Sentences with phrase «does chamberlain»

theo's created three clear chances for himself in 45 minutes of football, how often does chamberlain do that?

Not exact matches

Yet for England only two wingers were chosen ahead of him sterling and championship bound townsend, sure other players like Lallana, Welbeck chamberlain and even vardy might play there, but fact is if Walcott looks at what is best to do there is 3 very confusing paths.

So chamberlain is lazy because he didn't run through the whole chelsea squad??? You my friend are clueless.

But this team against Bayern has zero pace no bellerin, theo or chamberlain and its sanchez vs lahm do we have a plan B?

How ever this line up could work if chamberlain is on the left and jacks on the right as debucy provides width but still do nt see why we have to complicate things when we can just bench wilshere.

Yeah I know players like chambers chamberlain and debuchy are all great but it does nt help to bench them all the time.

chamberlain chamberlain... someone said he has just 8 goals in his arsenal's career... hmmm... how many goals did he then score in his first season then....

I hope the acquisition of welbe and sanchez is the start of us becoming a better pressing team, with the addition of chamberlain rosicky and Ramsey we have the personnel to not only limit opposition chances but also win the ball back quickly and counter effectively, something other teams do very well against us

Do nt forget chamberlain.

I think in our whole squad we do nt have RW or LW, selling both chamberlain and walcott, was not a good idea.

People here talk about how klop has change chamberlain but I personally don't see anything special about his play.

Draxler's finishing already looks quite composed and his ambidextricity is akin to van persie's if not better, I would love to see what wenger could do with him, the line up of draxler sanchez and chamberlain with ozil just behind could be deadly

And why does nt chamberlain make any f*cking runs, he wants the ball to feet too much and hes not the only one, thats why we always pass it around for ever.

i wuldnt swap iwobi for chamberlain, I agree on ramsey and elneny tho, don't think they should be starting, wenger doesn't really helps ramsey's case either, playing him out of postion isn't helping any one, wenger betta start growing the balls to sub off ozil if he is having an off day

What a fantastic problem to have trying to fit the likes of wilshire chamberlain and Rosicky into the team, we really do have great depth in our team now to the last few players required to win the league.

Then, about player... i already said on early season we will play sanchez on suarez role, and it success... so, now we just realized that we have one more gems to work... it is chamberlain, the ox... what will we doing is, he has body type and dribble like someone star... its is hazard... from now lets give hazard role to chamberlain...

ramsey experiment has failed... had his chance did nothing... bring on campbell or chamberlain... the lack of movement of ramsey and giroud is shocking....

Sell sanchez and get sterling from mancity, don't sell perez, buy cdm, a defender and allow chamberlain to play CM till mid season, if he can't sign we can let him go.

What did Wenger actually promise Chamberlains dad when he made the deal to get him to Arsenal?

the analysis from barton is unreasonable and immature.messi scored from open play bcos he has suarez and neymar to support them who are as talented and EXPERIENCED.while chamberlain and some players do nt hav that experience or lacks form right now.the player chamberlain wa when he was signed, scoring spectacular goals and giving nice crosses, but now his form has been - do nt know wheter its bcos of low motivation levels or lack of confidence.so if sanchez had players as good as himself to support him in attack, then u will see that hes not far or i may even claim he is on same level asmsn..

A good 70 mins but another last 16 exit because we have obvious and longstanding weaknesses such as centre halfs moving at a snails pace... And Walcott has done less than chamberlain

after every comment of you i remember again and again why i hate you the most on this site ramsey was one of the best along with özil and chamberlain mostly through the right side is our most efficient attacking way right now, yeah i admit he missed a great chance but he was involved in almost every attack we produced and made some good combination play, suarez missed a great chance too, do nt be just sticking on that one miss, he defended really well and attacked good too... but no need to talk discuss: ramsey was great

DO N'T COMPARE PEOPLE TO WILT CHAMBERLAIN.

its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d point of being in d «top 10 financially rich clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll buy d odd 30m player but is it enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to buy 2 top 30m signings....

He might run down the wing to link up with a player ahead of him but, if that player is two seconds slower than chamberlain or doesn't read the play them his specific effort in that move looks to be the cause / fault.

Let's face it none of current «wingers» are actually wingers Anyway alexis, walcott, chamberlain, Campbell, gnabry and wellington all prefer to cut inside and even when Welbeck plays there he does too.

