Denying God the power to replace this world by another would be tantamount to reducing him to impotence and inactivity.
Not exact matches
They typically
denied, however, Jesus»
power came from
God.
I was dragged back into my faith kicking and screaming, no longer able to
deny the
power of
God in my life.
For me I see evolution the same as you see
God not enough proof to say I believe it and see
God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where
God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher
power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not
deny that truth.
Plantinga does believe that
God has the
power to create or not create finite, self - determining entities, but he strongly
denies that the relationship between finite, self - determining entities and
God's control over them is, therefore, not a necessary one.
I'm confused it says they will be gossips conceited unholy haters of good without love self love people in the end times to stay away not even to receive them not even pray for them is that blasphemy then it says they hold firm to a godliness but
deny its
power but I thought blasphemy they don't hold firm to any godliness but are not drawn by the spirit at all to wan na ask forgiveness even it says
god is just and will forgive why I wish he would forgive all things his children suffer over that can't change need to also it says if u can say Jesus is lord the holy spirit is with u right or u couldn't even say those words please someone help I've been suffering
For Plantinga, in agreement with Griffin, strongly differs with Leibniz (and most other classical theists) on the fundamental question of whether freedom necessarily limits
God's
power — i.e., Plantinga, like Griffin,
denies D1.
Second, the anxiety in such a perspective implicitly
denies the
power of
God to create whatever needs to be created.
To
deny God is to assume godlike intellectual
powers, in and of itself the ultimate act of conceit.
The
power that we have
denied to
God (the
power of love) is transferred to what we have made an emanation of our own, namely, the law.
It is to
deny the existence of
gods and godlike
powers.
Being grafted into the Trinity may be stated christologically without
denying the trinitarian implication spelled out in later Christian theology: I am defined by the wisdom and
power of
God revealed in the death of Christ.
To
deny god is to assume intellectual godlike
powers?
It had to do with
denying the authority and
power of
God.
Mormonism has no authoritative doctrine about how this conception occurred, but placing the origin of at least some aspect of Jesus» body in
God the Father seems to
deny the traditional teaching that Jesus was conceived solely by the
power of the Holy Spirit.
So Christians, let us follow our atheist friends in
denying the existence of this false
god of power, money, bloodshed, and violence, and instead call people to believe in the enemy - loving, all - forgiving God who is found in Jesus Christ dying on the cro
god of
power, money, bloodshed, and violence, and instead call people to believe in the enemy - loving, all - forgiving
God who is found in Jesus Christ dying on the cro
God who is found in Jesus Christ dying on the cross.
He has a form of godliness but
denies the
power of
God.
This is not to
deny the rightness of either corporate confession of guilt in public worship or individual witness to the redeeming
power of
God.
To accept evolution is asking a Christian to not only remove
God from the picture but is asking them to
deny the
power of
God.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 traitors, heady, high - minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of
God; 5 having a form of godliness, but
denying the
power thereof: from such turn away.
And if they are able to continue to gain
power, some day they may even attempt to
deny religious liberty to all the «enemies of
God.»
Jesus reveals a free
God, who is uncoopted and uncontained by those identified with religion This
God is free to hear the cry of the outcasts against the guardians of religious society This
God is not under the
power of Brahman but is free to hear ones against Brahmans and other upper castes and side with the Dalits, who are ousted from the Temples and who are
denied the right to study the Scriptures.28
While the principalities and
powers of the world, originally ordained to serve
God and
God's creation,
deny the subjectivity of the life, the people and their communities, Christ raises them up to be the subjects of sharing, sustaining and fulfilling the life in the political economy of
God.
2For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self - control, brutal, haters of good, 4treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of
God, 5holding to a form of godliness, although they have
denied its
power; Avoid such men as these.
God cements mankind into society for their greater good, while each, consenting to submit his exercise of the several
powers with which he is vested to the cognizance of the whole body, agrees to
deny himself such gratifications as are deemed incompatible with the felicity of the rest....
To neglect the world and institutional life is to
deny the sovereignty of
God over the whole of life, and to practice an idolatry which confines
God to our individual existence and limits the Christian life to individual behavior, thereby leaving the world to the principalities and
powers.
