Dear Author points off to Digital Reader's post on the matter, and Digital Reader in turn has links off to assorted authors» commentary, notably Chuck Wendig's, which I link to because his rant IS a thing of glory.
Not exact matches
Dear PATIAT, (In response) Exactly!!!! I can't give the
author any
points for «making an effort» to offer a carnal spin on something spiritual and i never said «It's not like that» God's word does that for her BUT she must read it with a spiritual mind and let go of her carnal one.
Dear author of this article, please consider the following
points.
I know you've seen mutiple discussions on this
point at
Dear Author.
Just b / c you asked us to check you, I'll
point out that your header to the Thread C analysis reads: «Where we are: On October 20th,
Dear Author removed this case to state court.
But
Dear Author: Thank you for making the
point about always having your work in circulation.
And I'm delighted to see
Dear Author now using bylines at the tops of stories, in part as a result of our chats on this
point.
We don't have the facts at this
point for either of us to guess how far
Dear Author can get with the CDA claim.