Here,
the Court sees a danger for this order.
Not exact matches
The lawsuit in Missouri
courts may have had some reasonable chance of success because citizens of the «Show Me» state have
seen the
dangers of metallic smelting.
When guilty people go free because their constitutional rights have been violated, there's a
danger the public will begin to
see the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as little more than «a game of snakes and ladders,» a judge of the Ontario
Court of Appeal says.
«In our view it is not necessary to provide any paraphrase of the statutory concept of risk, even though judges have in the past felt it necessary to do so:
see, for example, R v Board of Trustees at the Science Museum [1993] 1 WLR 1171, 1171D, -LSB-[1993] 3 All ER 853], in which the
court referred to the concept of risk as containing the idea of «a possibility of
danger».
In other words, even when there is no articulated (false) allegation as to why a child should not
see that other parent, the bias to protect that child from
danger very often jumps into the thinking of the
court, which causes the
court to rarely act quickly and decisively to confront a violation of its own order.
My daughter, throughout the terribly stressful and scary time, had not
seen me in a while with the mother just continually denying my access without reason, and in Contempt of a Family
Court Order, so considering the circumstances, was in serious
danger of being punished by her mother if caught talking to her dad.