Sentences with phrase «do less law»

Peter: [24:28] Yeah, because when I think of your Do Less Law, and I think about what you were talking about earlier, in terms of sitting down and doing some of the hard work of mapping out what the options are.

Ron: [18:00] I wanted something that had not been used, and I wanted something provocative, and so, «Do Less Law» encapsulates a couple of ideas.

Ron: [26:36] On Do Less Law, I don't have a good metric, and on who's doing the best in efficiency, I have too many clients that are doing too many interesting things where whoever, whatever, it's not fair to start naming some names.

[35:32] We talked a little bit about, just to stay on the «do less law,» who would be driving it, so who do you see in terms of driving that movement, because one of the things that went through my head is people in Ron's position, so people who have, perhaps, left the practice of law or are becoming frustrated with it, and then they see this as a banner they can fly under.

In my prior post, GCs Now Do Less Law, I reported on the Altman Weil survey of Chief Legal Officers.

[18:35] Another element of Do Less Law is a lot of lawyers and this is true for in ‑ house lawyers, as well as law firm lawyers learned in law school and grew up professionally with this idea of «leave no stone unturned,» sometimes leave no mote of dust unturned.

This is the type of ROI available when lawyers use people, process, and technology to «do less law.»

See Ron Friedmann, Do Less Law — A Taxonomy of Ideas, June 11, 2015.

These articles below explore ways to do less law.

I have the good fortune to be invited to attend the upcoming ILTA annual conference to join my friend Ron Friedmann in conducting an interactive workshop entitled «Do Less Law.»

This session builds on a growing concept that the maturation of law practice is as much about doing less as it is about doing more with less, a concept that Ron coined in a November 2011 article «To Reduce Legal Spend, Do Less Law» and that he has since expanded on his blog and #DoLessLaw tweets.

What exactly does it mean, however, to do less law?

Below is the taxonomy of Do Less Law options.

That's the conclusion of one group of attendees at an ILTACON session titled «Do Less Law: A Contrarian View of the Future» (#ILTA124).

So Jeff Carr and the notion of both next law and what he calls do less law.

I have long believed that the real path to client value lies in doing less law, not just practicing more efficiently.

I don't know if I see law firms being the ones driving the idea of doing less law.

Natalie: [17:39] That kind of ties nicely into your idea of doing less law.

Not exact matches

«To the extent that the program does that, discretion and case law and interpretation become much less of a factor.»

These come in the forms of patents, trademarks, and copyrights, but trademark and copyright laws are less favorable for small businesses, so they don't hold as much weight as a patent does.

«Expanding the focus of law enforcement beyond people who are real threats would make all Americans less safe by diverting resources, while millions of undocumented folks who don't pose a threat will live in fear of deportation.»

Same thing IMHO with Google's unofficial «Do No Evil» motto — a perfect example of the law of inverse relevance: the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about iDo No Evil» motto — a perfect example of the law of inverse relevance: the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about ido about something, the more you have to keep talking about it.

Two thirds of Canadians do not agree with the current law where employers are allowed to pay temporary foreign workers less for equivalents skills and duties (66 %), and just more than a quarter agree (28 %).

«If you anticipate the kind of huge appreciation in your personal wealth that could come from an IPO or a company sale, the best thing you can do is transfer stock to your heirs before the sale, because it will be worth much less then, and that minimizes the tax liability,» explains Allan Landau, a partner with Boston law firm Sherburne, Powers & Needham.

Moreover, Republicans may find that it is much easier to criticize and produce legislation to repeal a less than perfect bill when they know it is ultimately not going to be signed into law, than actually producing a new law that will accomplish all that Obamacare did plus address its imperfections.

«Plaintiffs» brief illustrates the views of those who may never have even laid eyes on the weapons they vilify,» the group wrote, «much less squeezed off a few rounds at the range, like millions of peaceful, law - abiding Americans regularly do.»

If however most of these tokens are investment contracts in the end, we know that due to the impact of the securities laws that registration is more or less the only thing we can do in order to operate a company coin within the bounds of US law.

And in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may think of themselves less as originalists (in one recent case in particular Scalia and Thomas dissented from the majority which held that convicted child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their sentences based on subtle shifts of language and the over-application of prior case law — no one wants a child molester free and about, but such results focused outcomes are always dangerous).

