Not exact matches
So the pre-election Republican position,
backed by allies such as the Chamber
of Commerce, to extend all
of the tax cuts and postpone all
of the spending cuts until the leaders work
out a
deal is not likely to win over many
Democrats, who seem more inclined to let the tax cuts expire and start from scratch next year, presumably making it harder for Republicans to resist.
The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has
of forming a government - with 198 seats
out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers
of other MP's decided to
back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event
of the next election going exactly the same way in terms
of votes then 214
out of 650 is 32.93 %
of seats compared to at 198
out of 646 seats - 30.65 %
of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number
of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal
Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to
back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a
deal with the DUP which would only add the
backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
Accordingly, a majority in all seats — reaching two thirds in the Conservative - Liberal
Democrat battleground — agreed that «it is right to start cutting
back on public spending now because the longer we put off
dealing with the deficit the greater the cost
of sorting it
out».
With the Tories coming
out as the biggest party in terms
of votes and seats, the assumption from those
backing Mr Cameron to stay in Number 10 is that «if the seats are there,» the Liberal
Democrats will do another
deal with Cameron and we'll have coalition 2.0.
Actually, the reason that they had «local control» in the south was the Compromise
of 1877 which was a backroom
deal between the Republicans and the
Democrats to let Rutherford B. Hayes (who lost the election) become president if the federal government pulled all troops
out of the south and let the
Democrats take
back control over the state legislatures.