Sentences with phrase «defended infringement claims»

Not exact matches

You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Franklin Templeton, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and each of its and their officers, directors, employees and agents, from and against all claims, demands, liabilities, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or related to (i) your improper access to or use of this Site, (ii) any violation by you of these Terms of Use, (iii) any User Content that you Submit to or via the Site or (iv) any actual or alleged infringement or violation by you of the intellectual property or other proprietary right of any third party.

You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company, its web site (s) and each of its respective advertisers, partners, suppliers, licensors, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, representatives, contractors, agents and sub-licensees, from any and all claims (including but not limited to claims for defamation, trade disparagement, privacy and intellectual property infringement) and damages (including attorneys» fees and court costs) arising from or relating to any allegation regarding: 1.

I fully indemnify, defend and hold harmless Car Throttle (and any third parties authorised by Car Throttle using or exploiting the Content), their respective officers, employees, successors, licensees and permitted assigns from and against: (a) any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense arising from actions brought by any third parties arising from any breach of any of the representations, warranties or agreements made by you; (b) any claims of or respecting slander, libel, defamation, invasion of privacy or right of publicity, false light, infringement of copyright or trademark, or violations of any other rights arising out of or relating to any use of the Content as authorised herein.

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Action Network Group and its affiliates and their officers, directors, employees, consultants, agents, licensors, and suppliers from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses, liabilities, settlements, litigation, damages, and / or costs (including, but not limited to, fees, costs and other expenses of attorneys and expert witnesses) arising out of or related to: (i) your use of the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, (ii) any violation of these Terms of Use or applicable law by you in connection with your use of the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, (iii) any actual or alleged infringement by you, or any person accessing the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, using your password or account identifier, of any intellectual property or privacy or other right of any third party, or (iv) any unauthorized use of password protected Materials or User Content utilizing your account information, whether or not known or authorized by you.

By submitting images to Mass Audubon Picture This photo contest (hereafter referred to as «the photo contest»), participants agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Mass Audubon, its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and representatives, from any and all third party liability for any injuries, losses, claims, actions, demands or damages of any kind arising from or in connection with the photo contest (collectively, «Losses»), including without limitation any third party claim for copyright infringement or a violation of an individual's right to privacy and / or publicity right.

What would be interesting about filing a copyright infringement against Shire City would be that every argument they used to defend their use would be an argument against their own claim to trademark validity.

Prince (and Gagosian) famously defended US infringement proceedings over the artist's «Canal Zone» series in a claim brought by French photographer Patrick Cariou.

You shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Tiny House Design & Living LLC from and against any suit, proceeding, claims, liability, loss, damage, costs or expense, which Tiny House Design & Living LLC may incur, suffer, or be required to pay arising out of such infringement or suspected infringement of any third party's right.

If the content of your entry is claimed to constitute infringement of any proprietary or intellectual proprietary rights of any third party, You shall, at your sole expense, defend or settle against such claims.

By entering, participants agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Scenic Hudson, its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and representatives, from any and all third party liability for any injuries, loss, claim, action, demand or damage of any kind arising from or in connection with the competition (collectively, «Losses»), including without limitation any third party claim for copyright infringement or a violati

Defending MasterCard International in two cases against claim of infringement of patent relating to use of a smart card in a system for automatic connection to a network.

At the trial and appellate levels, he has successfully defended clients in shareholder derivative suits, trademark infringement claims, breach of contract and negligence suits.

Prosecuting and defending IP infringement claims, including trademark, copyright, patent (including patent trolls), and trade secret litigation, in both State and Federal Courts throughout the United States and in front of the USPTO.

Defended group buying company in multiple cases involving claims for patent infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets.

«One of my more memorable cases was defending multiple television networks and a former television executive against claims of copyright infringement related to a popular reality television show.

Our lawyers have significant experience in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and trademark infringement cases, unfair competition actions, Internet and technology disputes, franchise disputes, false advertising claims, litigation concerning trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and other claims relating to intellectual property.

Also in the last couple of years, Justice Mosley, in NOV Downhole Eurasia Limited v. TLL Oil Field Consulting, 2014 FC 889, considered whether a pleading ought to be struck that referred to the file history to defend against infringement arguing that a feature added during prosecution and appearing in each of the claims did not exist in their device.

Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of patents.

Among other things, he has defended corporations and executives in federal, state, arbitral and regulatory claims involving franchise disputes, unfair competition, breach of contract, tortious interference, fraud, bad faith, professional malpractice, trademark infringement, business divorce, commercial real estate and leasing disputes, non-compete covenants, RICO laws and Qui Tam statutes.

He has prosecuted and defended cases involving claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition, securities and common law fraud, and other business related torts.

Represented leading footwear company in defending against federal trademark, trade dress, and design patent infringement claims brought by competing footwear manufacturer.

He has represented manufacturers of skin care products, including sunless tanning lotions, sunscreens, and moisturizing lotions, in eliminating trademark infringement and copyright violations on the internet, as well as defending claims of false labeling, false advertising and unfair competition.

(won patent infringement judgment involving virtual storage systems and successfully defended against antitrust claims) Waner v. Ford Motor Co. (defended patent infringement case involving heavy - duty trucks) Palmer v. Fox Software (successfully defended breach of fiduciary duty claims) Expeditors v. Vastera (successfully defended trade secret claim involving import / export regulations and logistics)

The Court's opinion in SCA Hygiene did note that an accused infringer can still defend against a claim of infringement based on the defense of equitable estoppel.

Advising and representing a global technology company in a number of patent litigations, including defending it against standard - essential patent assertions and against the largest ever damages claim brought in patent infringement proceedings in Germany.

Part of team defending client in Ohio federal court against claims seeking hundreds of millions of dollars for patent infringement.

Acted for a national transport related business in defending it against a patent infringement claim

He also helped defend a Fortune 500 digital vapor cigarette manufacturer in a patent infringement case by preparing invalidity contentions, helping formulate claim constructions, and assisting with several inter partes review petitions.

Successfully defended leading seller of home fitness equipment against patent infringement and state law claims relating its distribution of popular fitness equipment in which district court granted summary judgment and Federal Circuit affirmed.

Act for Celador Productions Ltd and its former director defending a claim for breach of confidence and copyright infringement in respect of a TV show format

In 2017, Ms. Cappella was named among the «Top Women Lawyers» in California by the Daily Journal in recognition of her impressive work defending high - profile clients in high - stakes patent infringement claims.

We are counsel to some of the largest corporations in the U.S. in defending against claims of copyright infringement.

The specificity of a complaint directly impacts the cost of defending a case: each combination of claim, product, and feature must be separately analyzed for infringement and invalidity purposes.

He has extensive experience of defending and prosecuting cartel infringements before the competition authorities and courts as well as follow on and standalone claims for damages.

A small claims court for patent litigation could, if properly set - up, level the playing field for infringement defendants, allowing them to cost effectively defend themselves and challenge the validity of patents.

For example, the Innovation Act included provisions that would allow a manufacturer to step into the shoes of its customer and defend its products against claims of infringement.

From defending against antitrust claims and overturning burdensome local ordinances to stopping online copyright infringement of MLS listing data, associations seek NAR funding for roughly a half - dozen cases a year.