Dan Goldhaber, «Everyone's Doing It, But What
Does Teacher Testing Tell Us about Teacher Effectiveness?»
Not exact matches
Did a
teacher ever tell you to make sure you were active in the afternoon to help you ace your next
test?
One example that I read about, Stanford University, a
teacher in artificial intelligence offered a class, a couple of hundred kids in the class, he offered it online to 30,000 people, or 20,000 people, and if I remember correctly when he gave the
test there were 400 people, or something like that, that
did better than the number one kid at Stanford.
This was the place where I heard the well - worn phrase, «The
teacher doesn't talk while you're writing the
test.»
It would be like having your science
teacher explain in detail what we have discovered in regards to evolution and been able to
test and repeat but then ends with «Even though this is what we have observed time and again and has been peer reviewed and see no reason it should work in any other way, we just don't know how science worked 10,000 years ago.
Don't forget about that spelling
test on Tuesday — your tenth - grade English
teacher will be expecting you to know how to spell all KINDS of words, like «intelligence»!
«I ask our coaches to go in and visit with classroom
teachers about the youngster's presence in the classroom — not just how he
does on
test scores, but his presence.
And yet those
teachers, according to Jackson's calculations, were
doing more to get those students to college and raise their future wages than were the much celebrated
teachers who boosted students»
test scores.
I
do remind folks that NCLB had its origins in legislation passed in Texas during the 1980s (under then - Gov Mark White) where, in exchange for
teacher raises / bonuses, standardized
tests were instituted to «measure»
teacher «effectiveness».
In the example of the failed
test, maybe he makes a written chart about schoolwork, and sits with you to
do it every night, and asks the
teacher for extra credit work to
do, etc..
«If you
do good on a
test, one
teacher gives you a Kit Kat bar.
Although it can be hard to watch your child
do poorly on a
test he didn't study for or lose out on an opportunity because he didn't put in the effort, those consequences can be some of life's greatest
teachers.
These include homework - free weekends like the one coming up over Thanksgiving break, encouraging
teachers to economize on assignments by, for instance, assigning fewer practice problems in math (10 can serve just as well as 25), and creating a centralized homework calendar that will allow
teachers to coordinate big assignments, so that kids don't end up with a lot of
tests or projects due on the same day.
Chicago
teachers don't like the hot new trend of rating
teachers by how much their students improve on standardized
tests.
And yet those
teachers, according to Jackson's calculations, were
doing more to get their students to college and raise their future wages than were the much - celebrated
teachers who boosted students»
test scores.
If a
teacher objects to things like more time on
tests or lessened workload because they give an unfair advantage, ask if there's some extra credit work your child could
do in an area of strength to compensate for that.
Don't blame the
teacher for standardized
tests or school rules.
Her
teacher didn't blink at blood
tests, didn't quibble when I mentioned hypos, didn't act in any way that made me think my daughter wouldn't be in the best of care.
If you speak with her
teacher and you both feel that her inattentiveness in class could be related to attention deficit disorder rather than an inability to
do the work, than you should speak to the school's guidance counselor and get a referral to a child psychologist who can conduct
testing to rule out ADD.
The latest fight between the Buffalo
Teachers Federation and Buffalo Public Schools is heating up, this time over incentives like ice cream socials to persuade kids to take state - mandated
tests and threats of punishment for those who don't.
«The
test scores don't always tell the true measure of a
teacher's efforts.»
Nolan said the measure
does not preclude individual school districts from using the
test score results as part of their
teacher evaluations, if everyone at the school agrees.
Didn't he cave in a couple of years ago after taking thousands of dollars from NYSUT and vote with a «heavy heart» for a budget that included changes in the
teacher evaluation law that quite severely tied
teacher ratings to
test scores?
We need to bring common sense to Common Core because New York is wasting too much time and money stressing children out to prepare for these
tests which are of questionable educational value instead of focusing on supporting
teachers so they can
do their job and teach children what's really important,» said Assemblyman Jim Tedisco, a former public school special education
teacher and guidance counselor.
«There's a simple
test that we're going to apply to anything that he
does... any proposal, and it is this:
does it repeal the Last In, First Out law that would allow the city to layoff
teachers based on merit this year?»
The NASUWT the largest
teachers» union has advised members that they should have nothing to
do with alternative arrangements for
testing in the light of some headteachers» plans to boycott the Key Stage 2 SATs.
If you were a local school board member would you like to enter into a
teacher removal legal proceeding knowing (1) Pearson's
tests are flawed, (2) NYSED's use of
test results is inappropriate, and (3) major professional groups like the American Statistical Association have stated that value added measures can
do great harm?
