Sentences with phrase «decision point review»

New Jersey law requires auto insurance companies to submit for approval Decision Point Review, precertification and notification requirements that then become the process and requirements for those who are injured in auto accidents and their medical providers.

Normally emergency treatment received within 10 days of the accident is not subject to the decision point review / precertification requirements.

A: The documents below provide information about Electric Insurance Company's New Jersey Decision Point Review Plan as required by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance.

Not exact matches

They didn't review what decisions were made, by whom, at what point or why.

If the meeting to review the content of the draft proposal goes well with a person that can make a decision, sellers may be able to close at that point in time.

An article in the latest Harvard Law Review points to the wider significance of the historic moment which the Hobby Lobby decision represents.

When it was revealed that rehabilitation efforts were also stopped with the decision to end the tube feedings and that even antibiotics were now considered «life support,» an editorial in the St. Louis Review (the archdiocesan newspaper) pointed out that «In a situation where the health of the patient depends not only upon food and water, but on other forms of care and treatment, the purpose of providing food and water should not be undermined by a neglect of the other forms of care.

Alcoa's US parent company is expected to make a decision on the future of its Point Henry smelter after a formal review is completed in March 2014.

A forensic assessment of the filmed recordings by father and son team (Hypothetical Premier League) of every match played in the Premiership and the critical decisions made by referees shows that Arsenal would have finished top of the League (2 points more than they got) and Leicester should have been 2nd (9 points less than they got)-- if the use of video evidence had been used to review important decisions.

This completely misses the point of judicial review, which is that it is designed to stop bad decision - making.

«Today's unanimous decision by the Court of Appeals reaffirms the State's authority to review Entergy's federal applications to continue its operation at Indian Point,» Cuomo said in a statement.

«Tories are talking about this as being a main-gate decision, a decision at which there is a no point of return in relation to Trident, and that is untrue; their own review says that they will not be having a main-gate vote,» she said,

According to a release from the Astorino administration, a tandem of lawsuits — which name Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, Indian Point operators Entergy, and the environmental group Hudson Riverkeeper — will seek to force the power plant's shutdown to undergo an environmental review process, claiming that the decision is subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act,review process, claiming that the decision is subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act,Review Act, SEQR.

The new studies emphasize that admissions committees should review applicants holistically and rely less on GRE scores in making decisions — a point that many acknowledge, but that requires significant time and energy to do well.

Ask the review officer what the major decision points were; they might surprise you!

A niche reviews site called LDSDatingSites.org points to the economic downturn and rise of hangout culture as other contributing factors in the decision of many LDS singles to remain single.

There's almost no point in writing a review of Avengers: Infinity War; Marvel's über - ambitious movie juggernaut has built momentum behind itself for 18 movies over the course of a decade, and moviegoers made their decision whether or not to see it some time ago.

There's almost no point in writing a review of «Avengers: Infinity War,» Marvel's uber - ambitious movie juggernaut has built momentum behind itself for 18 movies over the course of a decade, and moviegoers made their decision whether or not to...

There's almost no point in writing a review of «Avengers: Infinity War,» Marvel's uber - ambitious movie juggernaut has built momentum behind itself for 18 movies over the course of a decade, and moviegoers made their decision whether or not to see it some time ago.

I mentioned in my review of VF5 that, at some point a series» strange, off - putting design decisions just becomes that game's style, and can no longer be questioned or critiqued: If you didn't like endless cutscenes and almost no gameplay, then why are you «playing» a Metal Gear Solid game?

She pointed out that the California Teachers Association has racked up three wins since spring, with the appellate court's unanimous ruling to overturn Vergara, the Supreme Court's decision this week to decline to review the case and the thwarting of her own bill that would have made changes to teacher tenure and dismissal procedures.

As teachers listen to student responses to a hinge - point question or note the prevalence of red or green cards, they can make on - the - fly decisions to review material or to pair up those who understand the concept with those who don't for some peer tutoring.

With regard to English Language Learners proficiency assessments, a major decision point raised in the session was whether state - designed English language proficiency assessments would be subject to federal peer review.

In that same Amazon article, they point out, «Yes, negative reviews can hurt sales in the short term, but over the long term, allowing criticism builds credibility and helps shoppers decide what to buy, Bezos says: «We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help people make purchase decisions.»

Since rooms can vary drastically depending on the chain, it's a good idea to check reviews online and even call the hotel before making a decision about how many points to use for your stay.

I encourage you to explore the coverage policies, peruse the different plans, check out the price points, and read the external reviews before coming to a final decision.

