Sentences with phrase «depression scale score»

A diagnosis of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder or other psychiatric disorder; caffeine, alcohol or drug addiction; or a subscale of either anxiety or depression in Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scale score ≥ 11 points;

Parents were assessed with the Family Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia.19 Teens were grouped into clinical groups based on their depressive symptoms and determination of DSM - III - R20, 21 diagnoses; details on all interviewed subjects are reported elsewhere.22 This analysis focuses on a medium depression group (n = 123 [25.9 %]-RRB-, which was called the subsyndromal group.12 These teens reported a previous depression episode or subdiagnostic levels of depressive symptoms that were insufficient to meet full criteria for a DSM - III - R affective diagnosis (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score, ≥ 24).16 Teens who met the criteria for the subsyndromal group and agreed to participate were randomized to receive either the prevention intervention program or usual care.

Participants Data from the Nord - Trøndelag Health Study 1995 — 1997 (HUNT) gave information on anxiety and depression symptoms as self - reported by 7497 school - attending adolescents (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist — SCL - 5 score) and their parents (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score).

Mothers reporting a high level of depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale score ≥ 16) reported significantly poorer prevention practices for car seat use, covering electrical plugs, and having syrup of ipecac in the home.

Patients: In total, 226 low - income mothers with clinically significant depressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale score ≥ 16) and their infants / toddlers (mean age 24.9 months) were enrolled in Early Head Start Enrichment Programmes for low - income children.

Postnatal Depression and Socio - Demographic Risk: Factors Associated with Edinburgh Depression Scale Scores in a Metropolitan Area of New South Wales, Australia.

After randomly assigning them to CCBT or the waitlist control, it was found that there were significantly greater reductions in Children's Depression Rating Scale and Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale scores from baseline to week 5 for the intervention group compared with those who waited.

A comparison of Hamilton Depression Scale scores before and after treatment showed a significant reduction in the scores for the electroacupuncture group.

Geriatric Depression Scale Scores in a representative sample of 14 545 people aged 75 and over in the United Kingdom: results from the MRC Trial of Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community.

The elevated 30 - month Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale scores in the intervention group were driven by a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms among the PP+HS group (a difference not present at baseline).

Their mothers had higher Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores (median: 8 vs 5) and more difficulties with their partner undermining the management of their child.

Not exact matches

They found that of those participants who had a bachelor's degree or higher that scored high in resilience, 8 percent were at risk for depression compared to 33 percent of college - educated individuals who scored low on the resilience scale.

Give yourself the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale - contact someone if you score is 11 or more.

Researchers observed a similar correlation between fussy eating and maternal depression: Women who experienced more depression before and after birth had children who scored higher on the fussy eating scale as well.

The study did not have enough participants to determine incidence of diagnosable postpartum depression, nevertheless, women in the treatment group had significantly lower total Postpartum Depression Screening Scale scores with significantly fewer accompanying symptoms of ddepression, nevertheless, women in the treatment group had significantly lower total Postpartum Depression Screening Scale scores with significantly fewer accompanying symptoms of dDepression Screening Scale scores with significantly fewer accompanying symptoms of depressiondepression.

We used the standard Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression Scale depressive symptom score of ≥ 16 to categorize participants as «at risk» of dDepression Scale depressive symptom score of ≥ 16 to categorize participants as «at risk» of depressiondepression.

On the respective scales utilized to test anxiety and depression, 41 percent of graduate students scored as having moderate to severe anxiety while 39 percent scored in the moderate to severe depression range.

The researchers then correlated scores on the hidden depression scale with individual trends in internet usage, grouped into three categories: «aggregate,» which indicated how much information was being sent and received over a network, «application,» which indicated the broad category of program that was being used (e.g., email, surfing the web, downloading media), and «entropy,» which indicated the degree of randomness in information flow (essentially, the extent to which someone was sending and receiving information to multiple net - based resources at once).

English - speaking mothers living in the City of St. Louis who scored above 10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) were approached to join the study by members of the research team.

Comparing scores on a depression and a suicidal ideation scale administered during the study, the researchers found there was no difference in depression or suicidality between participants who received Truvada or placebo.

Several non-motor symptom scales such as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, apathy score, and non-motor symptoms questionnaire were defined as secondary end points.

The study included 231 Chinese adults with subthreshold depression, meaning they scored between five and nine out of a total of 27 points on a standard depression scale.

Subjects who reported eating about 8 servings of chocolate per month had significantly higher scores on the depression scale compared to the non-depressed patients, who consumed an average of a little more than 5 servings per month.

Compared to the placebo group, who took a sugar pill, the probiotic takers scored significantly lower on the Ledien Index of Depression Sensitivity scale - meaning they ended up as happier (14)!

Researchers have found that adding either probiotic yogurt (100g per day) or one probiotic capsule daily significanty improved scores on the depression and anxiety stress scale (DASS)(Mohammadi, et al., 2015)

In one of my videos last year, I reported on the finding that vegetarian men and women had significantly better scores on the Depression, Anxiety, Stress scale.

