Sentences with phrase «did you at any time question»

Some of the recent comments posted about The City: Did you at any time question the validity of a White author speaking as a Black man?

Did you at any time question the validity of a White author speaking as a Black man?

This is the kind of feeling that I have not felt for a long time and the level and character designs are so well realised that I did at times question the sanity of the game devs when coming across the more grotesque enemies in the game.

Not exact matches

Twice in the last two weeks, I've attended convivial dinners in San Francisco jam - packed with young entrepreneurs who've asked me the same question: What can they do to help journalism at a time journalism needs so much help.

His question to them: «If I'm completely stupid in a world that is changing beyond recognition, in ways that we can not imagine at this point in time, and we do not take account of it in our decision - making, what is the likelihood that I will end up with value at risk?»

The second time I sat in their meeting, I realized that Sue asks the same questions at each meeting, and to each rep. Doing things the way we always have done them leads to forecast meetings becoming a waste of time.

Not only do they make sure that articles make sense and the subjects and verbs are right, at many places — such as the media company in question — they write the headlines and make sure the trains run on time.

«I do have questions about why he was dismissed at this time,» former presidential candidate and Sen. Marco Rubio (R - Fla.)

«The reliability question is the dirty secret of 3D printing: 3D printers don't actually work every time, and that's a big challenge to their adoption — at least the desktop ones,» Lobovsky says.

If you've been struggling with these issues, perhaps it's time for you to take a look at what you're doing, and ask the tough question.

But what I liked best about the book is how it engages with what I see as one of the most important and difficult social - policy questions of our time: How do we unstack the deck and, at the same time, get people to take ownership over improving their own lives and communities even when they reasonably believe that the deck is stacked against them?

Even if one accepts that «Statistics Canada... are ferociously - and at times irritatingly - determined to protect the privacy of those whose information is stored in their data bases», that does not address the question of who has access to the information BEFORE it reaches the StatsCan database.

A Globe investigation this summer called into question the department's ability to detect potentially dangerous contaminants, and revealed that Health Canada standards at the time did not require testing for myclobutanil and other banned chemicals.

This gives rise to the all - important question: does one's entry level into the market, i.e. the valuation of the market at the time of investing, make a significant difference to subsequent investment returns?

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

At the time, the questions were provoked by several strategic decisions on Mr. Hogan's side that didn't appear economically rational.

By this, I mean we can typically find out the answers to these questions by doing some advance research before engaging (which not only allows us to better spend our time, it also enables us to start conversations at a deeper level) or quickly after initiating a conversation.

As you look at those two columns, ask yourself this question: «During my typical day, do I spend my time and attention focusing more on the left column or the right column?»

If we're living in a low - rate world, and our only option other than holding cash is to buy the S&P at 30 times earnings, or a 30 year treasury at 2 %, or whatever other shitty deal is on offer, and you ask me what we should do, I can only answer the question by asking whether there will continue to be a ready supply of buyers at those valuations into the future.

The real question is does it take more faith to believe that mass and energy came into existence in such a way to (relatively) evenly displace it throughout the universe that came into existence at the same time, or did it come together in such a precise manner to create a supreme being that could design and build a universe after the fact?

Okay T, let me ask you a question: if at one time it was a «fact» that the world was flat... then how did it change?

And that's a good question above — I think we do wrestle with ourselves at times.

But, more importantly to our subject is another question: Why do we presuppose the Bible to always be good science, and especially at our time in history?

The judicial question is this: if the Constitution protects the religious use of wine when legislatures believe that wine is so dangerous it has to be banned, does the Constitution also protect religious use of peyote at a time when legislatures believe peyote must be banned?

So let's take each questions one at a time over the next three blog posts... When they are done, I will include links to all three at the bottom of each post.

Christian communities of all stripes have a hard time resisting the idea that, if some wonderfully sincere and orthodox Christians are in favor of something, doing that something must be at least an «open question.»