I could care less if someone worshiped a shoe in a jar as long as they have the sense to keep their beliefs out of the law and when viewing how the law will apply to the US Citizens that they do not only look at it from their perspective as there are many out there that have dissimilar beliefs and do not always view the world from the same perspective.

Therefore, to break God's law is to do evil, to a lesser or greater extent, and because you will return to and enjoy breaking God's law, humanity is evil.

But the law made 18 years ago didn't account for the advancement of technology and reach of YouTube — rendering it much less powerful.

Not only does it not matter in the least to federal law — it meatters even less to those who don't want or need it to say anything.

One does not have to abhor homosexuality in order to understand that the recent change in law has opened a wide door that will leave the school system, and children in general, vulnerable to further legal changes that will always go towards greater licentiousness, and less protection for the vulnerable.

How do you respect people that * believe * you don't deserve equality under the law like everyone else, because they think you are less than, or a sinner, etc...

Curtis Berger shocked his Columbia University Law School associates at a convocation for the opening of the school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive to the needs of others,... even less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.&raqLaw School associates at a convocation for the opening of the school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive to the needs of others,... even less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.&raqlaw school.»

Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower, Mary Ann Mason reports that while women in so - called «fast - track professions» have fewer children than does the average American woman, female faculty are almost half as likely as female physicians and slightly less likely than female lawyers to have a child at all, even though academia offers far more flexible hours than the average law firm or hospital.

About myself, I know that I don't live up to my own standards, even less to those of others, or the moral law.

correct me if I am wrong but does nt this law that is quite flawless state judge not less thou be judged by that very same standard?

Yet it did not seem to rule out calling such use a «lesser evil» - a matter of on - going discussion amongst Natural Law theorists.

Athiests are not less likely to have lower morales, I have high morales and I don't believe in god but what I do believe in is civil society and the law, both make me live in civalization and prevent me from doing crimes that would get me in trouble and possibly hurt other people.

We do not deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we deny or circumscribe His power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to God.»

Making matters worse is that although natural law is widely (and somewhat misleadingly) considered a Christian doctrine, Christians often find it no less mysterious than others do.

No lesser a Christian than Martin Luther understood our predicament: Anyone, he wrote in ìOn Temporal Authority, î who tried ìto rule the world by the gospel and to abolish all temporal law and the sword on the plea that all are baptized and Christian, and that, according to the gospel, there shall be among them no law or sword» or the need for either»... would be loosing the ropes and chains of the savage wild beasts and letting them bite and mangle everyone, meanwhile insisting that they were harmless, tame, and gentle creatures; but I would have the proof in my wounds.î I do not believe that Hauerwas sees America's enemies as harmless, tame, and gentle creatures.

You do realize that Silverman and AA was told for years by christians that they should be killed in the streets and suffer eternally and at best, be considered as less - than - animals by the US governement and its laws?

Jesus has wholly separated obedience from legalism; hence he does not set up a better law in opposition to a less good law; he opposes the view that the fulfillment of the law is the fulfilling of the will of God.

Technically, the Pope didn't directly «remove» Finn, as the media has widely reported; rather, the bishop formally offered his resignation in accordance with canon 401, paragraph 2, of the Code of Canon Law, which reads: «A diocesan bishop who has become less able to fulfill his office because of ill health or some other grave cause is earnestly requested to present his resignation from office.»

Maybe he is saying that those who truly believe abortion is wrong should do less to make themselves feel good (pushing for anti-abortion laws that just drive abortion underground) and more to actually decrease abortion (push to make birth control more available and to improve the economic situation of the poor).

According to Jim Peebles of Princeton University, Lemaitre's framework for cosmology is still relevant today because it «consider [s] scenarios for the evolution of structure that start at high redshift with initial conditions that do not seem unduly conjured, evolve accordingto accepted laws of physics, and end up looking more or less like the universe we observe.»

Telegram correspondent Matt Law doesn't seem to regard the Spaniard as highly as Newcastle fans and voiced his less than kind opinions about the relationship between the fans and the former Real Madrid manager on Twitter during the game.

The law does vary if your state also has maternity laws, if your company has less than 50 employees or how long you have been with the company can also affect FMLA time.