Using the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression scale, the researchers found that the probability of a high depression score (more than 16) was 4-fold greater during the menopausal transition than during the premenopauDepression scale, the researchers found that the probability of a high depression score (more than 16) was 4-fold greater during the menopausal transition than during the premenopaudepression score (more than 16) was 4-fold greater during the menopausal transition than during the premenopausal phase.

All of these participants underwent formal psychiatric evaluations and met the criteria of clinical depression based on both the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD: scores greater than or equal to 21) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI: scores greater than or equdepression based on both the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD: scores greater than or equal to 21) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI: scores greater than or equDepression (HAMD: scores greater than or equal to 21) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI: scores greater than or equDepression Inventory (BDI: scores greater than or equal to 13).

Depression at screening was assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of dDepression at screening was assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of dDepression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of ddepression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of depressiondepression.

Percentages of adults with screen - positive depression (Patient Health Questionnaire - 2 score of ≥ 3) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of the effects of sociodemographic characteristics on odds of screen - positive depression; percentages with treatment for screen - positive depression and AORs; percentages with any treatment of depression and AORs stratified by presence of serious psychological distress (Kessler 6 scale score of ≥ 13); and percentages with depression treatment by health care professional group (psychiatrists, other health care professionals, and general medical providers); and type of depression treatment (antidepressants, psychotherapy, and both) all stratified by distress level.

Main Outcome Measures Depressive symptoms assessed by Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES - D) score.

Mothers were eligible to participate if they did not require the use of an interpreter, and reported one or more of the following risk factors for poor maternal or child outcomes in their responses to routine standardised psychosocial and domestic violence screening conducted by midwives for every mother booking in to the local hospital for confinement: maternal age under 19 years; current probable distress (assessed as an Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) 17 score of 10 or more)(as a lower cut - off score was used than the antenatal validated cut - off score for depression, the term «distress» is used rather than «depression»; use of this cut - off to indicate those distressed approximated the subgroups labelled in other trials as «psychologically vulnerable» or as having «low psychological resources» 14); lack of emotional and practical support; late antenatal care (after 20 weeks gestation); major stressors in the past 12 months; current substance misuse; current or history of mental health problem or disorder; history of abuse in mother's own childhood; and history of domesticDepression Scale (EDS) 17 score of 10 or more)(as a lower cut - off score was used than the antenatal validated cut - off score for depression, the term «distress» is used rather than «depression»; use of this cut - off to indicate those distressed approximated the subgroups labelled in other trials as «psychologically vulnerable» or as having «low psychological resources» 14); lack of emotional and practical support; late antenatal care (after 20 weeks gestation); major stressors in the past 12 months; current substance misuse; current or history of mental health problem or disorder; history of abuse in mother's own childhood; and history of domesticdepression, the term «distress» is used rather than «depression»; use of this cut - off to indicate those distressed approximated the subgroups labelled in other trials as «psychologically vulnerable» or as having «low psychological resources» 14); lack of emotional and practical support; late antenatal care (after 20 weeks gestation); major stressors in the past 12 months; current substance misuse; current or history of mental health problem or disorder; history of abuse in mother's own childhood; and history of domesticdepression»; use of this cut - off to indicate those distressed approximated the subgroups labelled in other trials as «psychologically vulnerable» or as having «low psychological resources» 14); lack of emotional and practical support; late antenatal care (after 20 weeks gestation); major stressors in the past 12 months; current substance misuse; current or history of mental health problem or disorder; history of abuse in mother's own childhood; and history of domestic violence.

The primary domains assessed included (1) depression symptoms as measuredby the clinician - rated HAMD and self - reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 29; (2) global functioning as measured by the clinician - ratedClinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) 30 andC - GAS; and (3) social functioning as measured by the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR).31 Higher scores on the HAMD and BDIindicate a greater number of symptoms; on the CGI and C - GAS, better functioning; and on the SAS - SR, worse fudepression symptoms as measuredby the clinician - rated HAMD and self - reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 29; (2) global functioning as measured by the clinician - ratedClinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) 30 andC - GAS; and (3) social functioning as measured by the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR).31 Higher scores on the HAMD and BDIindicate a greater number of symptoms; on the CGI and C - GAS, better functioning; and on the SAS - SR, worse fuDepression Inventory (BDI) 29; (2) global functioning as measured by the clinician - ratedClinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) 30 andC - GAS; and (3) social functioning as measured by the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR).31 Higher scores on the HAMD and BDIindicate a greater number of symptoms; on the CGI and C - GAS, better functioning; and on the SAS - SR, worse functioscale (CGI) 30 andC - GAS; and (3) social functioning as measured by the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR).31 Higher scores on the HAMD and BDIindicate a greater number of symptoms; on the CGI and C - GAS, better functioning; and on the SAS - SR, worse functioScale — Self - Report (SAS - SR).31 Higher scores on the HAMD and BDIindicate a greater number of symptoms; on the CGI and C - GAS, better functioning; and on the SAS - SR, worse functioning.

