Sentences with phrase «dc appeals court ruling»

The e-discovery landscape continues to evolve, the recent DC Appeals Court ruling (click here) presents yet another twist in the ongoing saga of cost of e-discovery.....

When the DC appeals court ruled that the EPA had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases on June 26, 2012, it brought to a close a process of regulation and court challenges that started in 1999.

Not exact matches

The rules, which were upheld by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals earlier in June, ensure that internet service providers treat data equally and can not give or sell access to so - called internet fast lanes that would prioritize certain internet services over others.

These companies, which profit by legally enforcing patents they own rather than developing products, may benefit from a 31 August ruling at a US federal court of appeal in Washington DC.

The appeals court is also set to review a ruling allowing DC to sue Marc Toberoff, who represents both the Siegel family and the estate of his collaborator Joe Shuster, for interfering with its agreements with the heirs.

As super-attentive readers will know, re the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial of the century, I was not part of my fellow defendants» appeal to the DC Appeals Court to rule on whether DC's anti-SLAPP law is appealable - because I reckoned it would all prove a waste of time and, therefore, we might as well get the hell on with the trial.

These rules are still in place for now, but may be substantially weakened or overturned completely depending upon the outcome of the appeal process to a recent DC Circuit Court decision.

Little did I know that, in the dank toilet of DC justice, they can, on the one hand, have two trial judges simultaneously ruling on the same case while, on the other hand, be entirely unaware of whether their own anti-SLAPP law is appealable and thus require a decision from the Appeals Court on whether the law is appealable before the appeal can be appealed.

The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, examines in Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety (DCS), Z.D. (minor child), (2017), whether a parent's 25 minute tardiness to a juvenile court parental termination hearing constitutes a «failure to appear» within the meaning of Arizona Revised Statutes («A.R.S.») section 8 - 863 (C) and Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 66 (D)(2) for a Juvenile Court parental rights termination Court of Appeals, Division One, examines in Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety (DCS), Z.D. (minor child), (2017), whether a parent's 25 minute tardiness to a juvenile court parental termination hearing constitutes a «failure to appear» within the meaning of Arizona Revised Statutes («A.R.S.») section 8 - 863 (C) and Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 66 (D)(2) for a Juvenile Court parental rights termination court parental termination hearing constitutes a «failure to appear» within the meaning of Arizona Revised Statutes («A.R.S.») section 8 - 863 (C) and Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 66 (D)(2) for a Juvenile Court parental rights termination Court parental rights termination case.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in DC has affirmed an earlier ruling that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was wrong - in how it enforced anti-kickback rules under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA.