Sentences with phrase «deals are done between»

Deals are done between PEOPLE.

Several reports suggested a deal was done between Arsenal and Rennes however no move ever materialised, but there are lots of reasons for this.

Not exact matches

The absolute dollars will matter for sure and sometimes there's just too much distance between the parties to get the deal done.

But although Canada's real national pastime is played on the green, in the tax man's eyes business deals conducted between swings aren't equal to those done at the rink.

We could at any time do one of the larger deals but it wouldn't surprise me if there is space between them.

Also, some of the celebrations will be toned down out of respect for those dealing with Isaac wherever it does make landfall — currently estimated to be somewhere between New Orleans and the Florida Panhandle.)

As Matthew McClearn explains, the latest deal between European leaders is itself incremental and does little to resolve the underlying issues threatening the region.

If trade is voluntary and NAFTA is a «bad deal» for the U.S., as President Trump has said, then why does any trade between Mexico and the U.S. take place?

Well, if the Petro - Dollar deal was between the US and Saudis, why would any country doing business in Oil - outside of S A - be forced to use American Petro Dollars - in the first place?

Leslie Jamison, a writer, shares how she navigated between the worlds of elite schools and service jobs, all while dealing with alcoholism: «I didn't just want to be good.

But Trump did not explain why, amid a week of economic saber - rattling between the two countries that shook global markets, he felt confident a deal could be made.

Going into the Algiers OPEC meeting in late September, the prevailing sentiment among the analyst community was that there is no way any deal will get done: after all there was no secret that the recent animosity between Iran and Saudi Arabia had recent reached unprecedented levels, with both side directly involved across from each other in the Syrian proxy war.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for yodo starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for yodo nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

Indonesia and Australia are pushing to get a free trade deal done by August, leveraging off the strong relationship between Prime Minister M...

So I suspect some VC's will continue doing deals that are on the border between what an angel would do and what a VC would do.

«We did have some Chinese buyers but they were few and far between, and I think our agents were a little bit unsure on how to deal with the financial aspect and all of that.

The disparity between the sellers who are doing their only transaction vs. buyers who are always doing deals and have choice.

If the deceased did not choose to be baptized while alive, then it is a done deal and is between him and God.

Novak does not hesitate to admit that there is a great deal of historical evidence suggesting a peculiar connection between the Protestant ethic and capitalism.

It is not the churches job / function to judge, however I do think there is a stark difference between one who is embracing and seems unwilling to «deal» with that sin, and those who have recongnized their particular sin and are working through it.

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

I don't know if that definition is right or wrong, but I do know that it has a great deal to say, underneath, about the relationship between culture and spirituality, about what you do with what you are and why you do it.

I'm afraid that your «so what, we'll just deal with it... somehow» doesn't quite represent or give credibility to an on - going and ever - evolving problem between the crazies, whether they be Christians or Muslims, who may very often value «death» more than life, and have no problem blowing themselves up and taking us and many other innocents with them.

Here there is no claim to privileged access to the ding an sich, for any such dichotomy between noumenal and phenomenal is absurd — what a thing is is known in, and consists of, what a thing does; or, in Christian terms, we know God in terms of His activity in the world, working towards communities or societies of shared good in spite of the recalcitrance, the back - waters, the negativities, or compendiously «the evil», with which he has to deal.

Moreover, is it well to remember that our belligerent spirit in relation to all communist regimes did a great deal to harden the world's polarization between «East» and «West.»

That is to say, wherever we think we are dealing with realities, we do have to distinguish between better and worse ways of conceiving them and dealing with them.

The entire story is given to us in the Old Testament material, including as it does much genuine history as well as a good deal of legend and myth, not to speak of poetic expressions of the relationship between Jahweh and humankind but with reference also to non-Jewish races and nations.

During the years between the completion of SMW and the publication of PR, Whitehead tried out an idea that he does not seem to have included in his final synthesis.18 «Whenever the «all or none» principle holds, we are in some way dealing with one actual entity, and not with a society of such entities, nor with the analysis of components contributory to one such entity» (S 28).

About two - thirds of white evangelicals said they don't believe Islam is a part of mainstream America; a whopping 72 percent said, «There is a natural conflict between Islam and democracy; 38 percent believe that «half or more U.S. Muslims are anti-American»; 51 percent believe there is a «great deal / fair amount of extremism among U.S. Muslims»; 63 percent said «Islam encourages violence more than other faiths.»

