Displacing coal emissions with gas emissions is beneficial from a climate standpoint.
Not exact matches
«With increasing shale gas fracking and many countries» interest in
displacing coal generation with natural gas due to the lower greenhouse gas
emissions, natural gas use seems well poised to grow,» the report states.
For instance, falling US
emissions are being driven mostly by cheap natural gas
displacing coal — something that may happen elsewhere.
In
coal - dependent regions that have the highest CO2
emissions, existing wind and gas technology work very well together to
displace lots of
emissions.
States could allow generation from new, not - under - construction plants to
displace generation (and
emissions) from existing
coal or natural gas plants that were accounted for in the
emission rate computation.
These additional supplies have helped
displace a significant amount of
coal for power generation, leading to a reduction in U.S. energy - related greenhouse gas
emissions to levels last seen in the 1990s.
Its use as fuel in an electrical power plant is most attractive since it can
displace the use of
coal and provide cost effective B.T.U.'s while reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
The commitments to increase renewables and reduce
emissions in the EU leave little room for gas growth, with cheaper renewables continuing to
displace coal.
A new solar plant avoids fewer
emissions per MW of capacity than any other kind of new plant
displacing an old
coal plant.
However, most of the
coal facilities have retired and residual oil
emissions are about as low as they can go so future reductions will have to
displace more economic natural gas.
The climate benefit is twofold: prevent landfill
emissions and
displace coal, oil, or natural gas that might otherwise be used.
«Natural gas
displaces coal and to a lesser extent oil, driving down
emissions, but it also
displaces some nuclear power, pushing up
emissions.
The main reason that effectiveness is less than 100 % is that wind generation
displaces the lower rather than the higher
emissions intensity generators; e.g. wind
displaces gas in preference to
coal.
«The drop in CO2
emissions is largely the result of low natural gas prices, which have contributed to natural gas
displacing a large amount of
coal used for electricity generation.»
While the start of the Great Recession had something to do with it, new analysis from the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences shows that, when it comes to reductions in
emissions from electricity production, which dropped 8.76 % from 2008, cheaper natural gas prices were behind the decline, with natural gas
displacing coal.
It is staying ahead mostly by building hydro, and in the tropics that releases a lot of methane (and
displaces people and destroys habitats), in some cases so much that it's «dirtier» than
coal, so being renewable isn't much of a plus if you're worried about GHG
emissions.