Not exact matches
When
God handed the Promised Land to the children
of Israel, most affected tribes fought the
divine eviction.
At most,
god does exist because we find active evidence proving there was some sort
of divine hand in the origin
of life, which then leads us on the hunt for more evidence
of that same
gods existance throughout the fossil record and most likely will lead us to prove that the
god of abraham is STILL man - made, but there is some other supernatural power out there.
Unless
God himself came down and wrote those words with his own divine hands, those are words of men who believe to have been influenced by g
God himself came down and wrote those words with his own
divine hands, those are words
of men who believe to have been influenced by
godgod.
There can be no doubt that
God makes decisions a propos
of the disjunctive multiplicity
of eternal objects; the difficulty is to establish in precisely what sense these
divine decisions are distinguishable from the choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to be this: on the one
hand, the principle
of classification is to be challenged by positing the primordiality
of a world
of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in logical terms»; on the other
hand, positing pure potentiality as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all logical order would seem to be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»
Glorious Lord Christ: the
divine influence secretly diffused and active in the depths
of matter, and the dazzling centre where all the innumerable fibres
of the manifold meet; power as implacable as the world and as warm as life; you whose forehead is
of the whiteness
of snow, whose eyes are
of fire, and whose feet are brighter than molten gold; you whose
hands imprison the stars; you who are the first and the last, the living and the dead and the risen again; you who gather into your exuberant unity every beauty, every affinity, every energy, every mode
of existence; it is you to whom my being cried out with a desire as vast as the universe, «In truth you are my Lord and my
God.»
The new life in Christ, the consequent transformation
of all their hopes and expectations, the sense
of fresh power to achieve the hitherto impossible, the vital awareness
of the change which had been effected in their relations with
God, the confidence
of sin forgiven and
of restoration to
divine favor, the «joy in the holy Spirit,» and confident looking forward to great events still to come, and soon, as the result
of Christ's exaltation at
God's right
hand and
of his promised coming as Redeemer and Judge — all this lies behind the choice and the use
of technical terms or concepts borrowed, first
of all, from current Jewish messianism.
On the other
hand, there is no
God of a religious tradition cut off from critical reflection so that «it is wrong for religion's advocate to confound the object
of this affirmation with the modalities
of the affirmation; it is wrong for him to believe that the transcendence
of the
divine mystery is extended to the materiality
of the expressions that it takes on in human consciousness; with greater reason it is wrong for him to consider that his problematic is canonized by this transcendence.
Many liberal Christians, on the other
hand, are essentially deists; it is their view that after having created the world and revealed the
divine will in its structure and the laws
of nature,
God can not be looked to for further intervention.
On the other
hand, without the dramatic and poetic expression
of the reversal in
God's love play, when Krishna is conquered by Radha and the
divine bows to the human, the full reality that the devotee experiences would not be expressed.
Perhaps the best way
of thinking about this is to distinguish between the loving unity that the three
divine Persons experience, on the one
hand, and the loving unity that defines
God's eternal essence, on the other.
He was
of «the nature
of God;» He shared «the throne
of God;» He was «at
God's right
hand;» He was «
God's Son;» He was the
divine «Logos.»
On the other
hand, finding a unitary principle for the manifold
of discreet entities, which includes human experience, is made problematic by a denial
of divine relativity because the relative nature
of God did at least that unify the world into an ordered and organic whole.
The tension that Israel knew throughout her life as a nation between faith in an electing, acting, covenanting
God on the one
hand, and on the other the rational improbability, if not absurdity,
of the
divine promises implicit in her faith; the conflict between the
divine demand to trust and the human doubt; the incongruity between
divine promise for the nation and the incredible historical odds against fulfillment — all
of this Israel is mindful
of in the shaping
of the stories, and in the reading and cherishing
of the stories.
The myths
of Genesis tell us, as no objective history
of public events could, what the community
of Israel essentially believed about
God's relationship to the world and to man; and the legends
of the Fathers record Israel's understanding
of herself, her own relationship to
God and the world, her own sense
of sin and inadequacy in tension with her conviction
of special
divine Election, her fears on the one
hand and her highest hopes on the other.
