The next generation of
CubeSat students will get their satellites into space even more efficiently, as improving technology makes launches economically and environmentally easier.
Not exact matches
In 2003, the first six
student projects rode a Russian Eurockot into orbit, for about $ 30,000 a pop; early on, the biggest single expense was the ride, though in recent years, launch prices have stayed put around $ 100,000 for a 1U
CubeSat.
«Now you're seeing not just
student projects, but
CubeSats deployed by the military, by space agencies — doing real jobs,» he says.
The
CubeSat mission, called the Colorado
Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE), housed a small telescope to measure the flux of solar energetic protons and Earth's radiation belt electrons.
QB50 is one of many projects across the globe aimed at getting
students — university, high school and even younger — involved in making and operating
CubeSats.
CubeSats started becoming part of the scientific lexicon in the early 2000s, when a Stanford professor wanted to give his
students the chance to build and work with space technology.
Since 2011, through NASA's
CubeSat Launch Initiative, 40 small spacecraft have already launched from rockets and produced years» worth of data, while teaching
students the basics of space technology.
CubeSat parts are relatively inexpensive, and the compact end products can hitch rides on rockets that already go to space, a boon to researchers and
students alike.
For instance, a simple
CubeSat built by
students or hobbyists might cost roughly $ 50,000 whereas more advanced projects from professional aerospace companies can range from $ 250,000 up to $ 2 million.