When the city Landmarks Commission in 2006 recommended designation for the Arlington - Deming District in Lincoln Park and the East Village District near Wicker Park, the plaintiffs in the suit, Albert Hanna and Carol Mrowka, both owned property in those areas, the Appellate
Court ruling states.
A 2010 Supreme
Court ruling stated that «to compel a homosexual person to pretend that his sexuality does not exist or suppress the behaviour by which to manifest itself is to deny his fundamental right to be who he is.»
The court ruled the state could review permits that align with the state's Coastal Management Program, first adopted in 1982.
Although as a result of the 2006
court ruling the state promised in 2007 to increase education spending by $ 7 billion over a five - year period, the CFE report concluded that the state is running $ 5 billion short of what it pledged due to a recession that left it hard pressed for revenue.
In the famous Serrano case (1977),
the court ruled the state's spending formula unconstitutional on disparate - impact grounds.
He was viewed as being a supportive player in summer 2011 when Barge worked to help keep 17 charter schools open for 16,000 students after the Georgia Supreme
Court ruled a state charter schools commission that was established in 2008 was unconstitutional.
In a 4 - 3 decision, the Connecticut Supreme
Court ruled the state had an affirmative obligation to provide Connecticut's school children with a substantially equal educational opportunity and that this constitutionally guaranteed right encompasses the access to a public education, which is not substantially and materially impaired by racial and ethnic isolation.
Yet
another court ruling states «moral disapproval alone is an improper basis to deny rights to men and women.»
Catherine Farrelly was quoted by Law360 in reaction to the U.S. Supreme
Court ruling stating that federal court decisions on «likelihood of confusion» can be precluded by earlier findings on the same issue from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Not exact matches
The
state's environment minister has picked three legal professionals to conduct a review into the Environmental Protection Authority, in the wake of the Supreme
Court's
ruling on the Roe 8 highway project last month.
The U.S. Supreme
Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a
court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
court majority
ruled in June that
state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.
The class action, filed in United
States District
Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
The
state of Florida passed a separate, and more strident, physician gag
rule (known as the «Docs vs. Glocks» law) in 2011 — but a federal appeals
court overturned that this past February.
The class action, filed in United
States District
Court, for the District of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
State court rulings are all over the map on this issue and policy makers are still trying to find the right balance between company and personal rights.
The Michigan
courts appeared unlikely to
rule immediately, with one asking for a response from
state elections officials by Tuesday.
Nevada and a few others
states are the only ones permitted to take sports bets, but a major Supreme
Court ruling could upend that dynamic.
A Circuit
Court of Appeals in San Francisco has
ruled that a challenge to the
state's 145 - year - old ban on prostitution may proceed, saying a 2003 Supreme
Court ruling opened the door for closer scrutiny of the law.
But, as of today, the only
court ruling on the matter concluded that Puerto Rico should be treated like a
state for 11th Amendment purposes.
For example, in Hans v. Louisiana (1890), the high
court ruled against a Louisiana resident bondholder on 11th Amendment grounds even though it did not specifically preclude suits by a
state's citizens.
In June 2016, the Supreme
Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the sta
Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals
court ruling in favor of the sta
court ruling in favor of the
states..
As the Supreme
Court gets ready in June to
rule on the issue for the second time in two years, conservative
states have rushed to enact so - called Religious Freedom Reformation Act (RFRA) laws that would allow businesses to object on religious grounds to serving LGBT people and same - sex couples.
In October, California's
state appeals
court ruled that a housekeeper could bring a claim against her employer under the
state's Fair Employment and Housing Act.
The number of such
states would be even higher, according to the Constitutional Accountability Center, if not for important
rulings by three federal appeals
courts.
Florida's
state Supreme
Court ruled that a defendant in a capital case doesn't have the right to have a jury determine that.
In papers being filed with the
state Supreme
Court in Manhattan, the restaurant group likened the
rule to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's failed effort to curb sales of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (473 milliliters).
A 1992 Supreme
Court ruling decreed that online vendors can sell goods without collecting sales tax, as long as they don't have a physical location in a given
state.
«When one
court in a Democratic - leaning
state inevitably
rules against Trump, everyone in Canada will go, «See!
That
court reversed the
ruling, essentially arguing that J. McIntyre established a distribution chain for its products in Ohio, and put its products into the «stream - of - commerce» of the United
States.
Should the decision end in a draw, the ACA could mean different things in different
states, depending on federal
court of appeals
rulings, legal experts say.
«Shareholders can vote, but boards can just ignore them under the «business judgment
rule» backed by
state laws and
courts.
In the United
States last week, a federal
court effectively killed what few
rules there were that prevented Internet providers from discriminating between different types of traffic.
Attending Rhodes»
ruling were Detroit's
state - appointed emergency manager, Kevyn Orr, who took Michigan's biggest city to bankruptcy
court, and Mayor Mike Duggan, who is now tasked with carrying out the plan.
Judge Andreas Korbmacher said on Thursday the country's highest federal administrative
court would
rule on Feb. 27 on an appeal brought by German
states against bans imposed by local
courts in Stuttgart and Duesseldorf over poor air quality.
Same sex marriage is now legal in 36
states, and the Supreme
Court will issue a final
ruling on whether such couples have a federal right to marry in June.
According to media reports, IMG will need to find a new home for the event come September, after the Supreme
Court of the
State of New York Count
ruled Lincoln Center can not renew its contract.
NEW YORK (Reuters)- In a landmark
ruling for non-traditional families in New York, the
state's highest
court on Tuesday held a person need not have a biological or adoptive relationship with a child to be considered a parent.
The attorneys general of New York and Illinois have also declared the games illegal, but those
rulings are being challenged in
state courts.
In May, Alabama
state court ruled against HealthSouth (HLS) in its suit against Ernst and Young, the company's auditor at the time of its major fraud.
In 1997, the Supreme
Court ruled that RFRA only applied to the federal government, not the
states.
Similar legislation, which has arisen in response to federal
court rulings allowing same - sex marriage in the 36
states, is pending in about 16 other
states.
«Their efforts to undermine the agreements were dishonourable and deserving of censure,» the Appeal
Court said in its
ruling, noting, however, that the
state of Canadian law around grey marketing remains unsettled.
In a recent
court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marij
court case, the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marij
Court of Appeals
ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within
state laws regarding medical marijuana.
The
ruling marks the second time the high
court has rendered an opinion in the case, in which the
state is seeking to hold Greenberg accountable for sham transactions at the insurer.
A group of 17
states plan to file a lawsuit in federal appeals
court challenging the Trump administration's decision to declare vehicle emissions
rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
Florida officials made a similar
ruling in May, while
courts in five other
states classified drivers as contract employees.
The 17
states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's decision in April to declare U.S. vehicle emissions and fuel efficiency
rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
Heather Dietrick, president and general counsel of Gawker Media, said in a statement that soon after Mr. Bollea sued the company in 2012, three
state appeals
court judges and a federal judge «repeatedly
ruled that Gawker's post was newsworthy» under the First Amendment.
The
ruling, filed on Tuesday in
state court in San Francisco, was the latest in a host of legal and regulatory challenges facing Uber and other highly valued startups in the United
States and other countries.
«A
ruling by a Louisiana appeals
court recently
stated that the entire death benefit from a single premium annuity plan paid to the beneficiary named in that plan was subject to inheritance tax because it was part of the deceased annuity owner's estate,» says annuities specialist Steven Hart.