Sentences with phrase «court ruled in the case»

The U.S. judge has excluded foreign investors, based on a precedent set in a 2010 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Morrison v. National Australian Bank.

I doubt if many outside of Christianity would disagree with the court ruling in the case.

With the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Allegheny County v. ACLU, I believe a new and exciting chapter in the church - state debate may be evolving around Jewish attempts in Pittsburgh and other places to legitimate the display of Jewish religious symbols in the public square.

Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's appeal has gained some ground in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo in public corruption cases.

Such legal distinctions are illustrated in the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell.

And, he blames the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Citizens United, allowing unlimited independent expenditures, as the reason.

Both times, the court cited a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Republican former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of a corrupt act by a public official.

As the nation awaits Supreme Court ruling in the case between Senator Ali Modu Sheriff and Senator Ahmed Makarfi over the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chairmanship...

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

By Sean Ryan Developers stand to lose no matter which way the state Supreme Court rules in a case prompted by a condominium project in the town of Pacific.

In a groundbreaking victory for Great Lakes wolves, they were again granted Endangered Species Act protection in late 2014, after a federal court ruled in a case brought by one of our partners showing that prematurely stripping wolves of protection violated the Endangered Species Act.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review an appellate court ruling in a case (Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association) challenging the constitutionality of a California law that levies an agency fee on teachers who refuse to join a union.

The state got serious about providing extra funding to low - wealth districts and disadvantaged students back in 1997, when the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in the case Leandro v. State that all students have the right to «an opportunity for a sound, basic education.»

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has recently started bracing itself for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association.

Last year the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Massachusetts v. EPA that the agency has to consider greenhouse gases as air pollutants that may need to be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

The Court ruled in the case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc. that B.C. courts have the power to make Google remove certain websites from its search -LSB-...]

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of Missouri v. Jenkins that a law firm may charge for paralegal services at market rates, not just the actual cost to the firm.

Here, the AG refers to the Court ruling in the case of N.S. and others, and the Handbook for the processing of visa applications and the modification of issued visas, published by the Commission in 2010.

«Hosts not liable for partygoer driving drunk; Top court rules in case brought by woman who was left paraplegic after accident»: This article appears today in The Toronto Globe and Mail.

Marking the one - year anniversary of SC Supreme Court ruling in the case Smith v. Tiffany.

On March 13, The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the case of The Estate of Michelle Evette McCalll vs. the United States of America, overturning an existing cap of $ 500,000 for doctors and $ 1 million for hospitals and clinics on non-economic damages in wrongful death cases.

«Detainees» Lawyers Oppose More Filings»: The Associated Press provides a report that begins, «Attorneys representing hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees urged a federal appeals court Monday to reject a Bush administration request for more legal filings in light of last week's Supreme Court ruling in the case of Osama bin Laden's driver.»

An Iowa appellate court ruled in the case Stewart v. All States Quality Foods, L.P. that a broker is entitled to his commission in a failed short sale of a warehouse because the lender acted in bad faith by waiting until closing to demand a larger share of the proceeds.

Not exact matches

In fact, Lash says this rule might be warranted given a recent court case.

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.

In the case, National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services, the High Court ruled that ISPs are information services, as the FCC had defined them at the time, and not public utilities.

In her announcement, Gillibrand criticized the 2010 Supreme Court case, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, which ruled that the government should not regulate the amount of money corporations and unions can spend on campaigns.

A judge ruled in favor of the House in 2016, but an appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the case moved its way through the courts.

The decision by NB Liquor comes just days after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of Gerard Comeau who was fined in 2012 for bringing home cheaper beer and liquor he bought in neighbouring Quebec.

Separately on Tuesday, a judge for the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, ruled narrowly in favor of the subsidies in a case called David King.

That may all change by this coming summer, when the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on two cases that have the potential to rebalance the scales in favor of small businesses.

In County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, the court rejected a rule that would have held officers accountable for such conduct and sent the case back to the lower court for further consideration.

In fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trollIn fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trollin 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trolls.

In June 2016, the Supreme Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the statesIn June 2016, the Supreme Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the staCourt split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the statesin the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the statesin place an appeals court ruling in favor of the stacourt ruling in favor of the statesin favor of the states..

Both Hebert and Park said they would be surprised if the court were to rule differently in the two cases since they are so similar.

While the Supreme Court in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruCourt in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting rucourt in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruling.

Since the Miller v. Alabama ruling, hundreds of similar cases are being challenged again in the courts.

In December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the KaskIn December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the Kaskin this case to an area known as the Kaska.

Now, with Montgomery v. Louisiana, the court must decide whether that rule can be applied retroactively: Henry Montgomery, the plaintiff in that case, shot and killed a Louisiana sheriff when he was 17 years old — way back in 1963.

Florida's state Supreme Court ruled that a defendant in a capital case doesn't have the right to have a jury determine that.

The president said he would take the case «as far as it needs to go,» including to the Supreme Court, in order to get a ruling that the ban is legal.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Young's case and ultimately rule on what accommodations employers must make under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, a decision that could touchthe lives of the 68 million working women in the U.S. and the 62 % of new moms in the last year who were part of the workforce.

«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.

This week, it faces the U.S. Supreme Court in an effort to maintain a 1992 ruling that allows e-commerce companies to avoid collecting local sales taxes in some cases.

Last week a London court ruled that a plumber was entitled to full employment rights despite being technically self - employed, in a case seen as a key test which could force employers to start offering irregular workers benefits including pensions and holiday pay.

US Supreme Court justices appeared unsure on Tuesday whether to rule against online TV startup Aereo in a major copyright case.

China's top court has ruled in favor of French fashion house Christian Dior in a perfume bottle trademark case, and rapped the local trademark office for rejecting an application by the firm.

Indeed, Scalia himself noted that the high court came within a vote of declaring videocassette recorders «contraband» when it ruled for Sony Corp. in a case over recordings of television programs 30 years ago.

The Liberals are unlikely to make any final decision on drug testing until the Supreme Court of Canada rules on its legality in a case between Suncor and workers at its Alberta oil sands operation, said Troy Winters, senior health and safety officer with the Canadian Union of Public Employees.