she had not «shown cause why the agreement should not be made an order of the court».

There was a similar case in Germany, when the Federal Patent Court (FPC) rejected an application for a shape trademark application for sweets, based on its «mere technical function».

In both Elite Taxi and Uber France and in accordance with the Advocate General's Opinion in that first case (discussed previously on this blog), the Court of Justice rejected this line of defence, confirming that Uber itself, through its UberPOP application, offers more than simple intermediation.

Summary: The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court a decision of the Svea Court of Appeal, which had rejected the appellant's application to declare an arbitral award invalid on the basis that...

On February 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge M. David Weisman of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in Chicago, rejected an application by the government for a provision in a search warrant compelling people present...

The Court rejected the appellants» argument that the application of Trillium required «a broader, more contextual analysis when assessing the place of the contract for purposes of a jurisdictional determination.»

Secondly, the Court rejected the argument that the application judge erred in not directing the outstanding financial dispute to proceed to trial of the issues.

The Court rejected that the motion judge erred in applying the traditional evidentiary burden and found that her application of this principle was not unreasonable and within her discretionary powers.

The appellant argued that the Secretary of State's refusal of her application was incompatible with the Directive in question, though the First - tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal all rejected this argument.

The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench recently rejected an application to judicially review the dismissal of a meritorious human rights claim.

The Ontario Court of Appeal's recent decision in G & P Procleaners and General Contractors Inc. v. Gore Mutual Insurance Co. («Procleaners»)[1] is an interesting example of the application of the «your work» exclusion, particularly since the Court rejected the approach to policy interpretation that the Newfoundland Court of Appeal gave to an exclusion with very similar wording.

Having rejected a wide interpretation of the term «provided» and also having refused the application of additional criteria to Article 12 (1) by analogy, the CJEU also replied negatively to the question of the German court whether any further criteria had to be taken into consideration in addition to those contained in Article 12 (1) and 2 (b) with systematic coherence and judicial constraint.

But now Superior Court Justice Duncan Grace has rejected that application.

The High Court (Coulson J) yesterday rejected an application by Bristol City Council under reg.

Lawyer Holli Kuski Bassett, who represented Merchant Law Group in its leave application, says the positions being advanced by the government were previously rejected by Saskatchewan courts in 2006, 2007 and 2008.

No evidence was provided to the court and the submission was rejected the judge stating that it «must have been obvious to the defendant long before» the date of application.

In rejecting the application of the commercial exception in the circumstances, the court held that the ultimate intention or purpose of the state acts of torture did not make them «commercial» in nature; rather, the acts themselves must be commercial.

In consequence of this, the next enforcement application made by IPCO was rejected under section 103 (3) of the 1996 Act (which permits the court to refuse recognition or enforcement of an award if to do so would be contrary to public policy), on the basis that it would be contrary to public policy to allow IPCO to benefit from a potential fraud.

The court's straightforward application of the statutory bar to appellate review of remand orders based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction rejects the notion that the AIA somehow creates an exception to that longstanding bar to appellate review.

An application for permission to appeal was rejected by the trial Judge and the Court of Appeal.

The High Court and Court of Appeal both rejected UNISON's application.

The court will not reject the application; it will simply make standard directions on issuing for the filing of those missing documents.

By: Sarah Burton PDF Version: What Happens when a Self - Rep Steps on a Procedural Landmine during Judicial Review Case Commented On: Raczynska v Alberta Human Rights Commission, 2015 ABQB 494 The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench recently rejected an application... Continue reading →

The Court of Appeal rejected the appellant's argument and held that the application judge could properly find that the arbitral award met... Read More

In a decision recently published on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Supreme Court affirmed a decision of the Svea Court of Appeal, which had rejected an appellant's application to declare an arbitral award invalid on the basis that it violated public policy.

In Voisey v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ABQB 316, Justice Crighton of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench rejected an application for habeas corpus and awarded $ 1000 in costs to the respondent.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board correctly rejected a patent application relating to a dog mobility harness device because the applicant did not solely invent the claimed subject matter on which he asserted sole inventorship, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circui