Sentences with phrase «do jihad»

Is it maybe - that the American Atheist organization is scared to put a sign up like that because if they do a jihad will be placed on their heads and headquarters??

Second, Muslims also do Jihad against themselves.

No Agnostic has EVER done Jihad!!!

Not exact matches

September 2016 (5310 kb PDF file): The September 2016 issue of the IMF Research Bulletin includes the following two Research Summaries: «A New Look at Bank Capital» (by Jihad Dagher, Giovanni Dell» Ariccia, Luc Laeven, Lev Ratnovski, and Hui Tong) and «Does Growth Create Jobs?

You sure the hell don't see them holding an annual Jihad Crusade at Anaheim Stadium.

The second category he calls «circumstantial evidence ``, which, if he was shown any of these, might cause him to rethink his position even if he doesn't convert: a genuinely flawless and consistent holy book; a religion without internal disputes or factions; a religion who's followers have never committed or taken part in atrocities; a religion that had a consistent record of winning its jihads and holy wars.

These are men greeds and are unrelated to religion nor it is in favor of religions... religion is a direct spritual connection between the Servent and his GOD... that was what most of us knew before we were spoiled by the «Islamic Belt Idea» that the West had introduced and marketed it in our MidEast area towards encouraging youth to join militants in «Jihad» establishing that belt surrounding and fighting the communists in Afghanistan and some Asian countries... Well now that has spoiled our life coming back on us and you but I do not see why should we innocents pay for your «Political Games»...!?

We don't call it Jihad, but we do call it a «Just War,» a war with a righteous cause, a war in which God fights on our side.

and there is nothing wrong with the name jihad since jihad actually means «fighting for your country and people» without waiting for anything in return, for the love of god there are NO 72 virgins!!!!!! freedom of speech does not mean insulting other people!

If Jihad is a struggle to worship God, when did Americans ever stop Osama Bin Laden and his buddies from worshipping God in the their caves, half way across the world, when they decided to send planes through the twin towers on 9/11?

How would any country in the mid east react if I and 30 Christians hoped in planes and took out 3000 people... (I am not Christian and would likely not ride in a plane with that many neurotic people, but for arguments sake... personally I think religion is the fastest road to hell, but that's another debate)... the answer is simple... Jihad... how do I make such a simple 1 word answer... Ayatollah in Iran... he has a Jihad panic button... Osama Bin Laden... he has one too... that dude in Iran that no one knows or cares how to pronounce... has 2... one for the world and one for Israel... and pretty much anyone with keys to a mosque.

I don't see Christians calling for violent jihad against a political group or another religion.

Many of them although may not participate in physically waging jihad, support charities and organizations that do, and sympathize with their Imam's that preach hatred and violence of the west and non-muslims.

Look up Jihad Watch and see what they are doing in Iraq now to the Christians.

Look at what your new faith believes to do to people that don't believe in Islam on Jihad Watch.

Historically, the «greater» jihad refers to the struggle each person has with himself or herself to do what is right.

The only widely accepted prohibition during the first Jihad was to not murder the «people of the book», that would be Jews and Christians, but all of the people of the book would have to under Muslim rule and could not do anything against Islam.

I want to go make Jihad, everyone does, but we can't just go there, the borders are militarized.».

Your arguments try to nullify all the good work done by the Ahmadi Prophet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to take the violent jihad out of Islam like a malignant cancer and transform it from a primitive, violent version into a modern and respectable religion.

So yes, Jihad does allow killing civilians.

That being said, I also believe that jihad and violence do not have any place in a religious belief — PERIOD.

well — if amhadis do not believe in jihad — than how did this prophet propose to reform muslims who do believe in jihad (and / or violent jihad).

if not — then they win — for you too employ violent jihad to enact a change to non-violence (you do if you expect the USA to come to your rescue — because that is what would happen in USA — police / military / and / or militia would solve the probelm — with violence).

i simply want to know how the «newer» muslim phrophet (don't even know his name) taught his followers how to change the concept of violence as a means for jihad and / or self - defense into something that isn't violent (if that is what he did — i do not know except for this conversation).

