For the most part that won't involve either battle royale or deal - cutting with Obama; it will involve putting up legislation that Senate
Democrats filibuster.
They never mention that in 2013
Democrats filibustered a bi-partisan bill I supported that made gun trafficking a federal crime
When the Democrat president Lyndon Johnson finally decided to give in and pass the acts (so the Dems could take credit)
Democrats filibustered the Civil Rights Acts.
Not exact matches
Through the budget reconciliation process — which would avoid a drawn - out fight and
filibuster by
Democrats — Republicans can adjust only parts of the law that have to do with the federal government's finances.
While Congress is in the hands of a Republican majority, getting
Democrats to go along with cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans — as is Trump's plan — will be a tough sell; while the Republicans control the Senate, the Democratic minority could
filibuster bills they don't like.
All told, 13 Republican Senators, and Oregon
Democrat Sen. Ron Wyden, had joined the
filibuster by the time Paul yielded the floor shortly before 1 a.m.
Republicans need just a simple 51 - vote total to confirm a judicial nominee after the
filibuster on lower - level court judicial nominees was killed by
Democrats when they last controlled the Senate in an effort to help move along some of Obama's nominees more quickly.
Democrats can
filibuster any legislation that goes through the normal Senate process, since Republicans only control 52 seats.
To get legislation through the Senate, Republicans would need the support of at least eight
Democrats to break an expected
filibuster.
But the Senate is expected to draft a more moderate bill to try to draw
Democrats needed to avoid a
filibuster.
But they had one problem: They held only 52 seats in the Senate; under the usual legislative process, where a bill can be
filibustered and held up if 41 senators oppose it,
Democrats could block any repeal plan.
Democrats have 54 votes — six short of the number needed to shut down a
filibuster.
The Moderates get turned off by the Party Platform and decide to return to their parent's Democratic Party roots in enough districts to return control of Congress to the
Democrats, and eliminate the threat of Republican
Filibuster in the Senate.
So,
Democrats — including several Catholics, such as Senator Tim Kaine, who are «personally» though not professionally opposed to abortion — voted to
filibuster the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, and the Republican leaders who could have moved a bump stock ban bill to the floor after the Las Vegas massacre did not.
The Senate
Democrats are
filibustering a bill to aid victims of sex trafficking, demanding that any help to victims of sex trafficking must be bundled with (extremely unpopular) government funding of abortion.
That will give the
Democrats enough votes to sustain a
filibuster.
Paul's
filibuster shone a light on drones, leading many Republicans and some
Democrats on Capitol Hill to question their use.
In a Wall Street Journal article defending the importance of the Senate
filibuster, Sasse made the case that the impulse — prevalent among
Democrats and, increasingly, Republicans — to circumvent this process in order to effectuate a particular result is in fact «radical,» not «conservative.»
Democrats will have some leverage because on important issues, they'll likely force Republicans to garner 60 votes to end
filibusters.
The federal bill that will provide New York with some $ 2.6 billion in Medicaid and education aid just passed the US Senate 61 - 39 (no surprise, as that was the same as yesterday's cloture vote in which two moderate Maine Republicans joined with the
Democrats to end the GOP
filibuster).
Could the Republicans do exactly the same to Sen. Murphy, and every other
Democrat who speaks out, thus effectively bringing an end to debate and preventing a
filibuster, with their simple majority?
I would also like to add to @sabbahillel's answer that when the
Democrats last controlled the Senate, they changed the Senate rules and eliminated the
filibuster on federal judge appointments to make it easier for the Senate to approve the appointments of the Obama administration.
U.S. Senate
Democrats appeared to secure the votes necessary to
filibuster the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch, sending the body hurtling toward a bitter partisan confrontation later this week.
In November 2013, Senate
Democrats used the nuclear option to eliminate
filibusters on executive branch nominations and federal judicial appointments other than those to the Supreme Court.
On November 21, 2013, the Senate used the so - called «nuclear option», voting 52 - 48 — with all Republicans and three
Democrats voting against — to eliminate the use of the
filibuster on executive branch nominees and judicial nominees, except to the Supreme Court.
At the moment the
Democrats do not have the ability to
filibuster for court nominations (except scotus)
Note that the
Democrats forced a rule change in order to prevent a
filibuster on certain kinds of votes
keeping hurricane relief separate from the debt ceiling, and combining the raising of the debt ceiling with spending cuts (potentially eliminating the
Democrat ability to
filibuster since they could not block raising the debt ceiling),
«
Democrats must
filibuster,» she wrote in the petition - gathering email.
In 2013 in response to the Republicans rejecting President Obama's nominees, Senate
Democrats reduced the vote to halt a
filibuster to confirmation of certain government positions to 50 votes.
Seven Republicans joined 54 Senate
Democrats in the 61 - 30 vote to prevent any
filibuster of the bill.
With so much on the line, Senate
Democrats on the Foreign Relations Committee like Mr. Kaine had hoped to not only rally the 34 senators needed to sustain a presidential veto, but also to possibly keep enough
Democrats behind the president to
filibuster a resolution of disapproval next month.
Trump was referring to the so - called nuclear option, whereby the Senate leader would change the chamber's rules to prevent
Democrats from
filibustering the nominee.
I fully expect that Senate
Democrats are going to use the
filibuster as much as possible to stonewall Trump appointees to the courts.
The fruit of these efforts is not the hoped - for Republican governing majority, but the real prospect of a
filibuster - proof
Democrat majority in 2009.
Senate
Democrats have threatened to
filibuster any provision providing money for the wall.
The House passed a $ 154 billion bill in December, but momentum has stalled in the Senate, where
Democrats recently lost their 60 - vote
filibuster - proof edge.
Axelrod also said Sunday that Senate Republicans should not
filibuster Sotomayor's nomination, even though
Democrats in the Senate have mounted
filibusters against Republican judicial nominees in recent years.
Senate
Democrats including Sen. Charles E. Schumer were exultant last week after a 15 - hour
filibuster yielded the seemingly impossible: A commitment to hold votes to expand gun - purchaser background checks and keep potential terrorists from buying guns.
As a result of the
Democrat's
filibuster over the Obama - era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program, 60 votes were needed to pass the measure, making it impossible for Republicans to pass the continuing without at least some Democratic support.
«Specter's decision would give
Democrats a 60 seat
filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming
Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota.»
WASHINGTON — When Senate
Democrats in 2013 drastically weakened the ability to
filibuster presidential nominees, it seemed as if they were creating a glide path for a president whose party controlled the Senate to speed through confirmations.
Unlike the
Democrats near the beginning of Obama's term, the GOP does not have a
filibuster - proof supermajority in the Senate - or anything close to one.
Democrats need to win both to get a
filibuster - proof 60 - seat majority.
Those are the practical impacts from the nuclear option Senate
Democrats approved to end
filibusters of most presidential nominations and appointments.
Barring a Democratic wave this fall — an unlikely scenario —
Democrats will not have the votes needed to lower the
filibuster threshold.
A Senate Democratic aide noted that while
Democrats may not have enough votes to lower the 60 - vote requirement to cut off
filibusters, other reforms could prove more popular.
At least 10 Senate
Democrats oppose or are leaning against a proposal to overhaul the
filibuster rule by lowering the number to end debate.
In July 2013, the nuclear option was raised as nominations were being blocked by Senate Republicans as Senate
Democrats prepared to push through a change to the chamber's
filibuster rule.
Nearly two dozen Senate
Democrats, include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have come out and said they are willing to
filibuster.