Sentences with phrase «dynamical meaning»

12:07 AM in Agency, Art, Authorship, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Far Cry 2, Film, Game Criticism, Games, Meaning, Narrative Design, Politics, Procedural Literacy Permalink

01:15 PM in Agency, Art, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Criticism, Games, Intentionality, Meaning, Narrative Design, Procedural Literacy, Translations Permalink

06:25 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC08, Immersion, Lectures, Meaning, Travel Permalink Comments (3)

05:48 PM in Art, Authorship, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Far Cry 2, Film, Games, GDC11, Lectures, Meaning, My Games, Politics, Pop Culture, Splinter Cell, Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Permalink

01:15 PM in Agency, Art, Authorship, Dynamical Meaning, Film, Game Industry, Games, Meaning, Sports, Television Permalink Comments (12)

05:48 PM in Art, Authorship, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Far Cry 2, Film, Games, GDC11, Lectures, Meaning, My Games, Politics, Pop Culture, Splinter Cell, Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Permalink Comments (2)

02:48 PM in Agency, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Far Cry 2, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, Lectures, Narrative Design, Writing Permalink

08:43 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC09, Meaning, Travel Permalink Comments (0)

10:48 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC08, Immersion, Lectures, Meaning, Travel Permalink

02:48 PM in Agency, Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Far Cry 2, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, Lectures, Narrative Design, Writing Permalink Comments (0)

05:24 PM in Convergence, Dynamical Meaning, EDGE Magazine, Game Criticism, Game Industry, Games, Hyperrealism, Immersion, Interviews and Articles, Meaning, The Cloud, twitter Permalink Comments (5)

Dynamical means that the parts change and interact continuously.

Not exact matches

There may be reason to strongly suspect that in any sufficiently complicated dynamical system model (such as climate) with stochastic parameters (e.g., exactly when and where a lightning strike starts a major wildfire or a major submarine earthquake perturbs ocean circulation in a region or a major volcanic eruption introduces stratospheric aerosols), it is almost certain that any given run of the model will have periods of significant deviation from the mean of multiple runs.

So our point is, of course, that regardless of what mechanisms are responsible for a mean change in the Walker circulation in the AR4 simulations you've analyzed, if the simulations are not getting the dynamical mechanisms discussed in our post right, it is quite conceivable that at least the amplitude and perhaps the sign of the change in the Walker circulation is wrong, regardless of what mechanisms are responsible for the changes in the simulations analyzed.

Besides I strongly oppose (like R.Pielke and many others) the idea that the «global time average of the surface temperature» has any physical meaning or is a valid metrics to measure the «climate» and I can't see the beginning of a valid reason why it should correlate to any relevant dynamical parameter.

µ is a probability (yes a probability is (also) a measure) T is the dynamical law that our system obeys T (x) are then trajectories (orbits) of the dynamical states in X. Of course «iterating T» means following the system's states in time.

July 2016 Sea Ice Outlook predictions of Sea Ice Probability (SIP) from 5 dynamical models, the mean of the 5, and the standard deviation across the 5 SIP forecasts.

While probabilistic projections of the global mean and regional temperatures exist, process - based probabilistic assessments of large - scale dynamical systems such as the Atlantic overturning are still missing.

In general, the heuristic approaches forecast a mean September extent around 4.1 million km2, whereas the statistical and dynamical modeling approaches both suggest mean September extent near 5.1 million km2, with the dynamical modeling contributions showing a narrower range.

Indeed, it is likely that the regional patterns of past climate changes, rather than simple hemispheric or global mean temperature trends, will best inform our understanding of the dynamical mechanisms involved.

Depending on what is meant by «robust», I would venture that modern schemes for integrating the dynamical core equations in climate models are no more «robust» than in those in the NWP codes.