FCm carried out a six month review of mobile phone solutions and apps currently available for the travel market before reaching the decision to partner with Mantic Point.

Eddy: Review scores matter when a campaign has been engaging with a core gaming audience, because ultimately the score does matter to that sector.However, the review isn't the singular purchase intent decision point with core gamers — that happens much earlier; andprimarily that's the job of well - messaged video content in an awareness progReview scores matter when a campaign has been engaging with a core gaming audience, because ultimately the score does matter to that sector.However, the review isn't the singular purchase intent decision point with core gamers — that happens much earlier; andprimarily that's the job of well - messaged video content in an awareness progreview isn't the singular purchase intent decision point with core gamers — that happens much earlier; andprimarily that's the job of well - messaged video content in an awareness programme.

Being that the story and character arcs are entwined into the experience, I will not spoil any major plot points or experiences, but be warned, it would be a travesty to review something like this without lightly touching upon parts of the story and design decisions.

While the decision to release a Resident Evil title — even a spin off entry — in an episodic format might still leave some gamers scratching their heads, most reviews of Revelation 2's first episode seem to be generally positive, pointing to a promising future.

I have several times criticised the structure of climate science for its near absence of review points and its near absence of decision points that say «Go» or «No - go».

The Ostrander Point decision has the potential to return relevancy to the Tribunal review process, according to Gillespie.

The Environmental Review Tribunal also noted in its decision on Ostrander Point that approvals of renewable energy projects must seek balance between the government policy of encouraging clean power generation and protecting the environment.

WHAT IT MEANS The decision by the Environmental Review Tribunal — written by Heather Gibbs and Robert Wright — fundamentally alters the future for Ostrander Point, and has the potential to disrupt other projects involving land where Blanding's turtles are known to nest, including White Pines and Amherst Island.

From an economics point of view, Martin Weitzman has been at the forefront of attempting to work out how to fit black swans into economic analysis of risk and decisions (his review in Nature of Lomborg's new book gives a very concise statement of his views, which are worked out in more detail in his scholarly writing).

He also points to a recent paper that had questioned Christy and Spencer's decision to use preliminary data in their congressional testimony while it was still in the peer review stage: [44]

Of course, the success of this focus on melding natural and social sciences for the purpose of decision - making depends on the existence and effective use of the work of the relevant social scientist experts, as we pointed out earlier in our review comment on the draft plan.

On the face of it, that should not apply to every unsolicited document submitted, especially one that failed internal review and clearly had no influence whatsoever on the agency's decision, as many of the more sensible commentators have pointed out.

In its review of the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board faulted Enbridge's «culture of deviance» for what happened, pointing out that the response team in the first hours consisted of four local pipeline maintenance employees who were inadequately trained and made a series of bad decisions.

As Mark Chussil points out over at the Harvard Business Review, it isn't as if you can run a double - blind real - world study where one group of people makes one decision and the other group makes another, and you track the results.

That said, in other statutory contexts where the second decision replaces the first, there may be no point in reviewing the first decision.

The lawyers for the Government are at the point now where they would rather throw in the towel than try and justify some of the embarrassing review decisions in Court.

On this point readers should review my summary of the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., 2012 ONCA 425.

As a refresher, Dunsmuir held that certain presumptions will point to the applicable standard of review; the level of deference afforded to statutory administrative decision - makers.

This point goes to a tension in Doré between the duty of administrative decision - makers to consider Charter values and the role of a reviewing court which has to assess the reasonableness of the resulting decision and whether a proportionate balance was reached.

Natasha Bakht and Jordan Palmer point out in a 2015 journal article in the Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues, that the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. Kapp and Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, and subsequent jurisprudence, likely make the analysis in Duarte obsolete.

The Court of Appeal unanimously overturns the chambers justice on this point, and rules the applicable standard of review to apply to the Minister's decision is reasonableness.

Then in 2011 Justice Rothstein, this time writing for the majority in Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v Alberta Teachers» Association, 2011 SCC 61, wrote that the principle of judicial deference asserted in Dunsmuir had evolved to the point where there is a presumption the standard of review is reasonableness where a statutory decision - maker applies and interprets its home statute (at para 39).

«From my review of the Supreme Court decisions on point, it appears that a party may only rely on hypotheticals to establish a factual foundation for a Charter challenge where actual facts are not available to that party....

For those reasons at least, the creation of the focal point and the Office of the Ombudsperson can not be equated with the provision of an effective judicial procedure for review of decisions of the Sanctions Committee -LSB-...].»