Although the revocation of a number of the EPA climate regulations is a good first step, only if and when
EF revocation occurs can the profound risks posed by climate alarmism be said to have passed in the US.
I have previously described one possible route to encouraging USEPA to undertake such
an EF revocation that I have been involved in.
Not exact matches
But it may also use up valuable time and energy needed for
revocation of the
EF prior to the end of the Trump Administration.
Revocation of the
EF would effectively revoke the CPP.
So citizens who pay electricity bills or are otherwise adversely affected by the
EF and wish to encourage
revocation can petition the USEPA to do so, preferably using evidence that EPA's three lines of evidence are invalid.
This is far from what could and should be achieved by a more activist approach in which reconsideration and
revocation of the
EF is the major EPA climate priority.