In this week's case (Drover v. BCE Inc.,) the Plaintiff sued various
Defendants challenging system access fees collected by cellular companies.
Not exact matches
«What particularly disturbs me,» Judge David T. Stitt stated in the summary of the Chreky case, «is that most of the people coming through our
system, particularly criminal
defendants, do not have the resources to mount the kind of
challenge to the DNA test results as was done in this case....
Justice Moldaver then turns to what is described as practical considerations for law enforcement and the administration of justice, at paras. 183 - 6, suggesting that (a) the disclosure of text messages received by a complainant could be
challenged by a sender who is alleged to have abused the complainant and thus exposes vulnerable complainants such as children, people with mental disabilities and the elderly (b) the increased need for warrants could strain police and judicial resources in an overburdened criminal justice
system and (c) at the trial stage, these repercussions could complicate and prolong proceedings where
defendants have standing to
challenge searches conducted against collateral targets in large prosecutions.
He commenced his lawsuit against the
defendants in January 1996, but being unrepresented without a lawyer, he has faced
challenges and delays in navigating the court
system.
That makes it a poor tool for
challenges to entire indigent defense
systems and a favorite tool of
defendants in those
challenges.
Whether the
challenge of legal practice in administrative law with comment dockets numbering in the tens of millions, protecting fundamental legal principles in practices using complex software
systems controlling the fate of
defendants, or improving and expanding access to law and policy services, the paper describes the expanding role of computer science and law and a path forward for legal practitioners in the computational age.