Sentences with phrase «defending fee application»

Baker Botts tried again, after ASARCO, to gain fee entitlement for «fees on fees» defense work by structuring a provision in its retention that allowed for a 10 % Fee Premium with respect to aggregate fees, a Fee Premium which would be waived if BB did not incur material fees and expenses from defending its fee applications.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Baker Botts v. Asarco, holding that professionals retained in bankruptcy cases can not receive compensation for the costs of defending their fee applications.

Not exact matches

[1] The Applicant -LRB-...) challenges the enforceability of a contingency fee agreement she entered into with her solicitor in defending a forfeiture application made by the Crown.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve whether bankruptcy judges have discretion under Bankruptcy Code section 330 (a) to award bankruptcy attorneys fees and costs for defending fees / expenses which are the subject of fee applications for «core» fees.

On October 2, 2014, we posted on SCOTUS granting certiorari with respect to a Fifth Circuit decision denying Baker Botts substantial fees and costs in defending their core application fee efforts.

Such expenses include the costs for notarizing fraud affidavits; certified mail sent to law enforcement, financial institutions and credit agencies; lost income resulting from time off work to meet with law enforcement or credit agencies; loan application fees for reapplying for a loan; and reasonable attorney fees incurred to defend lawsuits brought against the insured and to remove criminal or civil judgments.