Disputes over employee status are common in Canada and the US.
In another case involving
a dispute over employees» vacation entitlement, the Supreme Court of Canada has once again ruled in favour of the arbitrator.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor
disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled
employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our
employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The tension mirrors
disputes that have arisen
over the refusal by Catholic hospitals and universities to offer contraception in their
employee health plans and moves by local governments to stop contracting with religiously affiliated adoption agencies that refuse to place children in households headed by same - sex couples.
Yelp, or any other employer dealing with public
disputes, should send an email or memo to
employees, explaining that it will not respond to human resources requests that have been broadcast
over social media, suggests Segal.
But there is a
dispute over whether the protection covers only
employees of publicly traded companies or also applies to contractors hired by the companies.
In an ongoing
dispute over electricity rate changes proposed by the crown corporation last November, the Canadian Office and Professional
Employees Union, Local 378, says that BC Hydro is using an accounting slight - of - hand to mask the real financial toll of unrealistically low electricity prices.
Lawmakers say they're having serious negotiations to iron out a
dispute over which
employees could face a pension penalty.
[Box 28] 1101 Vermont Ave., lease information, 1981 Real estate, 1101 Vermont Ave., subleasing, Julien Studley, 1984 - 1985 Real estate, 1101 Vermont Ave., subleasing, 1985 - 1986 Real estate, Spaulding reports on Washington office space market, 1982, 1988 Space Planning Committee, input for new building, 1980 - 1982 Real estate 1776 Mass Ave., lease information, 1980 - 1985 GWU lease to 14th and H Associates, 1980 1333 H Street Developer's brochure, 1982 Coldwell Banker, 1984 JTR notes on parking, etc., 1984
dispute over building size, 1984 lease between AAAS and NY Life, 1984 - 1985 final draft of lease, 1984 first lease amendment, 1985 second lease amendment, 1987 financial impact of move, 1985 misc., 1985 space concerns, 1984 Design Business Interiors (DBI) Move Committee meeting minutes, 1984 - 1985 ORS Associates, relocation plan, 1984 relocation, budget, 1984 relocation,
employee info on moving records, 1985 relocation, misc., 1985 1515 Mass Ave. appraisal reports, 1977 & 1981 Dupont Circle historic district, 1983 potential sale, misc., 1984 interested buyers, 1981 - 1983 potential sale, broker proposals, 1984 sale to Tunisian Embassy, 1984
The Chicago school board has agreed to hire hundreds of additional teachers and other
employees in order to end a four - year
dispute with the U.S. Education Department
over the quality of the school system's services for handicapped pupils.
Taking a new tack toward resolving Michigan's long - running
dispute over school - finance equity, Gov. John M. Engler has announced a plan to help close the gap between rich and poor districts by making better - off systems bear more of the burden of school -
employee retirement costs.
The
dispute boiled
over in the fall of 2011, when about 50
employees gathered in the firm's largest conference room after an annual meeting with investors.
Courts typically come down on the side of
employees in
disputes over non-compete agreements, particularly if the agreement is not found to be reasonable — it subjects the
employee to undue hardship or it exceeds the nature of protection an employer would justifiably be entitled to.
After a
dispute with hotel management
over medical care and salaries, three disgruntled
employees set a fire in the Hotel Dupont Plaza in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on December 31, 1986.
Successfully appealed NLRB hearing officer's decision in an election
dispute over a determinative challenged ballot, winning a unanimous ruling from Chairman Liebman and Members Becker and Pearce, and clarifying law on voter eligibility of regular part - time
employees (355 NLRB No. 181)
As a trusted Paris law firm, Vatier's highly skilled labor and employment lawyers assist clients with employment contracts, management of individual employment relations, individual and collective dismissal procedures, restructuring plans, employment litigation before the Conseil des Prud» hommes, regulation of the workplace,
employee representation, agreements as to work hours, management packages, company charters, profit sharing plans, social contributions, work - related accidents, URSSAF audits, collective employment relations,
disputes with trade unions, and in litigation
over elections for
employee representatives.
Disputes between an
employee and employer may arise
over past verbally - agreed - upon terms, established unwritten practices, and more.
Disputes often arise between employers and
employees over issues such as overtime, holiday pay, and work responsibilities.
The Kentucky Supreme Court recently handed down a far - reaching decision that allows
employees in Kentucky the option to certify class - action lawsuits against employers
over unpaid wages and overtime
disputes.
The decision reviews statutory interpretation conducted by the FOIP Commissioner acting under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000 c F - 25 (FOIP Act) to settle a
dispute between Alberta Treasury Branches (ATB) and the Alberta Union of Provincial
Employees (AUPE)
over the obligation of ATB to disclose certain bargaining unit information to AUPE.
We particularly have experience representing employers who have
disputes with their
employees over a variety of issues, and we often act on behalf of
employees and employers involved in Human Rights
disputes.
The High Court heard a record 167
disputes over confidential business information «theft» last year, the majority being civil claims brought by businesses against former
employees.
Some areas of
dispute include
employee medical information, the extent to which employers may monitor
employees» use of the internet or personal e-mail accounts at the workplace, and the appropriate degree of surveillance
over employees at the workplace.
We have had a number of telephone calls
over the years from disgruntled unionized
employees who seek to take their employer to court
over a variety of workplace
disputes.
[2] Thus unionized
employees can not institute class actions against their employers for
disputes over the terms of their collective agreements.
Some of the most common are wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, violations of the Family Medical Leave Act, violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Violations of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law
disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days upon resignation or termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately upon leaving when the
employee gives fair notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly
employee as an exempt
employee, misclassification of an hourly
employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and
over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse
employees for expenses.
I have helped take companies from an idea
over a beer to flourishing businesses by establishing new companies, creating contracts systems, working with vendors, talent, and
employees, resolving
disputes and handling negotiations, and protecting intellectual property rights.
If your business is facing a
dispute from a current or former
employee over alleged violation of benefit plans, or your business has been served with a lawsuit alleging discrimination or retaliation, our business litigators can help in - house counsel quickly and efficiently resolve these
disputes.
In a career spanning
over 36 years, Mr. Ramos has achieved
over $ 5 billion in monetary recoveries for his clients, obtained injunctive relief in numerous matters, and successfully defended hundreds of clients in defeating claims asserted, on an individual or class basis in court and regulatory proceedings and arbitrations, in IP, antitrust, securities, products liability, environmental, executive compensation,
employee benefits, contract, warranty, insurance, corporate control, merger, hostile takeover, real estate, landlord - tenant, oil and gas, auction, tax, and theatrical and art law
disputes.
Our solicitors help many
employees secure flexible working conditions, by advising them of their rights or by intervening on their behalf to settle a
dispute with their employer
over flexible working requests.
Over one year ago, Canada Post and its largest union, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW), were involved in a disruptive labour
dispute that put
employees out of work, disrupted the flow of mail and lost Canada Post money (brief background here).
The
dispute is
over whether Cooper violated the National Labor Relations Act by firing an
employee who yelled racist comments at a temporary worker who crossed the union's picket line during a lockout.