Sentences with phrase «does political language»

Does political language engender public engagement or does it alienate and turn people away?

Not exact matches

Bearing in mind the relatively loose language of the ToR (see definition of «environmental effect» above) and that environmental assessment (EA) is a simply a process for decision - making that does not dictate any particular result, why not consider the GHGs associated with increased oil production and avoid what could be a crucial political and legal objection to the NGP?

So did the Spanish in what is still called Latin America, the British in India, and in modern times and with different language, the Allies in Germany, all of whom were able to build new political orders not just because they invaded, but because they stayed, and they convinced the conquered people.

You have argued that Christians (along with other believers) have every right to make religious arguments in the public sphere — that they don't need to turn to some neutral, universally rational language before they engage in political debate.

Bush spoke entirely in the language of diplomatic negotiation and political advocacy, as Ahmadinejad also largely did.

When does language move from political robustness to offensive insults and then through to anti-semitic discourse?

There are lot of political parties in India, which do canvas based on their caste / language / religion.

It is almost inconceivable that a political party in Britain should use this type of language, which does nothing less than paint a picture of class war.

He does away with the contriving language of political correctness (particularly in regards to Muslims, Mexicans, immigrants, etc.) in an attempt to convince the electorate that he, in fact, «speaks true;» he engages in rhetoric that is, according to Senator Marco Rubio, «language that is deliberately offensive in order to drive media narrative.»

What ideologies do, then, is to try and harness the meaning of political language — concepts like freedom, justice and equality — in order to motivate action.

United by monarchy, history, language, heritage and political tradition, we have much more in common with, say, a Canberran or a Torontonian than we do with an Athenian or a Roman.

We kill, exploit, back bite and betray each other simply because this particular person is not from my country or that particular person does not speak my language or those people do not belong to my political or religious affiliation.

In 2002, a team of linguists and historians argued that the script did not represent language at all, but religious or political imagery.

I'm a single mom, US Army Veteran, and student working on my degree in Political Science, with a concentration in World Relations, and the language I'm doing for my degree is going to be Chinese.

Not only does she speak the language, having been born there, she has some murky connection to the political players.

Of course a number of good films did succeed in breaking down the barriers of language and the constant need to explain them by referring to the political turmoil of the country.

And I do like Indian director Shekhar Kapur's first English - language effort, which luridly imagines the early reign of England's «virgin queen,» Elizabeth I. Splendid finery and severed heads, courtside chicanery and political assassinations — oh yes, good stuff indeed.

In the words of Peter Lauritzen it sounds like this: «He who reduces political language to difference only will come out as an individualist and social Darwinist, he who does the same with regard to equality will end up as collectivist.

Many educators and political leaders warned that the passage of Proposition 227 would be a catastrophe for the one in four California students who do not speak English as their primary language.

It opened my perspective up to the profoundly political nature of non-native language education, as well as to the importance of motivation in the classroom (beyond the trivial understanding that a driven kid will do better).

Indeed, at a time when younger Americans don't identify with Israel as earlier generations did, the establishment of a connection through language could lead to business, cultural and political connections later on.

It would be nice, however, if they did not try to appropriate the language of real political and social oppression to complain about business snafus.

Sharon Hayes, Jenny Holzer, Glenn Ligon, Adam Pendelton and Carey Young Curated by Jess Wilcox How to do things with Words explores the social and political consequences of language in contemporary society.

From an early age, it seemed that the visual world — through art and exhibitions — spoke a language that, in the political world, I at times did not grasp.

As his interest in language unfolded, so did his aim to identify socio - political problems through his art.

While traditional super PACs produce commercials that approach pancake - level flatness, wrapping political campaigns up in subtle messaging risks it being dismissed by those who aren't versed in, or don't care about, the conceptual language of the art world (see: a large portion of the American public.)

Rigg doesn't just point a finger at President Obama though, she also has words for developing nations (who need to recognize too that they need to get on board with commitments to low - carbon energy and not just stand behind historical obligations to combat climate change) and the EU (who have tried to eliminate language on fisheries reform, no doubt under domestic political pressure).

Political language, as used by politicians, does not venture into any of this territory since the majority of politicians, on the evidence available to us, are interested not in truth but in power and in the maintenance of that power.

You talk about the «political» considerations surrounding the use of such language, but don't forget the political motivations of those who object to it — the writer you linked to being a prime example.

The data firm started partnering with U.S. political campaigns around 2015 with the promise that it had the ability to do what it called «psychographic» targeting, which allowed Cambridge Analytica to create psychological profiles to «effectively engage and persuade voters using specially tailored language and visual ad combinations» that appeal to each person on an emotional level, according to Cambridge Analytica's website.