I'll mention one fundamental one: if in these contexts I take the liberty to outrightly
deny that indeed it was
God who said, and not some
power group with a dirty political agenda, then WHEN and WHY will I accept «
God said...», this and that (and particularly more positive, palatable stuff») at face value?
While the classical tradition might
deny that
God is a substance in some sense, it really has to (and sometimes does) affirm that he is a substance in a sense of a causal agent, and a causal agent must at least have
power, a property.»
It is because, for Friday to have the last word, the claim in Jesus» teaching that
God's
power is love and
God's love is powerful is totally
denied.
«The persistence of suffering seems to require us to
deny either
God's perfect goodness or his unlimited
power.»
These persons are evidence of the
power of the love of
God which can operate even when
denied a corporate home.
He could try to argue that a
God with traditional omniscience would have the
power to actualize any of the possible worlds of which he was aware and thus that those FWTs who affirm the existence of such a being really should
deny that genuine evil exists.
As long as mankind is what they are, there will NEVER be peace among us, certainly not global peace in any meaningful sense, and anyone who thinks otherwise is either dangerously naïve or pathetically stupid, frankly.Knock the dust off your Bible, Benedict!The great Apostle Paul predicted today's situatio perfectly over 2,000 years ago, and I quote: «But know this: difficult times will come in the last days.For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, slanderers, without self - control, brutal, without love for what is good, traitors, reckless, conceited, loversof pleasures rather than lovers of
God, holding to the form of religion but
denying its
power»... (2nd Timothy 3:1 - 5)- Hello!
Why don't you
god - teachers show us
god -
deniers how it's done, seeing as you have the indwelling
power of
god within you and we haven't that wonder - working
power within us?
However, they
deny that such freedom has been voluntarily bestowed by
God, maintaining instead that every actual entity (including each human) simply does possess some
power of self - determination.
We do not
deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we
deny or circumscribe His
power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to
God.»
They will praise the
power of
God and not
deny it.
Denying your life story and faith journey
denies the
power of
God in and through you.
Here Joyce also discusses the changes in Tertullian's thinking with regard to the implications of penance, between the treatises De paenitentia, written while Tertullian was still in the catholic church, where «he had expressly taught that full and entire pardon is secured by penance,» and the later De pudicitia, where he «utterly
denies the Church's
power to absolve from any sin which deprives a man of the sonship of
God conferred on him in baptism.»
I am being
denied the
power to be a joint creator with
God and bring new life into the world and instead am regulated to my own special place.
Having been overwhelmed by other nations, Israel had two choices: either acknowledge that their
gods had done the overwhelming, and thus
deny YHWH; or assert that YHWH himself had overwhelmed his own people, and thus
deny the
power of the
gods of Babylon.
2 For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self - control, brutal, [a] haters of good, 4 treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of
God, 5 holding to a form of [b] godliness, although they have
denied its
power; Avoid such men as these.
But now that Israel had been overwhelmed by these nations, one could only do one of two things: either acknowledge that their
gods had done the overwhelming, and thus
deny YHWH; or assert that YHWH himself had overwhelmed his people, and thus
deny the
power of the
gods of Babylon.
while Jesus indeed did need to wash and so did the Apostles the dirt on the outside of their body we would be
denying the
power of
God over all life if we did indeed say that disease did have its way with them.
Not that I can ever, as I said,
deny Jesus, but that sometimes I think man has written the stories in the bible to suit himself (a
power struggle to make us fit
God into a certain size box) and I want to find out as much of the truth as I can.
I think it is rather that
God energizes, in the same way he saved us, our lives «through [our] faith», which does not to
deny God's grace as the impulse to faith but
denies our faith any
power of its own to energize the life.
When the Sovereignty of
God is not recognized, the
powers become sovereign by themselves, and thus
deny the Sovereignty of the Minjung.
2 People will be self - centered and lovers of money, proud, haughty, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, irreligious, 3 callous, implacable, slanderous, licentious, brutal, hating what is good, 4 traitors, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of
God, 5 as they make a pretense of religion but
deny its
power.
They preached a doctrine that appeared wrong to the Old School Presbyterians because it seemed to
deny God's absolute
power in determining, apart from any human action, who would be saved and who would be damned.
Because the «government» has raw
power over us such
power does not establish any justification for their use of that
power to suppress or
deny God given «rights» or privileges.