I think we could do well in 443 or 4 1 3 1 1 As in 34 coquelin 28 campble 19 carzola 16 ramsey 17 alexis 12 Giroud ozil chamberlain wacott on could bring in walcott and ozil at 50 just a thought Come Arsenal we need a win com on you the Arsenal

The team additionally needs somebody who is consistently very good at making crosses (Walcott or Belerin or Oxlade - chamberlain aren't) and deadly in taking freekicks — like Mahrez --(nobody in the team can do that at the moment)

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

How do you call yourself chimchimgiroud??? not surprised that you think that we don't need another striker because our messi will bag them in for fun... there is something called form mate and when ones hits it, its not advisable to bench or alternate him so one will obviously warm the bench for a long time but your chamberlain point is point on....

surely that was because wilshere was injured and therefore not marketable nothing to do with the fossil's favouratism... he hasnt sold carzola either... but for sure wilshere has the skills to provide a half way decent replacement for carzola whereas xhaka and ramsey and maitland niles and iwobi and chamberlain and the other average players wenger has persisted with arent in the same league

All I want is for Wenger to leave by the end of the season, look at chamberlain performing well at Liverpool, our players are not doing well under Wenger and thats why he need to leave, I don't really care who comes in, Enrique won't be a bad idea

@davidnz: roz for ozil (gives ozil a rest), campbell for chamberlain gives ox a rest (maybe he does nt need it tho)

Players like cazorla, alexis, giroud, rosicky and chamberlain have really pushed on because they work so hard when we don't have the ball.

The right wing, on the other hand, could do with a good upgrade and I believe there better options available than walcott or chamberlain.

Likewise chamberlain will do the same with the one footed stones or coleman, whilst sanchez will really upset the ageing pair of jagielka and distin with his pace, though I also have a feeling he might be rested for this one too.

Lacazette doesn't start but Alexis and chamberlain start.

Time to move on from Walcott and chamberlain and welbeck doesn't persuade even if fit....

thats the disadvantage if introducing players to the big stage when they are still teens to become starters they become injury prone they have slowed progress in their careers look at what it has done to players like gibbs fabregas walcott chamberlain welbeck wilshere

He should have brought on ramsey for wilshere, leave flamini put cazorla just by flamini and push ramsey upfront with welbeck cos one thing i know ramsey can do is nick goals, with ramsey, welbeck, sanchez and chamberlain, we would have scored earlier.

Wengers past 13 seasons I've seen leceister city win the league, Jose win leave come back amd win the league gets fired and prolly be in a better position to win the league next season, south Hampton get promoted and become a stable club, oh yea leceister too, pep struggle in a league (still finished above us) Chelsea change managers and Yh they won too, Tottenham just basically becoming a better side plain and simple smh, Liverpool and Everton go through management changes and still be competitive while we're here struggling to just to even compete in our own league and getting embarrassed in europe and now as a fan we don't only have to worry about us getting players and other clubs hijacking our targets (just as every season thus far) but probably losing two of our best players and a slew of others including one our better performers in oxlade - chamberlain and our immovable manger is still showing how not to win the league and gets a bumper new deal for his struggles

the guy needs to let his feet do the talking but for the moment chamberlain should start ahead of him... wenger has staked the last 5 years on having only 3 clubs vying for 3rd and 4th and scraping in... this year there are realistically 5 clubs in that hunt and with our defensive line up accidents are guaranteed to happen....

Not only do arsenal have their full 25 man quota, but we can also list a far bigger b list than our rivals and that is also far stronger, including players like chamberlain and gnabry.

let me tell you the truth, go and do research on every world class player, you will no that akpom is also going to be average player (like welbeck, chamberlain, etc) or close (near) to world class player (like walcot, ramsey, gibbs, wilshere, etc) because 1.

GUNFEST - I do nt know who is pulling the cords at the top level, but we have hear wenger saying we do nt need this player and having chamberlain, diaby and polodski come back is like a new player and Ivan gazidis coming out and saying the money is available for wenger to use, 40 million or can afford rooney that sort of crap!

I believe the board don't give a *** about the fans because if they does Arsene wenger should have been sacked long time ago it's obvious the french man has seen it all and have nothing new to offer the club he has passed his prime and need to resign and go take a rest the players in arsenal are just average imagine the wacott Ramsey chamberlain all is championship materials and not premiership for arsenal to revitalise they need to buy players great players at such except that I'm afraid we wl keep having the same result and be content with 4th position year in year out.

KRISTINA CHAMBERLAIN: Well sometimes moms will deal with it more in the first couple of months just while their bodies and babies and still you know figuring out what's the supply and demand is, so, a lot of times after the baby's hit you know the 2 or 3 months mark that starts to get better just because again moms and babies bodies are you know dancing together a little bit better they're getting more in to rhythm, so sometimes that the time and then in itself will kind of resolve it as baby gets bigger and kind of figures that out but if after the 2 months mark it's still an issue when it's making nursing hard for mom and baby I would say then start doing some of the things that we talked about to be a little bit more assertively treating it

KRISTINA CHAMBERLAIN: Someone can a apply medication especially if that would be the last resort I mean the other thing is you have a little bit of control over with trial and error you know you try something, you see how it's working, if it's not doing what you wanted to do you stop or you know your body doesn't take too much of a ding from it but if you're doing medications then it takes longer for you to rebuild it.

KRISTINA CHAMBERLAIN: Well the causes aren't really known but it does tend to coincide most of the time with oversupply so there's probably some kind of connection to that feedback inhibition of the letdown of lactation that I was talking about.

KRISTINA CHAMBERLAIN: Well, nipple shield do come in different sizes as your nipples.