Sentences with phrase «diagnostic interview schedule»

Altogether 279 children were interviewed with the Finnish version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), and their parents with the Isle of Wight Interview Schedule.

The NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version 2.3 (DISC - 2.3): Description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study

Based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC; Shaffer et al. 2000), 73.3 % of the children met the DSM diagnostic criteria for ADHD, 65.6 % for ODD, and 12.8 % for CD.

Children with ADHD (6 — 8 years) were recruited through 43 Melbourne schools, using a 2 - stage screening (parent and teacher Conners 3 ADHD index) and case - confirmation (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV; [DISC - IV]-RRB- procedure.

Angold et al. [42] evaluated the prevalence generated by three different styles of psychiatric interviews, those based on respondents (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, DISC), those based on the interviewers (Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment, CAPA) and interviews based on «expert judgment» (DAWBA) applying them to the same sample of children and adolescents aged 9 — 16 years.

Disruptive behaviour disorders were assessed using the national institute of mental health (NIMH) diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (DISC - IV).

For instance, in a Dutch clinical sample (N = 44), the correlations (phi) between the DSM - oriented scales of ADHD, ODD, and CD and the equivalent diagnoses obtained by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC - IV) ranged from 0.43, to 0.67, p < 0.01 [24].

Symptoms were assessed with the dimensional scales of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Young Child version and the Child Symptom Inventory.

The diagnosis of disruptive behaviour disorder (DBD) was assessed by a structured interview — the diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (DISC - IV).

In a sample of 30 children diagnosed with ADHD, ADHD symptomatology was assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children — Parent Version (DISC - P), with parents and teachers as informants.

Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule

They were assessed on the Wave 3 adolescent survey using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) Predictive Scales (DPS) which have been used in previous WTC publications on children [9, 10, 26].

Data on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for mental disorders were derived from administration of selected modules of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version IV, a structured diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and adolescents.

The reliability, factor structure, and concurrent validity of the VADPRS were evaluated and compared with ratings of children in clinical and nonclinical samples on the Vanderbilt ADHD Teacher Rating Scale and the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children — IV, Parent version.

Risk factors for the incidence of social phobia as determined by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule in a population - based study

Detailed psychiatric interviews with 300 parents and children, using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, yielded a one - year weighted prevalence of one or more DSM - III disorders of 22.0 % ± 3.4 %, combining diagnoses based on either the child or the parent interview.

Because of complexity and high costs, structured clinical interviews such as the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children were not used as criterion [42].

Peer nominations of aggressive - disruptive behavior and one parent measure (the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) yielded no significant differences between the two groups.

The primary outcome measures were the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation — Revised, which measured aggressive behavior, and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, which identified conduct disorder.

Measures utilized include the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC 2.3), Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Aged Children (K - SADS - E), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Children's Global Assessment Scale (C - GAS).

Measurements include the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (CDISC), the Form 90 Interview, and urine screens.

Measures included the Youth Self - Report of the Child Behavior Checklist, the computerized version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (CDISC), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS).

Measures utilized include the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA) and the NIMH - Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) modules for major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Measures utilized include the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Parent (DISC - P) version 2, the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6 - 18 (CBCL), the Normative Adaptive Behavior Checklist, Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ), Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI), Parenting Sense of Competence Scale, Parenting Practices Scale, the Social Skills Rating Scale (SSRS), and the Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Test.

Symptoms were considered present if they were endorsed by either parent or teacher on the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale [41] or by parent response on the DSM - IV version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children [42].

Parents received the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP), the Child Neglect Index (CNI), the Abuse Dimensions Inventory (ADI), the Dyadic Parent - Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS - II), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) Alcohol and Drug Modules and Antisocial Personality Disorder Module, which were modified to be administered as self - reports.

Measures utilized include the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (CDISC), the Form 90 Substance Use Interview, the Beck Depression Inventory - II, the Youth Self - Report (YSR) / Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and a demographic questionnaire.

Measures included the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC), the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and the Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events (LITE) and were administered to participants and one of their parents / caregivers at three points in time: pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow - up.

Measures utilized include the Dissociative Disorder Interview Schedule and Dissociative Experiences Scale, Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM - III - R, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Measures used included the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI)(child & parent report), Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC)(child & parent report), Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Expectations of Therapy Outcome Scale (ETOS), Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children (TASC)(youth & parent report), Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA), PASCET Brief Adherence Scale (PBA), and Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy — Strategies Scale (TPOCS - S).

Mothers were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS - III - R) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Measures utilized include the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Second Edition (DISC - 2) and the National Youth Survey (NYS), Self - Report Delinquency Scale (SRD).

Adolescents completed the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Predictive Scales (DISC - PS), Youth Self - Report (YSR) of the Child Behavior Checklist, and Self - Report Delinquency Scale.

At baseline, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS - III - R) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered.

Measures used were the Timeline Follow - Back, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, the Parenting Practices Questionnaire, and Family Environmental Scale.

Main outcome measures included the Adolescent Diagnostic Interview (ADI - Light), the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC - IV), as well as measures of cannabis use, delinquent behavior, treatment response and recovery at one - year follow - up, and treatment intensity and retention.

[jounal] Eaton, W. W. / 2000 / A comparison of self - report and clinical diagnostic interviews for depression: diagnostic interview schedule and schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow - up / Archives of general psychiatry 57 (3): 217 ~ 222

Severity of behavioural problems on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents, and Parents (DISCAP; Holland and Dadds 1997) was used as a continuous measure of conduct problems.

All diagnoses were based on the DSM - IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association 1994) by the treating clinician during an initial assessment with parents, using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents, and Parents (DISCAP; Holland and Dadds 1997).

The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version 2.3 (DISC 2.3): descriptive, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study.

Measures included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D), Beck Depression Inventory — II (BDI - II), Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM - IV (DIS - IV), Revised Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD - R), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Social Support Behaviors Scale (SSB), Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).

Measures utilized include the Alcohol and Drug Use items from the Addiction Severity Index - Lite (ASI), the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), C - Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Substance Abuse / Dependence Module (DISC - SA), Parenting Practices Questionnaire, and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Predictive Scales (DISC - PS).

Fifty children aged 8 — 12 years with DSM - IV diagnosis of ADHD (using parent version of Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Fourth Edition) and an IQ of 75 or above (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised).

It was also notable that diagnostic data for this investigation were based on an independent, age - appropriate, interviewer - based psychiatric interview (the PAPA) different than that used in the first set of investigations (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating preschool MDD.

This course is based on the results of a study that used a computerized, self - administered version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children to screen for psychiatric disorders in youth newly admitted to assessment centers in Illinois and New Jersey.

The reliability and validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children as used in the present study are comparable to those of other structured interviews.39

At ages 11, 13, and 15 years, study members were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.23 Major depressive disorder was diagnosed according to DSM - III criteria.

The modifications and descriptive epidemiology of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children in this sample have been described by McGee et al. 24 At ages 18, 21, and 26 years, study members were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.25 Major depressive disorder was diagnosed according to DSM - III - R criteria at ages 18 and 21 years and DSM - IV criteria at age 26 years.

Study participants were asked about psychotic symptoms at the age of 11 years and were interviewed at 26 years, by using a diagnostic interview schedule.

Cigarette use was based on items from the smoking module of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), administered to subjects in adulthood by trained interviewers.34 Transitions through stages of cigarette use were assessed via retrospectively reported ages at initiation, regular use, and cessation.