Sentences with phrase «cronbach alpha coefficients»

The questionnaire reliability expressed as Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from.68 (for Self - Rating Scale) to.80 (for Dyadic Relationships scale).

In Egypt, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the same communal strength measures were.71 for marriage,.88 for mothers, and.91 for best friends.

In the United States, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the five items measuring communal strength were.85 for spouses,.92 for mothers, and.90 for best friends.

In Egypt, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the same measure of communal strength were.82 for marriage,.54 for mothers, and.89 for best friends.

The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.799.

The applicable Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.903.

A Cronbach alpha coefficient above 0.70 indicates good reliability [12][13].

In this study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient for the RSES was 0.84.

In this study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.91.

Given the relatively low Cronbach alpha coefficient for mothers, we examined the overall pattern of correlations between the five questions asking about mothers.

During the second wave (QMI - 2) of data collection the internal consistency of the QMI scale as measured by the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.91.

During the first wave (QMI - 1) of data collection the internal consistency of the QMI scale as measured by the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.92.

Not exact matches

The reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) of the three family functioning FES subscale measures were slightly lower than reported by Moos (α =.62 for Family Cohesion, α =.59 for Family Expressiveness, and α =.63 for Family Conflict)(Saucier, Wilson, & Warka, 2007).

While Cronbach's alpha coefficients are reported between 0.55 - 0.95 for subscales, only the one subscale was below.70 with many showing very good to excellent reliability.

Cronbach's alpha coefficients are reported between 0.70 - 0.90 for most of the subscales (also see pdf under availability of the scale below).

The internal consistency of Italian PANAS, using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, was satisfactory for positive affect scale (α = 0.74) and negative affect scale (α = 0.79).

Results yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.44 for VLT - I, 0.46 for VLT - D, 0.50 for VMT, 0.71 for VFT, and 0.50 for WMT.

Cronbach's alphas coefficients for depression, anxiety and stress in this study were 0.902, 0.850 and 0.891, respectively.

The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) are satisfactory while the coefficients intraclass are less than those obtained by the authors in the test - retest.

Internal consistency of the UCLA was determined by calculating Cronbach (α) alpha coefficient (with α = 0.7 indicating sufficient reliability).

For the total score of Greek UCLA the results showed a high satisfactory and adequate psychometrically Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.91, which is comparable to alphas reported in previous studies ranging from 0.89 to 0.97.

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was good in the present study (0.97; Duan et al., 2015).

The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total questionnaire and the relationship, vitality, and conscientiousness subscales were good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96, 0.93, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively).

Steger et al. (2006) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranging between.81 and.86 for Presence and between.84 and.92 for Search subscale.

We use SPSS18.0 to analyze the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and the result shows that all variables» Cronbach's alpha coefficient is above 0.7, which suggests the internal consistency of the variables is good, and the scales have a high reliability.

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted; Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were calculated for each subscale; and... intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated for each item.

In the construction study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged between.81 and.86 for Presence and.84 and.92 for Search.

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient in this study was 0.76.

According to Goodman [34], the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire has good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.73.

The Emotional Literacy Checklist has good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient reported of 0.94 [32].

Results showed high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient α = 0.90, test retest reliability ranged from r =.73 to r =.96 (ps <.01), item total correlation varying from r =.50 to r =.74 (ps <.01) and factor loading ranged from.39 to.73.

In phase II, internal consistency of the Urdu translated version of PLS was determined through test re-test reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Value of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale was found quite high i.e. α =.90 which considered the best (Tezbasaran, 1997).

Results indicated the good level of internal consistency in form of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α =.89).

Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the R - UCLA was.85.

In phase II, internal consistency was computed through test - retest reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

To verify the internal consistency of the ULS - 6 scores, Cronbach's coefficient alpha and item - total correlations were conducted.

Internal consistency was included the cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation respectively.

Results reported in Table 2 shows high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on the scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale (α =.90) which is quite good and high.

Mean, Standard Deviation and Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient of the Urdu Passionate Love Scale (N = 300)

Cronbach standardized alpha coefficients for friends support, family support and significant others support were.86,.86 and.89, respectively.

In the current study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for both dimensions were good (0.92 for the 18 attachment anxiety items and 0.85 for the 18 attachment avoidance items).

Scheier and Carver found that this measure has a mean Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.76 and a test — retest correlation of.79 for a period of 4 weeks.

In the present sample, the Cronbach alpha (internal reliability) coefficient for the anxiety scale was.90 and for the avoidance scale,.91.

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for masculinity was.80 and for femininity was.73.

2) Brazilian version of a general scale of relationship satisfaction (Schumm et al., 1986), translated and validated in a sample of 342 participants with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.90 (Wachelke, De Andrade, Souza, & Cruz, 2007), a measure composed by three items [«I am satisfied with my relationship», «I am satisfied with my companion in what concerns his / her role in the relationship» and «I am satisfied with my relationship with my companion»] completed in a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 = «strongly disagree» to 5 = «strongly agree».

(Cronbach's coefficient alpha).

The Chinese version of SF - 12v2 has been validated and normed in local Chinese population with Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.60 to 0.89.43 54 55

Methods: The psychometric properties of the CCI - D were tested via item analysis and reliability analysis... (Cronbach's coefficient alpha).

The tool has good psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.66 to 0.94.47 Its Chinese version has been used in local Chinese children.43 48