You said you don't see the what's wrong with the Jihad comment?

Do not think like a Muslim and take the word jihad into thinking that you have to blow everybody up.

please don't call me racist but for the record, I am a Pakistani Sunni muslim and support Jihad against Hindus, Jews, Christians, Gays, Lesbians, and dogs.

Not only do they know that the verses of Jihad are more numerous and authoritative (abrogating any earlier verses of «peace»), they also hold their entire quran to be the eternal and literal word of Allah... and this is what often makes these animals so freakin» dangerous.

can you imagine if the bible did have a doctrine of Jihad?

103:3 — Except those who believe and do righteous good deeds, and recommend one another to the truth (i.e. order one another to perform all kinds of good deeds (Al - Ma «ruf) which Allah has ordained, and abstain from all kinds of sins and evil deeds (Al - Munkar) which Allah has forbidden), and recommend one another to patience (for the sufferings, harms, and injuries which one may encounter in Allah's Cause during preaching His religion of Islamic Monotheism or Jihad, etc.).

There are always pessimistic and optimistic views over Islam but my religion teaches peace and humanity and jihad is to resist against wrong no matter if some one have same faith, it can be through writing also and please if u haven't read my religion, (which I can see) then please DO N'T comment.

If jihad is to resist wrong no matter what faith, why then I wonder is it that we don't see much of active resistance from moderate muslims to terrorism?

Watch the movie The Third Jihad and HEAR them say what they are going to do.

or a war aginst invaders... if smeone enters ur home and starts taking over it u'll try and get them out by any means possible... Jihad is a war fought if ur country is invaded by outside forces... which is a right for any human being... one again before passing judgement yuou might want to get ur facts straight... don't listen to what u're told... God has given u a brain... use it... study a religion..

read it first... no where does it give credece to terror... Jihad means An individual's striving for spiritual self - perfection.

You are kowtowing weaklings who don't seem to realize there is a World - wide Jihad going on, and no amount of your CRAVEN appeasement will end it.

I'm not muslim and I don't know much about it, but I read somewhere that «jihad» was supposed to mean an internal war..

What OBL did for this years is wrong, jihad has many ways it's not always killing people.

I don't want anyone in my neighborhood who thinks jihad means kill Americans.

Despite the loss of a decent tackle in Austin Teitsma, it does seem that Phair will have pieces up front: JUCO transfer Jihad Ward was a success at end, and Dawuane Smoot proved decent in handling the hybrid roles of the LEO position.

An important part of al - Qaeda's persistent appeal lies in what it does when it is not busy waging violent jihad or churning out position statements and theological treatises.

For letting the forces of jihad flourish under its watchful eyes, as did many others in the region and afar.

Commingled loyalties (a new counter-terrorism term for people who are influenced by both ISIS and another extremist group) are possible, but ISIS doesn't offer all that much to a radicalized Palestinian that Hamas, Islamic Jihad or Hezbollah would.

Yes they would probably love to launch a terrorist attack against Israel; but they are far less likely to do so than Palestinian Authority or Hamas or Hezbollah or Islamic Jihad.

It's more of a buddy comedy than a deep satirical look at modern day terrorism but it does carry a decent, well researched social commentary on extremism and Jihad in a British context.

That anxiety does not arise from theoretical / fictional personas, but rather from 9/11, Jihad fundamentalism, Homeland Security, and the war in Iraq.

You repeat this on and on indefinitely and the coffee - cream mixture is always 97 % coffee and 3 % cream, so no, the human portion does not accumulate in the atmosphere like the climate alarmists claim so they can peddle their anti-humanity holy jihad against CO2.

Hope it doesn't explode and take on the elements of a «religious» crusade or jihad; which is quite possible.

Did someone declare an Ecoterror Jihad?

If NOAA had done a professional job documenting their surface sites and making this information available, there would be no need for this: 1) «assault» - Real Climate 2) «jihad» - Eli Rabett 3) «harassment» (real or theoretical; don't matter)- BigCityLib So who's paranoid??