The following is the answer that + Vincent gave at a press conference, to a question about the provision of an Ordinariate «cathedral»: «I think that is something probably beyond their resources at the present time, and I don't think the Ordinariate would thank us, actually, to simply give it responsibility for a church that it would have to then maintain and upkeep.»

But he does not question (as did no one else at his time) the foundations of the logic of predication itself.

Science does not answer that question at this time and probably never will.

The sad thing is that at the time I did not even question this.

Lincoln, he believes, renewed the theory of statecraft by insisting that «ultimate moral questions did not admit of relativistic interpretations,» while knowing at the same time that the attempt to right moral wrongs may have tragic consequences and almost certainly will not achieve unqualified success.

If you have any further questions about me and / or atheism, please feel free to write me at [email protected] Despite my moniker, I don't bite — most of the time.

But this immediately raises the question of the relationship between these two uses, necessary uses, as I see it, of the word «I.» It certainly does not seem to me that I have any empirical evidence whatsoever for holding that the «I» writing these words now, at this precise 1 / 10th of a second, is in any sense a different «I» from the «I» which started writing this paper some time ago.

Jeremy since we are talking about satan casting out satan heres a question for you.Have you ever wondered why Jesus helps satan at times or at least it appears that way.Mat 8:28 - 34 Why would he do that in the case of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but is it acceptable to save one life but affect the lives of many?

While his judgment about the value of the accord for the preservation of catholic life in Europe may be seriously questioned, he did not support the agreement simply to enhance his own power, as Cornwall implies, but because he felt it was in the best interest of the church at the time.

All such questions do indeed remind us that we are dealing with a cartoon, with an attempt at emphasis that must, for the time being, leave certain other things unexplicit.

After eight years of doing this and now dealing with two teenagers living under my very own roof who ask the same question, I've got the answers down pat and can dismiss my students at the bell confident that they have at least a hazy sense that maybe going to church next Sunday wouldn't be a complete waste of their time.

Now the intellectual question which only you can answer is why do you not believe the historical account of Jesus, especially seeing the results of a huge cultural shift in the area at the time of the 1st century?

Tolstoy, in his Twenty - Three Tales, devotes the final one to describing a king who is in search of an answer to each of three questions: How can I learn to do the right thing at the right time?

I've at times had people to contact me or pull me aside and ask me questions as a result of things they've seen me do.

Frankly at the age of 47 I have better things to do with my time left than sit around posing questions about things that may or may not be.

But I know this: if I do hold on to faith at such a time it will be for the same reason that both David and Peter did: there will be a million questions, but in my heart I will know that ultimately, there is nowhere else to go.

At a time when Christians of various traditions are wrestling with questions of political theology, it does not seem to make sense for Jews to insist that Christianity holds an essentially ahistorical view of salvation.

i can say i feel that God did so and so in my life, but no one has to believe that, and if seriously questioned about it, it would only sound believable to me at the best of times.

Although a moderate theory of evolution is not objected to by the teaching Church at the present time, it does not follow that the theological question is thereby settled and that the whole matter henceforward is a purely scientific one.

So many questions, but we don't get to choose the word of the year (The runner - up is «nostalgia» which also seems just about as old as time itself, but at least it's entered sort of a boom season, so that makes a little more sense).

I live in NYC & often think of how vacuous & self absorbed this city is; but at the same time we always have an opportunity to answer the question: what would Jesus do??

Mark's Gospel manifestly appeared at a time when such a question might be asked as: «Why did we not hear of this finding of the empty tomb before?

At that point in time anyone who had questions like we do now was a person to stay away from and pray for.

I don't think I would put them to the average layperson in a small group setting, but to a pastor or deacon, a question or two at a time... for the record, I am a high school grad, have had three jobs in my entire life (church custodian, newspaper pasteup [pre-computer pagination], and grocery deli clerk), am on SSDI for complications of Marfan's Syndrome, and a Medicare beneficiary, no secondary insurance because I am about $ 20 over the income limit for Medicaid.