Not exact matches
Why
did Charlie Munger recently say: «The current US health care system runs out of control on the cost
side and leads to behavior that's not just regrettable, but
evil.»
I see no way that ignorance and truth can be placed
side by
side, nor
do I believe that
evil is somehow less
evil if the Bible is quoted to justify it.
The film is also clear that JPII
did not see the Cold War in terms of
Evil Empire A v.
Evil Empire B; instead, he
sided with the Americans over the Soviets.
NOt all who call themselves prophets are true believers... some are just for the gains... those are persecuted... cause their
evil gets them... those who don't separate themselves from God's
side and wisdom can not be harm by
evil...
evil bows to them and allows them to pass by him unharmed... Cause
evil can not harm God... it's the law of Nature... only
evil can be harmed by
evil...
I consider that men
DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or
evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad /
evil side of the minds of the writers.
A terrible duty had to be
done and a terrible price had to be paid, and, in
doing that duty and paying that price, good and
evil were to be found on both
sides of the conflict.
I know very well that there are dark
sides to every city — I experienced the dark
side to Cambridge when I as running a hostel there, but that doesn't deny the fact that the majority of people in a city are not
evil.
Clearly my bias is showing, and there's obviously a lot more nuance to both partiest, the main issue though is that parties can be hijacked and have been on both
sides which leaves the large majority of moderates voting for the lesser of two
evils and hoping that the candidate that they vote for will drop the pandering they
did to the fringe and go moderate.
So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential
side of the problem of
evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to
do something about it when we see it.
Just because
evil is always relative
does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative
evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your
side.»
The answer is simple:
do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong
side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be
evil.
The crucial religious experiences of man
do not take place in a sphere in which creative energy operates without contradiction, but in a sphere in which
evil and good, despair and hope, the power of destruction and the power of rebirth, dwell
side by
side.
On the other
side are those who
do believe that when
evil strikes, God must have had some reason to inflict it.
The US Is not all «Christian» we have MANY religions here and so this isn't religious on the American
side, i «ts about dismantling a theocratical government that was intent upon
doing evil, and then acted upon it.
That
does not mean creation is
evil; it
does mean that a part of creation is inevitably
evil and that there is, as Melville understood, a demonic
side to God himself.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, by the Governor's Special Assistant on Public Communications and New Media, Lere Olayinka, he described Lai Mohammed as «an embodiment of contradictions, who speaks from several
sides of his mouth, turning himself to a vegetable while struggling to defend a government that has
done more
evil than good to Nigeria and its people.»
Similar to Ken Loach's I, Daniel Blake in its militantly one -
sided, good - vs -
evil approach to storytelling, the film lines up a rouge's gallery of awful, boorish, bigoted bastards and has them
do awful things to the eponymous heroine.
It's clear right from the get - go that director John Huston (who co-wrote the screenplay with Peter Viertel) isn't interested in presenting both
sides of this story - said Chief of Police is almost ridiculously
evil, completely devoid of any redeeming qualities - but that's not necessarily a bad thing, as the filmmaker
does an effective job of establishing each of these rebels (to the point where we're genuinely rooting for them to accomplish their complicated mission).
Ethan is convinced that Lena's strong spirit will direct her toward the light
side, but a family curse dating back to the Civil War suggests that Lena is fated to go dark, and her
evil mother Sarafine will
do whatever it takes to make sure it happens.
This time around, we learn that the Horsemen (Jesse Eisenberg's Atlas, Woody Harrelson's Merritt, Dave Franco's Jack, plus Lizzy Caplan as the bubbly Lula after Isla Fisher dropped out) have been in hiding for a few years, but finally have a shot at starting over on the other
side of the world in Macau if they can steal «the stick» — an all - powerful computer chip... or something like that — and deliver it to the dastardly tech guru Walter Mabry (Daniel Radcliffe) so that he could
do evil things with it.
One is that this is all incidental and happens to give them some kind of moral background to stop the killer (but they could /
do have morality coming from other sources) or Two, a propaganda film (the way most critics took it, making it one of the worst - reviewed films of Eastwood's career) that says because «God was on their
side» and the like, they were ready and even protected just enough to «defeat
evil» because of U.S. «moral exceptionalism» or the like.
The anti-corporate subtext
does give the piece a topical heft, though Verbinski and company aren't really going for any grand political statements in this purely popcorn piece other than to state that people on the
side of people are good and people on the
side of greed at the expense of people are
evil.
Terrorists and
evil - doers around the world are at large, planning their secret
evil plans to
do evil things, but thankfully the world has Giorgio Bruno on its
side and his one - man cavalcade of destruction will put all the wrongs right again.
