If United or Liverpool refused to have
Dean as a ref it would be granted, the whole games crooked while Mike Riley runs the PGMOL
Arsenal fans see
Dean as the ref and go «Oh!
Not exact matches
I was surprised and disappointed to see Cesc
as one of the Chelsea players most vocal in persuading Mike
Dean to send off Gabriel, and then he was at it again with his international team mate Santi Cazorla, rolling around
as if he had been cut in half to make sure the
ref produced a second yellow and clearly enjoying us going down to nine men.
My question still remains, «if there was no conspiracy, how is it possible that you use Micheal Oliver (arguably the best
ref in the world
as i know)
as the fourth official and use
Dean as the referee?
My take is that virtually ALL
refs are sub - standard and
Dean is the worst (Most of them are too old and unfit and we need far younger, ex-players fast tracked through
as refs, but that is another subject).
We understand you win first on merit, but when it's the same
ref (Mike
Dean) on a regular basis, time and time again, yes, shit needs to be said, especially when you've had
as much experience
as he has and he makes THAT call.
Had you instead said that Mr.
Dean is a poor standard
ref, with which I firmly agree,
as would I suspect most on this site, you would be on safer ground and still have made your point.
I DO, however, believe that the general standard is very poor, — and Mike
Dean among the very worst — mainly because many
refs are too old, too unfit and I say we should be fast tracking former players who have had early retirement,
as prof
refs.
You say you're also a
ref, so letting your incorrect comments go unchallenged could twist the truth more
as people are bound to pay a lot more attention to what a
ref has to say than an ordinary fan (though it shouldn't necessarily follow
as there are some
refs who are terrible, like
dean)
As for Dancing (no penalty)
Dean — I await the
ref review — but it looked like a biased performance yet again.