Direct model simulations of hurricane activity under climate change scenarios offer another perspective on the problem.
Not exact matches
This is because, although
direct effects are typically understood and easily reproducible in
models,
simulations of indirect effects are far more challenging and difficult to quantify.»
For these comparative studies I applied both simple
model calculations and massive three - dimensional
direct numerical
simulations on supercomputers.
The small - scale processes giving rise to thunderstorms make their
direct simulation in climate
models impossible given current computing power.
They hope to publicly release the new
simulation model — based on a
direct version of a kinetic Monte Carlo
simulation where reaction channels are predicted automatically on the fly as the growth process proceeds — in 2015.
The
direct microscopic
modelling of the system, by extensive computer
simulations, has confirmed the existence of this surprising regime and other predictions of the theory.
The Southampton research team, led by Richard Sandberg, Professor of Fluid Dynamics and Aeroacoustics, and including Dr Andrew Wheeler and Professor Neil Sandham, has identified that
Direct Numerical
Simulations (DNS), a
model - free approach based on first principles (no assumptions or
modelling are used) can help to develop an improved understanding of the role of turbulent phenomena in the flow - field and determine the validity of current turbulence
modelling.
«Astronomical surveys from space telescopes like Planck or Hubble observe a large segment of the visible universe while sophisticated
simulations so far could only
model very small parts of the universe, making a
direct comparison virtually impossible,» says Klaus Dolag.
Onuchic and his team integrated its
direct coupling analysis (DCA) method based on genomic databases with structure - based
models (SBM) of proteins to produce
simulations of how proteins progress through different functional states.
One possible solution, which our team has recently demonstrated for III - V photoelectrodes, is to
model speciation of interfacial reaction products by coupling ambient - pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments to
direct simulations of XPS based on
model interfaces from ab initio molecular dynamics.
The mesoscale
models are based on a continuum description rather than an atomistic description, and therefore rely on effective parameters rather than
direct simulation of chemical pathways.
(Brown and Batygin figured out that it probably exists by using mathematical
modeling and computer
simulations, not
direct observation.)
But
models are not tuned to the trends in surface temperature, and as Gavin noted before (at least for the GISS
model), the aerosol amounts are derived from
simulations using emissions data and
direct effects determined by changes in concentrations.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0628.1 In our discussion exploring the (very minor) differences in results when using different datasets we said: - «Dataset creation approaches that infill missing data areas may give overconfidence to climate changes in regions where there are no
direct measurements, when compared with
model simulations that have data in those regions.»
Direct comparison of the radiances predicted by the
model to those observed by AIRS in the thermal spectral regions dominated by water vapor absorption provides a means of assessing the
simulation of water vapor in the climate
model at the high level of detail provided by spectral measurements.
The most popular observationally - constrained method of estimating climate sensitivity involves comparing data whose relation to S is too complex to permit
direct estimation, such as temperatures over a spatio - temporal grid, with
simulations thereof by a simplified climate
model that has adjustable parameters for setting S and other key climate properties.
As computational power advances, the
direct simulation of cloud processes within climate change
models is on the horizon.
Fred, I completely disagree about the relative strength of evidence as to climate sensitivity from
simulations by AOCGMs (Chapter 8 of WG1 «Climate
Models and Their Evaluation») and from observational evidence that is either
direct or intermediated through simple Energy Balance
Models.
Judith, is the distinction Nic makes above between evidence for climate sensitivity «from
simulations by AOCGMs... and from observational evidence that is either
direct or intermediated through simple Energy Balance
Models» relevant to this «structural uncertainty»?
We constrained these five parameters with five «observations» (either
direct, or based on more complex
model simulations).
Model simulations of the Asian monsoon project that the sulphate aerosols»
direct effect reduces the magnitude of precipitation change compared with the case of only greenhouse gas increases (Emori et al., 1999; Roeckner et al., 1999; Lal and Singh, 2001).
[*] You had said: «is based purely on observational evidence, with no dependence on any climate
model simulations... to obtain a
direct measure of the overall climate response or feedback parameter... Measuring radiative flux imbalances provides a
direct measure of Y, and hence of S, unlike other ways of diagnosing climate sensitivity.»
The only
direct real - world inputs to these
models, in a climate change
simulation context, are changes in atmospheric chemistry and composition (such as increasing greenhouse gases, or changing volcanic aerosols) and changes in solar radiation.
Koch, D., D. Jacob, I. Tegen, D. Rind, and M. Chin, 1999: Tropospheric sulfur
simulation and sulfate
direct radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation
model.
The
direct radiative forcing for sulphate aerosol derived from
models published since the TAR and from the AeroCom
simulations where different
models used identical emissions.
The
simulations performed with and without the
direct sulphate effect (GS and G, respectively) with the same
model are more similar to each other than to the other
models, indicating that the individual response characteristics of the various
models are dominating the response pattern rather than differences in the forcing.
Using sophisticated antenna
simulation software, analyzers and test equipment usually reserved for military applications; Antennas
Direct is creating antenna designs that are 2 - 10 times more powerful than the
models currently sold in big box retail outlets.