January Dog Day Afternoon (1975, Sidney Lumet) 35 mm — 5.6 Always Shine (2016, Sophia Takal)-- 6.1 The Other
Side (2015, Roberto Minervini)-- 6.7 Silence (2016, Martin Scorsese) DP — 8.6 Hidden Figures (2016, Theodore Melfi) DP — 3.9 Lumière and Company [segment](1995, Zhang Yimou) + Café Society (2016, Woody Allen)-- 6.2 [up from 5.7] Valley of Love (2015, Guillaume Nicloux)-- 6.0 Happy Hour (2015, Ryûsuke Hamaguchi)-- 7.6 + Moonlight (2016, Barry Jenkins) DP — 6.8 [up from 6.4] Red Sorghum (1987, Zhang Yimou)-- 6.7 Live by Night (2016, Ben Affleck) DP — 4.4 Paterson (2016, Jim Jarmusch) DP — 7.2 Don't Think Twice (2016, Mike Birbiglia)-- 3.6 A Monster Calls (2016, J.A. Bayona) DP — 4.9 + Silence (2016, Martin Scorsese) DP — 8.7 [up from 8.6] Indignation (2016, James Schamus)-- 5.9 + Elle (2016, Paul Verhoeven) DP — 7.3 [same] Split (2016, M. Night Shyamalan) DP — 5.8 Ju Dou (1990, Zhang Yimou)-- 7.0 Chronicle of a Summer (1961, Jean Rouch & Edgar Morin)-- 6.9 + The Nice Guys (2016, Shane Black)-- 5.8 [down from 5.9] Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016, Taika Waititi)-- 5.2 + Cemetery of Splendour (2015, Apichatpong Weerasethakul)-- 7.4 [up from 7.2] Throne of Blood (1957, Akira Kurosawa) 35 mm — 7.0 20th Century Women (2016, Mike Mills) DP — 6.9 Tampopo (1985, Juzo Itami) DP — 6.2 Swiss Army Man (2016, Daniel Scheinert & Daniel Kwan)-- 3.1 The Bad Sleep Well (1960, Akira Kurosawa) 35 mm — 7.0 The Mermaid (2016, Stephen Chow)-- 6.0 Black Girl (1966, Ousmane Sembène)-- 7.0 Christine (2016, Antonio Campos)-- 4.4 Resident
Evil (2002, Paul W.S. Anderson)-- 6.3 Resident
Evil: Apocalypse (2004, Alexander Witt)-- 5.4 Resident
Evil: Extinction (2007, Russell Mulcahy)-- 6.6 Resident
Evil: Afterlife (2010, Paul W.S. Anderson)-- 6.9 Resident
Evil: Retribution (2012, Paul W.S. Anderson)-- 7.3 Resident
Evil: The Final Chapter (2016, Paul W.S. Anderson) 3D — 7.2 Raise the Red Lantern (1991, Zhang Yimou)-- 7.2 Julieta (2016, Pedro Almodóvar) DP — 6.5
I suppose Krabs
does have an
evil side to him when it comes to money.
Anyway, I'm not really sure what one
does about any of this — especially given that most people think the problem is the other
side's
evil intentions, and thus feel justified in whatever norm - shattering, institution - torching nastiness their
side engages in.
I don't think anyone on either
side of this issue is totally wrong or
evil (Steve Perry is unethical and misguided but probably not
evil).
It
did sort of remind me of Jekyll and Hyde with a stronger supernatural element where everybody has a good
side and an
evil side, and what happens if those good and
evil sides could be somehow separated.
In this masterpiece, Osamu Tezuka digs up a very sinful & contorted human psyche that everyone has deep inside of themselves and presents it in such a way that you would want to look at yourself in the mirror and ask, «
Do I have this
evil side in me?»
When you said, «Both of these things actually ARE good for the customer and the anti-amazon lobby needs a better rallying cry then «paying more for books is good for you» or «amazon the
evil monopoly», it certainly sounds like you
do care, and are picking a
side.
I actually returned to Second Son over the weekend, continuing the mayhem in my
evil playthrough and just
doing side missions, lowering DUP control of the areas in the process.
The other game I wanted to play more of was the Mercenaries
side - game (it doesn't feel right to call it a mini-game) of Resident
Evil 5.
So if you're tired of being a goody - goody and don't feel like leveling a new character, you'll have the option of joining the
evil side and vise versa.
For starters, some would argue that Resident
Evil has been on a bit of a downward trend since the beloved fourth installation in the main series, with
side projects like the recently released, yet basically forgotten, Umbrella Corps
doing little to build up the series» image.
The game
does come packaged with a demo of the new Resident
Evil game, Revelations, which is a game within the main story, and not a
side game.
While Resident
Evil: The Mercenaries 3D is a good game, it is a glorified
side game, that doesn't follow a narrative.
There are optional
side quests to
do as well that can even influence how good or
evil your character is.
These interludes aren't just novel breaks that help expose Resident
Evil 7's backstory; reaching the end of these
side quests offers hints on what Ethan should
do next.
On a brighter
side though, I
do think 2017 might be the year where Resident
Evil finally stops being a joke and starts being taken seriously as a series again.
But these
side quests don't feel tacked on like they would in other games, they feel integral to the experience and
do a great job of expanding the world of
Evil Within and what's going on in more subtle and unique ways.
Capcom could have
done this with aiming in Resident
Evil: Revelations, but didn't bother so we now have the ugly Circle Pad Pro's second analogue pad welded on to the 3DS's
side as a compromise to other consoles.
They were tasked with pursuing people who have
done evil and justifying their horrific crimes, making them equal
sides of good and bad.
He's upset because you're trying to
do your job intelligently when you should just pay some middle - schoolers to read old thermometers nailed to the
sides of barns... You'd save tons of money and avoid all that
evil fraud which defines your current day!
If the opposing
side can succeed in making people think a person or group is
evil, it doesn't matter what he or she or that group says.
If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their
evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to
do something, to prevent their spouse from
doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other
side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).
Everything that one
side does is perceived as
evil, and everything the other
side does is perceived as exemplary.
I never regarded the other other
side as fools or
evil the way Insiders
do about Leave voters — which is one of the reasons they lost, as this mindset blinded them to reality beyond London.
I really don't like Halloween anymore (especially the way the occult
side of it has almost taken the place of Christmas to a lot of people, in extreme)-- it's so much more
evil - centered than the innocent time it was in the 60's when I grew up.