During their domestication from their wild ancestor the wolf to the pets we have today, dogs have developed a unique ability to work together with humans.
Not exact matches
Much of what we know about how animals change appearance
during domestication comes
from a famous experiment in Siberia in the 1950s.
Xin Liu, Project Manager
from BGI, said «This study not only generates valuable genomic resource including additional wild reference genome, genome - wide variations for further studies and breeding applications on cucumber, but also gave us a better picture about how the cucumber genome evolved
during domestication.
Many of our ideas about
domestication derive
from Charles Darwin, whose ideas in turn were strongly influenced by British animal - breeding practices
during the 19th century, a period when landowners vigorously pursued systematic livestock improvement.
This suggests that restocking
from a wild population descendant
from the ancient horses occurred
during the
domestication processes that ultimately led to the modern domesticated horses.
In 1959, biologists Dmitri Belyaev and Lyudmila Trut set out to do just that, by starting with a few dozen silver foxes
from fox farms
during the Soviet era and attempting to recreate the evolution of wolves into dogs in real time in order to witness the process of
domestication.
«These associations support the hypothesis that Nosema escaped into wild populations
from heavily infected commercial colonies, at least
during the earlier years of bumble bee
domestication in the U.S.,» she said.
Wolves were domesticated more than 15,000 years ago and it is widely assumed that the ability of domestic dogs to form close relationships with humans stems
from changes
during the
domestication process.
The evidence that the SWEET4c gene was selected
during domestication was discovered by the team of Jeff Ross - Ibarra at UC Davis, while comparing SWEET4 sequences
from modern maize against its wild ancestor Teosinte.
This admixture could have occurred before
domestication or
during the early stages of the
domestication process, following restocking
from the wild as previously suggested (13, 32, 33).
Flink et al. (2014) typed the TSHR and BCDO2 loci in archaeological chicken samples
from Europe, spanning the last 2,200 years, to further examine the hypothesis of selection
during early
domestication.
The loss of genetic diversity in purebred dogs can be attributed to two major population bottleneck events: the first occurring
during domestication; and the second arising
from breed formation where the repeated use of popular sires, line breeding, breeding for specific phenotypic traits, and promotion of the breed barrier rule, contributed to overall loss in genetic variation [15 - 19].