Sentences with phrase «damage limit component»

In a recommended 300 / 300/100 split limit, 100,000 is the Property Damage limit component, with $ 300,000 of Bodily Injury per person and $ 300,000 per accident.

Not exact matches

These include, but are not limited to, damages or injury caused by error, omission, defect, failure of performance, delay in operation or transmission, line failure or computer virus, worm, or other harmful component.

The analysis ensured that «all materials will stay below their temperature limits and that stresses caused by thermal expansion will be low enough to avoid component damage.»

There are damaging components, from mandating more district laws on charters to limiting the ability to hire talented but uncertified teaching staff.

This Limited Warranty and / or the New Vehicle Limited Warranty on your vehicle may be voided, either in whole or in part, where the vehicle has been damaged due to a consumer's failure to modify the vehicle properly as necessary for use of Ford Performance parts and components.

Vehicle damage caused by a consumer's failure to modify the vehicle properly for use of one or more Ford Racing parts and components is not covered by this Limited Warranty and is the sole responsibility of the consumer.

, its affiliates or its agents be liable for any direct, special, indirect, consequential or other damages of any kind that arise out of or in connection with (i) any use of this website or content found herein, (ii) any failure or delay (including, but not limited to the use of or inability to use any component of this website for orders) or (iii) the performance or non performance by Northern California Border Collie Rescue

Granted, the fire arrow will be your best friend — setting tougher enemies ablaze is a great way to limit their effectiveness and deal damage — but things like corrupting machines into facing each other and blowing off critical components with the tearblast arrows are simply tremendous fun.

In a 8 - 0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that damages for infringement of design patents under 35 U.S.C. § 289 can be limited to the defendant's «total profits» from the article of manufacture that contains the patented design, which may only be one component of a commercial product, rather than...

In a 8 - 0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that damages for infringement of design patents under 35 U.S.C. § 289 can be limited to the defendant's «total profits» from the article of manufacture that contains the patented design, which may only be one component of a commercial product, rather than the entire product.

The decision is likely to provide a platform for the Federal Circuit to limit available damages in design patent cases involving complex products, such as where an infringed patent covers design elements present only in individual components of the product.

Although Congress amended Section 289 in 1887 to overrule cases limiting damages to profits «due to» an infringed design, the Court focused on the phrase «article of manufacture,» and said damages may be limited to articles of manufacture that are mere components not separately sold to end users in certain instances.