As the «outpouring»
of the Spirit had come, unsought, in consequence
of the life, death and resurrection
of Christ, so the «indwelling»
of the Spirit was the means by which He continued to form, guide and govern His Church out
of the unseen world, where He was now invested with
divine authority «at the right
hand of God».
God is still that supreme reality who on the one
hand maintains order and provides novelty and on the other
hand through the process
of nature and history secures ends that are incorporated into the
divine self (in the
divine «consequent nature,» as process thinkers would say), and thus validates and vindicates what is done in the world.
On the other
hand, man too is active, but his activity is also in love; he responds freely to the love which is given him and in that response he knows that he is truly «being himself», for he was intended by his creation to be a responding lover and in no sense a marionette pulled by strings manipulated by
God — certainly not the victim
of the
divine coercion.
Though Jesus had not, it is true, announced himself to Israel as the Messiah, and had forbidden the demons to make him known — since they knew him» — and had even commanded his disciples to be silent about their recognition
of his Messiahship, nevertheless, at the last, in the high priest's court, he had admitted unequivocally that he was the one who should sit at the right
hand of the
divine Power (
God) and come with the clouds
of heaven.
God does not surrender the
divine into the
hands of.
These suggest a vision which revealed Jesus in his heavenly glory at the right
hand of the
divine throne, not unlike that seen by the martyr Stephen when he looked up to heaven and «saw the glory
of God, and Jesus standing at
God's right
hand».47 So Goguel comments, «When we consider the part played by the faith in the resurrection in Paul's religious life and thought as a result
of Christ's appearance to him, we see that most essential to his faith was not the feeling that Jesus had returned to the environment
of his life on earth preceding his passion but a belief in his glorification, i.e. in his transition to life in heaven where death has no more dominion over him.»
As a young man I took
God's existence for granted, seeing the
divine hand in the grandeur
of the stars and the beauty
of the flowers.
unless you subscribe to Miller's brand
of the Christian faith... then he was only
God's
hand doling out
divine justice against those that killed Jesus (even though that was a huge part
of the Plan from the get go).
For Mark, Jesus
of Nazareth became Son
of God at his baptism, through the endowment
of the
divine Spirit; for Paul, on the other
hand, the Son
of God was a
divine being who existed with
God before the creation
of the world, who became the intermediary cause or agent in the creation and remained the sustaining principle
of the universe.
On the other
hand, the enormity
of suffering by creatures on this earth, and perhaps especially the human suffering
of the present century, makes it difficult for us to return to any concept
of divine omnipotence in which
God stands silently and apathetically beyond the world's evolutionary and historical struggles, able but unwilling to intervene.
As the «one relational complex in which all potential objectifications find their niche,» (Process 66) for Whitehead the extensive continuum certainly corresponds to the breadth
of vision
of the
divine primordial nature, even as the space - time continuum as a partial realization
of the extensive continuum corresponds to the more limited character
of the
divine consequent nature here and now Thus, even though Whitehead does not make explicit use
of field - oriented imagery to describe the
God - world relationship, the concepts are at
hand to sustain that line
of thought.8
Jesus is the eschatological Teacher, who upon the foundation
of the sacred Jewish Law but with special commandments (relating to poverty and obedience) and with
divine power leads his followers to the gates
of the Kingdom
of God; he is now exalted at the right
hand of God, and is soon to come on the clouds
of heaven» as the judge
of all mankind.
On the other
hand, they complain against what Luther called «the left
hand of God»: the
divine bungling that blotches an otherwise splendid creation.
In chiding the historical critics and the subjectivists
of his own day (e.g., D. F. Strauss on the one
hand and Schleiermacher, his colleague at the University
of Berlin, on the other), Hegel assumed responsibility for proving the existence
of God and justifying
divine providence.
On the other
hand, the World is a creation
of gods or supernatural beings; to unfold a structure
of the World is equivalent to revealing a secret or a «ciphered» signification
of divine workmanship.
Diego Maradona decided that only that
divine name could sully his otherwise glorious performance against England in the 1986 World Cup, the ever infamous «
Hand of God».
«It represents a kind
of apocalyptic
divine intervention upon Thomas Jefferson's vision
of a pastoral, agrarian America built on the rationality
of the grid,» Light says, «as if the
hand of God was a very displeased claw.»
Apart from this, such conversations are often countered with views about faith in the
divine, such that risks associated with life are often left in the
hands of God.