«Trusting
teachers and freeing them up from the daily grind of targets,
testing and inspections that change as often as the weather will ensure that there is more time spent on what
teachers do best, providing a stimulating and fulfilling experience for all our youngsters ensuring success and interest in the classroom and beyond»
The letter, written by a top Cuomo aide, says the student
test scores are «unacceptable,» and asks Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch and outgoing Education Commissioner John King what to
do about an evaluation system that rates just 1 percent of all of the
teachers in the state as poorly performing.
New York State United
Teachers, a powerful statewide union, denounced the tests last April, claiming that teachers and students did not have enough time or resources to
Teachers, a powerful statewide union, denounced the
tests last April, claiming that
teachers and students did not have enough time or resources to
teachers and students
did not have enough time or resources to prepare.
Billy Easton, with the pro school funding group Alliance for Quality Education, says he doesn't think the boycotts will end and the controversy will subside until the
teacher reviews are less dependent on the
tests.
«We don't need to use the
testing instrument in the way it's being utilized: to rank and sort
teachers and kids.
«The
testing is never for the purpose of playing gotcha with kids, gotcha with
teachers, frustrating parents, frustrating communities, but we nee to have a benchmark by which to know how are students are
doing in different settings,» said Tish.
While the number of children who skipped the
tests in 2017 was 19 percent, down 2 percentage points from 2016, Pallotta doesn't believe the opt - outs will truly end until parents and
teachers are satisfied with the changes.
One critic said the governor's program would
do little to slow the «opt out» movement unless the Democrat de-emphasized the use of student
test scores to evaluate schools and
teachers.
«It's trying to confuse people, but it doesn't substantially change anything,» said Diane Venezia Livingston, a mother of three and founder of Port Washington Advocacy for Public Education, a group that opposes tying
test scores to
teacher evaluations.
He also accused the governor of «demonizing»
teachers and «moving down the wrong path» on standardized
testing, though Cuomo has recently
done an about - face on that issue, most notably calling — through his latest reform task force — for a moratorium on linking
test results and
teacher performance evaluations.
More than 200
teachers and principals received erroneous scores from the state on a contentious measurement that ties their performance to how well their students
do on
tests, according to state documents obtained by The New York Times.
«I don't want
teachers forced to teach to the
test just to keep their jobs,» she said.
The state began
testing third through eighth graders on the more difficult material last April, despite protests from unions and
teachers that schools
did not have the resources or time to prepare.
«We're telling kids that the
tests don't matter; we're now going to not count it against the
teachers, which is the right thing to
do, but... why are we continuing with
tests that are this problematic?»
I don't want 50 percent of the
teacher score, as Regents Cashin pointed out, we're not even sure these
tests can be used for that purpose,» O'Malley said.
«Most
teachers do not teach
tested subjects and the state must now spend many millions of dollars to
test teachers of the arts, early elementary grades, physical education, and high school subjects,» she said.
Carl Korn, spokesman for New York State United
Teachers, the state's largest
teacher union, said the agency must fully repair damage
done by an over-reliance on invalid and inaccurate
tests.
Cuomo took an aggressive position during his budget and policy address Wednesday, threatening to withhold a significant funding increase for schools if lawmakers don't approve his controversial reform proposals, such as an amendment to the state's
teacher - evaluation system that would increase the ratings» reliance on standardized
testing.
Despite Tuesday's implicit message that
teachers are doing OK, the state's major teachers union, New York State United Teachers, repeated its call for a moratorium and reiterated its criticism that the Regents are overly focused on test scores for both students and t
teachers are
doing OK, the state's major
teachers union, New York State United Teachers, repeated its call for a moratorium and reiterated its criticism that the Regents are overly focused on test scores for both students and t
teachers union, New York State United
Teachers, repeated its call for a moratorium and reiterated its criticism that the Regents are overly focused on test scores for both students and t
Teachers, repeated its call for a moratorium and reiterated its criticism that the Regents are overly focused on
test scores for both students and
teachersteachers.
He said some
teachers reported running from desk to desk throughout the
test to fill in bubbles for students who didn't know how.
The effort comes even though the
tests don't affect students» records and a moratorium was agreed to last year on Gov. Cuomo's attempt to tie the results to a
teacher evaluation system.
Other issues on Carranza's agenda will be what to
do about dozens of failing schools in New York City, the debate over
testing, the question of how to attract the best
teachers and what
teachers are lacking in their current contracts.
«I
do not think that any head
teacher in a primary school will find that attractive, or in any way think that this is an encouragement for the NUT or the NAHT to call off their campaign against the current national curriculum
testing structure.