The opposition is between the view that the further back you go, you go to more and more rudimentary judgements and the view that there is a real difference between perception and thought; and also that you don't in perception come down to a (Kantian) inchoate manifold which you work up with conceptual schemes, but that you come down to something given in sense - awareness about which you can say a great deal more than that.

The last element of analysis has to do with the particular theological heritage that has influenced many of our congregations, especially in regard to two issues The first is the false spirituality that sees little connection between faith and questions of material well - being, the environment, and so forth ~ The sermon deals with that by stressing God's concern for all of creation, even the animals.

The human polytheists, in practice, have a great deal in common with the Abrahamic monotheists of Planet Earth: They're a people of the book, divided between fundamentalists who take the sacred scrolls literally and more latitudinarian believers who don't, and divided, as well, on all the culture - war questions — notably abortion — that divide our own semi-Christian West.

Hey there was twenty years between in this guys supposed life there is no history for so yeah there's all kinds of possibilities so what if he had ten wives and 50 kids that's his business as the bible states let him deal with it heck he could have chilling in the roman bath houses that's were he learned to walk on water... And you know what happens in roman bath houses don't you there lennon

Since going GF and dealing with a multitude of other allergies and can't eats between us, this is the only completely safe, we didn't have to alter it bread recipe (except for we left out the herbamare) AND it's really good.

Ox might just reject them.However, I feel deep down that he doesn't want to stay.The deal is agreed between the two clubs but it's left for the Ox to accept or reject.

So when I heard the Frenchman being so forthcoming about the transfer talks that are going on between the Gunners and Villareal about the Brazilian defender Gabriel Paulista, I instantly assumed that the deal is all but done.

However, we all know that these deals are few and far between and that you can not expect to do all of your transfer business like that.

In this matchup between an unstoppable force and immovable object, the only way Bell wins is by legitimately convincing the Steelers he's done if he doesn't get the long - term deal.

But as reported by The Mirror that is not going to happen, as the boss explained that loan deals between EPL clubs do not work that way.

Because the manager has admitted to Arsenal Player what a lot of us were thinking before the deal was done; that he was not really sure if the Gunners really needed another man between the sticks.

Even I don't think it will be possible as wenger stated since its between EPL teams so no emergency call back, my choice should be a loan deal until end of the season with the option of permanent deal in case he's needed.

Arsenal had actually agreed a fee totalling # 55 for Lemar.Monaco pulled out of the deal and didn't want to sell anymore.They are currently demanding # 65 for him.I'm however guessing they looked at the current market.That's the same thing that happened with Chelsea and Joao Cancelo.They had previously agreed a # 25 deal but are now demanding # 10 more than the originally agreed price.This proves everything Resource and I said was right.It's funny how the media don't tell us what happens in between.

Man United currently rely a great deal on veteran Paul Scholes and do not really possess much in the way of a goal threat with the likes of Michael Carrick, Anderson and Darren Fletcher not being all that attack minded, whilst also not providing a great deal in the way of a link between midfield and attack, being more concerned with keeping hold of the ball.

However, Man United have set their stall out with this eye - watering offer, and it remains to be seen whether or not a deal can be done between the two European giants.

It remains to be seen whether or not a deal can be done though as it will undoubtedly be a controversial one given the rivalry between the two clubs, and ultimately at this stage it would seem unlikely.

Because, according to a Daily Star report which claims to have a Premier League footballer as its source, the deal that is apparently done between Arsenal and Schneiderlin will not happen until the end of the season and that leaves the fans wondering how we will cope in central midfield between now and then, especially now that we are hearing some rumours that our club captain Mikel Arteta may have suffered a setback and will be on the injury list for a few more weeks.

In response to DP94 suggesting people assist the police in dealing with criminals in their communities, you respond that Mrs Pof3 can't turn in her drug dealing husband because it's their only income followed by yet another reference to the cycle of poverty (and systemic rasism), thereby implying that these communities would be more helpful if only it didn't mean choosing between helping the police and letting their kids starve.

What do you think are the chances of this triple transfer deal between Arsenal and PSG actually happening?

With the contract talks between the player and the club still ongoing and all sorts of transfer rumours doing the rounds of the football press, Arsenal fans are already worried about this aspect of the Alexis situation and I think we will remain so until he puts pen to paper on a new deal.

Sources close to the France international are confident a deal can be done between the two clubs.