Sentences with phrase «e average ratio»

and 2) I also worry that the asset allocations associated with a respective 10 year P / E average ratio might introduce too much «market timing» element in to your investing approach.

Not exact matches

And the S&P 500 P - E ratio is below 17, which is the historical average.

The S&P 500's forward price - to - earnings, or P / E, ratio is a shade under 17 times right now, putting it at its lowest level since 2016 and just 11 % above its long - term average, according to BAML.

When a stock's current P / E ratio is much higher than the long - term average, it's a sign that shares have gotten overpriced.

That's why its stock trades at a P / E ratio that is 28 % below the industry average, even though its stock has jumped 45 % since June.

Over that past 20 years, the price - to - earnings ratio of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index has averaged 2.3 times the S&P 500 P / E ratio; today, the current ratio is mere 1.3 x, a 54 percent discount to its 20 - year average (according to Thomson Reuters, as of Sept. 26, 2017.)

When the iFranchise Group compared the valuation of the S&P 500 vs. the franchisors tracked in Franchise Times magazine in 2012, the average price / earnings ratio of franchise companies was 26.5, while the average P / E ratio of the S&P 500 was 16.7.

One potential way to know when a sector or industry is overpriced is when the average p / e ratio of all of the companies in that sector or industry climb far above the historical average.

For example, technology companies may sell at an average p / e ratio of 20, while textile manufacturers may only trade at an average p / e ratio of 8.

Benjamin Graham was fond of averaging profit per share for the past seven years to balance out highs and lows in the economy because, if you attempted to measure the p / e ratio without it, you'd get a situation where profits collapse a lot faster than stock prices making the price - to - earnings ratio look obscenely high when, in fact, it was low.

A forward P / E ratio typically uses an average of analysts» published earnings estimates for the next 12 mos.

This has been underpinned by strong growth in profits so that, notwithstanding the rise in share prices, P / E ratios have been declining on average.

Not least because the Shiller p / e is, at 25, well above the historical average and other market indicators (like the Q ratio) are pointing the same way.

An ETF tracking that index, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), has an average P / E ratio of 18.7.

The P / E ratio for an index is the weighted average of the price / earnings ratios of the stocks in the index.

P / E ratios are not good at identifying market tops of bottoms, however, they are associated with below - average long - term returns.

These conditions comprise the following: S&P 500 overvalued with the Shiller P / E (the ratio of the S&P 500 to the 10 - year average of inflation - adjusted earnings) greater than 18; overbought with the S&P 500 within 3 % of its upper Bollinger band (2 standard deviations above the 20 - period average) at daily, weekly, and monthly resolutions, more than 7 % above its 52 - week smoothing, and more than 50 % above its 4 - year low; overbullish with the 2 - week average of advisory bullishness (Investors Intelligence) greater than 52 % and bearishness below 28 %; and yields rising with the 10 - year Treasury bond yield higher than 6 - months earlier.

In VFC's case, that basic estimate is based on reference point price - to - earnings ratio (P / E) of 15, which is the long - term average P / E of the stock market as a whole.

The second valuation step is to compare LAZ's price to its own long - term average P / E ratio.

Even with some recent pullbacks, the P / E ratio of big U.S. companies, and the valuation of the market itself, are far above the international average.

VFC's 10 - year average P / E ratio has been 16.0 instead of 15, meaning that the market has tended to more highly value VF than companies as a whole.

That's obviously high relative to the broader market (and pretty high in absolute terms), although it's well below the stock's five - year average P / E ratio of 65.6.

The Price / Earnings (P / E) ratio is 19.07, below the 5 year average of 23.72, and well below the Insurance industry's 5 year average of 28.36.

That compares very favorably to both the broader market and the stock's own five - year average P / E ratio of 27.0, but the latter metric shouldn't really be considered due to numerous adjustments.

And the industry average P / E ratio is near 40.

The Australian price / earnings (P / E) ratio has fallen slightly since the previous Statement to around 19, which is broadly in line with its long - run average.

Yet it's still well below the stock's own five - year average P / E ratio of 23.9.

And the five - year average P / E ratio for this stock is 20.2.

The stock is trading hands for a P / E ratio of 19.6, which is obviously advantageous when compared to the stock's five - year average P / E ratio of 28.4.

The stock is available for a P / E ratio of 14.66 here, which compares favorably to the stock's own five - year average P / E ratio of 17.1 (not to mention the broader market).

The second valuation step is to compare WMT's price to its long - term average P / E ratio.

The 12 - month forward P / E ratio is now 17.9 %, which is above the 5 - and 10 - year average.

On the graph for this method, the blue fair - value line is drawn at a P / E of 17.7, which is Hasbro's average 5 - year P / E ratio.

The second valuation step is to compare Hasbro's price to its own long - term average P / E ratio.

I calculate the degree by comparing GWW's current P / E ratio to its 10 - year average P / E ratio: 16.8 / 19.0 = 0.88, or 12 % undervalued.

The average CCC (Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers) company has a D / E ratio of 1.1.

Last week, the S&P 500 Index ascended to a Shiller P / E in excess of 24 (this «cyclically - adjusted P / E» or CAPE represents the ratio of the S&P 500 to 10 - year average earnings, adjusted for inflation).

Grainger's 10 - year average P / E ratio has been 19.0 (see the dark blue box in the right panel), meaning that the market has tended to value it about 27 % higher than the historic valuation of all the companies at 15.0.

By that measure, today's P / E ratio is a bit above average, but nothing scary.

As of June 25th, 2012, the [combined / aggregate / average] P / E ratio of the companies in the S&P 500 is 13.3.

The price - earnings (P / E) ratio for the S&P has stabilised at around 30, though it remains at a level well above its long - run average of 14 (Graph 14).

The second valuation step is to compare Verizon's price to its own long - term average P / E ratio.

For comparison, the average D / E ratio for all Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers is 1.08.

The index's trailing price - to - earnings (P / E) ratio sits at around 12, significantly below the historical average of 16.

The Australian price - earnings (P / E) ratio remains around 20 (Graph 60), a little higher than its long - run average.

Its P / E ratio is in sub-10 territory against an S&P 500 average of 24, suggesting CVS is roughly 60 % cheaper than the average stock.

A stock like Alphabet (formerly Google) isn't likely owned in a value ETF due to its growth rate and P / E ratio both being higher than average.

For a mutual fund portfolio, the ratio is the weighted - average P / E of the stocks the fund holds.

The stock's price - to - earnings ratio (P / E) is relatively high, meaning that investors think Coke will continue to increase its earnings faster than the average consumer products company.

The S&P 500 price - earnings (P / E) ratio currently stands at around 30, well above its long - run average (Graph 15).