Criminal legal aid practitioners are furious, as most are feeling the impact of the reducing numbers of cases going through the system and can see no justification for the cuts.
Not exact matches
The NAO argues that the commission has paid
practitioners # 25m too much and concluded that the LSC should «do more to understand the market for
criminal legal aid to make the most of its ability to control price and quality».
In the event that the Lord Chancellor's proposals proceed, the Law Society will press the MoJ to work with the Society to develop a support package, and commission and publish, before any further cuts in
legal aid rates, an impact assessment of the initial cuts and other changes on the working of the
criminal justice system and defence solicitor
practitioners.»
Meanwhile, ongoing meetings will take place between the CLSA, London
Criminal Court Solicitors Association,
Criminal Bar Association and
Legal Aid Practitioners Group to decide what happens next.
It is paramount that the open and constructive dialogue with
practitioners that led to this decision continues as the MoJ moves forward in determining the way forward for
criminal legal aid.
The government had decided, following its defeat in the previous judicial review brought by the
practitioner groups and the subsequent re-consultation, to increase the number of duty contracts for
criminal legal aid work from 525 to 527.
It thought that «in light of the economic fragility of the
criminal legal aid supplier base, the planned reductions in income for
criminal defence
practitioners may prove to be unsustainable».