On November 1, 2008, Mr. Gordon's company sold assets of a business to the Defendant corporation and Mr. Gordon was hired to continue with
the Defendant in a written contract of employment.
Not exact matches
For example, instead of
writing «Plaintiffs allege that
defendant breached the
contract,» or «The judge found that
defendant violated the statute,» lawyers will bury the verbs allege and violated
in abstract - noun phrases: «Plaintiffs make the allegation that
defendant breached the
contract,» and «The judge found that
defendant was
in violation of the statute.»
The plaintiff, Sunshine Pascua, was employed as a full - time nanny and live -
in caregiver for the two children of the
defendant, Michelle Khul - Schachter, also known as Shashena, pursuant to a
written employment
contract.
(a) that the Claimants
contracted with the
Defendants to purchase package holidays at the Club Aguamar Hotel and stayed at the Club Aguamar Hotel between the dates set out
in the schedule to the order, and (b) that the Claimants suffered gastric or other illness of various durations, and / or personal injury, and / or distress, inconvenience, loss and damage as a result of improper performance of the provision of services under the holiday
contract,
in respect of which the Claimants hold the
Defendant liable (i) under the Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992, and / or (ii) by reason of breaches of the said
contracts of various dates for the provision of holidays, made
in writing, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, and / or (iii) by reason of the
Defendant's negligence during the said period, and / or (iv) by reason of the
Defendant's misrepresentations made on various dates and inducung the Claimants to enter the said
contracts for the provision of holidays.
«
In my view the plantiff's claim discloses a cause of action in breach of contract against the defendants,» wrote Justice Campbel
In my view the plantiff's claim discloses a cause of action
in breach of contract against the defendants,» wrote Justice Campbel
in breach of
contract against the
defendants,»
wrote Justice Campbell.
to appeal den., 95 N.Y. 2d 759)- where broker's original agreement was validly terminated prior to the
contract that led to the subject sale, any other agreement between the parties for the payment of a brokerage commission would be governed by the Statute of Frauds and the broker's claims are barred since the broker has not alleged,
in connection with the alleged subsequent agreement, the existence of some
writing evidencing
defendant's intention to be bound; since alleged subsequent agreement is void by reason of the Statute of Frauds, broker can not use the same alleged promises as a basis for a cause of action sounding
in quantum meruit
Curtis Properties Corp. v. Greif Companies (236 A.D. 2d 237)- cause of action
in quantum merit reinstated (see, Curtis Properties Corp. v. Grief Companies [212 A.D. 2d 259]-RRB-; broker engaged as exclusive buyer's agent; broker may proceed both on breach of
contract and quasi-
contract theories where there is a bona fide dispute as to the existence of a
contract or the
contract does not cover the dispute
in issue; quantum meruit recovery is proper where the
defendant wrongfully has prevented the plaintiff's performance of a
written agreement; broker negotiated lease terms for principal with a third party which principal used to negotiate their own lease terms with their current landlord.