Sentences with phrase «dr lindzen»

Dr Lindzen points out how ridiculous the current arm - waving is, over the extremely * mild * natural variability of only 0.7 °C over the past century and a half:

Additionally, Eric Berger the science reporter for the Houston Chronicle moderated a debate today between Dr. North of A&M, and Dr Lindzen of MIT in Houston.

Regarding what Gelbspan claims about Dr Lindzen's wealth gained from industry payments versus Dr Lindzen's own statements, it is no surprise to see the following from Dr Lindzen near the end of this 2012 online article (full text here):

Oh, one more thing: In my July 26, 2013 blog post, I linked to a 2007 New York Times file which had Dr Lindzen's direct statements about his industry funding (or lack thereof), but some key lines from that file are worth repeating:

To say the accusation is widespread that Dr Lindzen «charges oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services» is something of an understatement, when you consider how many hits are found in an internet search for variants of it.

Would a man having Dr Lindzen's PhD - level intelligence never consider the economics of inflation, and thus never raise the rate he charges over nearly two decades?

Considering the entire «$ 2500 per day» accusation originates from Gelbspan and nobody independently corroborates it, who could blame Dr Lindzen for seeing if he could sue him?

Neither Gavin Schmidt, Michael Mann, Phil Jones, nor most of the other corrupt reprobates exposed in the Climategate emails are climatologists like Dr Lindzen.

My thanks to Dr Soon for providing Dr Lindzen's financial declaration.

Dr Lindzen of MIT, a real climate scientist says just that!

Dr Lindzen also offers some pretty compelling video's and his credentials are top notch.

RE # 12, «Dr Lindzen's dolldrums: (the only thing he constantly argues correctly is a diminishing equator to Pole temp difference slowing eveything down)»

On the other hand I like Dr Curries approach, which seem to have picked up a global trend in cyclones, but I wont be surprised if cyclone studies including hurricanes fall into Dr Lindzen's dolldrums (the only thing he constantly argues correctly is a diminishing equator to Pole temp difference slowing eveything down).

At least Dr Lindzen seems quite obstinately amused as usual.

Not exact matches

Twenty six very dull scan pages from the May 22 transcript of testimony from other expert witnesses go by before Assistant A.G. Freese shows up to question the first skeptic, Dr Richard Lindzen.

Here, rather than having a written - out guest post, Dr Soon suggested I could place two videos featuring him, followed by a specific comment question he wants to pose to his accusers, along with a statement from a fellow skeptic scientist, Dr Richard Lindzen.

If you want to Google again see Dr Roy Spencer and Prof Richard Lindzen on these negative feedbacks.

The 2 questions in the study were so innocuous that Drs Spencer and Lindzen and I would have been comfortable answering yes to them.

Not that different from measures recommended by the likes of Dr Hansen... One wonders if the rest of Lindzen's examples are as well - founded in fact?

Many of the scientists I'm sharing the pages with here have paid a high price for speaking out against Mann and his fellow Warmanos - most recently Willie Soon, whom Dr Mann's mini-me Greg Laden has been trying to get fired; and Richard Lindzen, one of those targeted by the thuggish Grijalva.

Professor David Henderson (Chairman) Adrian Berry Sir Samuel Brittan Sir Ian Byatt Professor Robert Carter Professor Vincent Courtillot Professor Freeman Dyson Christian Gerondeau Dr Indur Goklany Professor William Happer Professor Terence Kealey Professor Anthony Kelly Professor Deepak Lal Professor Richard Lindzen Professor Ross McKitrick Professor Robert Mendelsohn Professor Sir Alan Peacock Professor Ian Plimer Professor Paul Reiter Dr Matt Ridley Sir Alan Rudge Professor Nir Shaviv Professor Philip Stott Professor Henrik Svensmark Professor Richard Tol Dr David Whitehouse

Dr Richard S. Lindzen states: «If one assumes all warming over the past century is due to anthropogenic greenhouse forcing, then the derived sensitivity of the climate to a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C.»