3)
Does Supernaturalism currently have «reasonably certain» explanation for the beginning MET?
Assuming you answer would be «yes» for 1 and 2, what is your answer for: «3)
Does Supernaturalism currently have «reasonably certain» explanation for the beginning MET?
Not exact matches
Thus Martin concludes, for example, that N. T. Wright's approach to Jesus, which mixes
supernaturalism and ordinary biography, is just as historically valid as Sanders's method, which
does not deal with miracles or the resurrection — although, paradoxically Martin finds Wright's arguments about the resurrection very unconvincing.
(While it may have been the best possible at the time, given the assumptions and available categories, it denies the full humanity of Jesus,
does not provide a basis for understanding God's ideal relation to us, and entails all the problems of
supernaturalism, among other problems.)
The solution offered may seem nothing but a pietistic leap into
supernaturalism: «There shall be no poor with thee... if only thou diligently hearken to the voice of the Lord thy God to observe to
do all this commandment which I command thee this day» (Deut.
If, whenever personal will steps in to
do something that nature by itself would not
do, we call that supernatural, we obviously can not get
supernaturalism out of religion, because we can not get it out of life.
Although many «conservative» Christians seem to be committed to the mechanistic view of nature with the accompanying «
supernaturalism» which separates God from the world, what they are conserving has little to
do with the Bible.
They were nonpolitical, not in the sense of segregation from political life and interests, as the signs of a purely «spiritual» change in the world, say in human hearts, but in the sense of total
supernaturalism: the whole present world order, with its politics and its oppression, its hunger and its hatred, was to be completely
done away.
Volker Doormann says: Legatus says:
Do scientists also believe in
supernaturalism?
Do scientists also believe in
supernaturalism?
Legatus says: January 8, 2013 at 6:25 am
Do scientists also believe in
supernaturalism?
When a one has naturally achieved, by one's natural capacity of reason, a metaphysical / epistemological system that has determined that to live a life of reason then one by necessity must exclusively exercise one's natural free volition to exclusively use man's natural capacity for reason exclusively on the natural world then one
does not even reject religion's
supernaturalism / superstitionism... one then has achieved the capability to say religion's
supernaturalism and superstitionism is irrelevant to their metaphysical / epistemological system.
One may say that the terms of time or space used in physics is not physics, but that
does not mean that physicians or scientists believe in
supernaturalism.