Change in score on 12 primary measures: Clinician - Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS 2) total of 3 clusters and severity, Impact of Events Scale (IES)(self rated), Beck Depression Inventory (self rated), Global Improvement scale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor raScale (CAPS 2) total of 3 clusters and severity, Impact of Events Scale (IES)(self rated), Beck Depression Inventory (self rated), Global Improvement scale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor raScale (IES)(self rated), Beck Depression Inventory (self rated), Global Improvement scale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor rascale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor rascale (self and assessor rated).

104 patients who were 18 — 70 years of age (mean age 38 y) and had panic disorder with or without agoraphobia according to DSM - III - R, a Hamilton Anxiety Scale score ⩾ 15, a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale ⩽ 20, symptoms lasting ⩾ 3 months, and no psychological treatment for panic disorder and agoraphobia in the preceding 6 months.

This scale generates scores (0 — 4) on 14 subscales of common psychiatric symptoms associated with depression and anxiety.

The range of the scores for each scale is 0 - 21 points, with higher scores indicating more adverse symptoms (i.e., higher symptoms of anxiety and depression)[20][21].

aChild Behavior Checklist for 4 - 18 years; bChildren who are currently visiting their father who used to perpetrate intimate partner violence and already separated from their mothers; cInternalizing problems = Withdrawn + Somatic complaints + Anxious / depressed; dExternalizing problems = Delinquent behavior + Aggressive behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regressionDepression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regressiondepression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regressionDepression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression analysis.

Improvement in symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High Schooldepression (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High SchoolDepression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High School Version).

Exclusion criteria: comorbid Axis I disorder during past six months; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score > 16; and cognitive and / or...

Youth baseline and follow - up interviews assessed mental health — related quality of life using the Mental Health Summary Score (MCS - 12)(range of possible scores, 0 - 100), 48,49 overall mental health using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI - 5)(range of possible scores, 5 - 30), 50 service use during the previous 6 months using the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents51 adapted to incorporate items assessing mental health treatment by primary care clinicians, 52 and satisfaction with mental health care using a 5 - point scale ranging from very dissatisfied (1) to very satisfied (5).53 CIDI diagnoses of major depression and dysthymia were evaluated at baseline and follow - up.

Inclusion criteria were a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder type I or II elicited by a trained psychiatrist (E.V. or A.B.); being euthymic (Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] score < 6, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]-- 17 score < 8) for at least 6 months; having sufficient data on the prior course of illness collected from a prospective follow - up of at least 24 months; and written consent to participate in the study.

The high correlation of EPDS scores with BDI scores (0.73) suggests that there may, in fact, be no need for a separate scale to assess postpartum depression.

Enrollment eligibility was based on youth meeting either of 2 criteria: (1) endorsed «stem items» for major depression or dysthymia from the 12 - month Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI - 12 [Core Version 2.1]-RRB- 38 modified slightly to conform to diagnostic criteria for adolescents, 39 1 week or more of past - month depressive symptoms, and a total Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES - D) 40 score of 16 or greater (range of possible scores, 0 - 60); or (2) a CES - D score of 24 odepression or dysthymia from the 12 - month Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI - 12 [Core Version 2.1]-RRB- 38 modified slightly to conform to diagnostic criteria for adolescents, 39 1 week or more of past - month depressive symptoms, and a total Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES - D) 40 score of 16 or greater (range of possible scores, 0 - 60); or (2) a CES - D score of 24 oDepression Scale (CES - D) 40 score of 16 or greater (range of possible scores, 0 - 60); or (2) a CES - D score of 24 or greater.

A lifetime history of SA was ascertained using a semistructured clinical interview established for the Munich Antidepressant Response Signature study39 and scoring points in the Hamilton Scale for Depression rating scale (score on suicide item Scale for Depression rating scale (score on suicide item scale (score on suicide item = 4).

Depressive symptoms during the week preceding the interview were measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).26 The 10 - item questionnaire was summed to a continuous score where higher scores indicated greater frequency of depressive symptoms.

Included studies used several tools for measuring the severity of depressive symptoms, namely the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM - D), 21 22 30 34 35 Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ - 9), 24 36 Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), 23 26 28 Hopkins Symptom Checklist - 20 (HSCL - 20), 37 38 Montgomery - Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 18 25 27 Beck Depression Inventory - Fast Screen (BDI - FS) 39 and Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D).40 These tools have different score ranges (HAM - D = 0 — 53, PHQ - 9 = 0 — 27, GDS = 0 — 15, HSCL - 20 = 0 — 4, MADRS = 0 — 60, BDI - FS = 0 — 21 and CES - D = 0 — 60), with higher scores in all tools representing increasing severity of depressive symptoms.

Efficacy (as a continuous outcome), measured by the overall mean change scores on depressive symptom scales (self - rated or assessor - rated), for example, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS - R) 32 and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) 33 from baseline to endpoint.

Primary outcomes: overall symptoms (positive, negative, and neurotic symptoms combined); depression / anxiety; negative and positive symptoms; overall functioning (combination of function scores from measures such as the Global Assessment Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning scale); remisScale and Global Assessment of Functioning scale); remisscale); remission.

Proportion of responders at end of treatment or at study endpoint if treatment was longer than 6 weeks (based on score improvements on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD), the Clinical Global Impression index (CGI), rating as at least «much improved» on global improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse events).