Not exact matches
Commissioner MaryEllen Elia says the revisions would change more
than half in both
math and
ELA standards.
According to the New York Times, the opt - out movement more
than doubled the number of students who did not take federally mandated
math and English Language Arts (
ELA) tests, with 165,000 kids — about one in six — not taking at least one of the tests.
Third, the student responses were more correlated with teachers» student - achievement gains in
math and
ELA than the observation scores were.
The mean coverage score is always greater
than 3, ranging from 3.07 for secondary
math teachers in Kentucky to 3.59 for secondary
ELA teachers in Texas.
The plan sets a target of 66 % of working - age New Mexicans earning a college degree or post-secondary credential by the year 2030 — a rigorous goal given the current attainment rate of 45 %.1 The plan also sets a vision for New Mexico to be the fastest growing state in the nation when it comes to student outcomes, with a goal to increase the percentage of students who demonstrate readiness to more
than 60 % on the state English language arts (
ELA) and
math assessments.2 These efforts are significant considering New Mexico's historically lower student academic proficiency rates compared to other states and to national averages3, and demonstrate how leaders are driving a sense of urgency to improve.
The observational results for pilot
ELA are more negative
than the corresponding lottery estimates, while the opposite is true for
math.
Consistent with the smaller pooled estimates for
ELA, the cohort - by - grade
ELA estimates in Panel B of Figure I are smaller and noisier
than those in Panel A for
math.
• On the PARCC this year, NPS students achieved a more
than six point gain in
ELA, a 3 point gain in
math, and especially noteworthy gains in elementary schools and Algebra.
FINDINGS Overall, the high school Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics contained fewer standards rated at DOK Levels 3 and 4
than the 2009 New Jersey high school standards in
ELA and
math.
The ever - growing question bank includes more
than 10,000
ELA questions, 23,000
math questions, 2500 science questions, nearly 2,000 social studies questions, and more.
Education Week found that Connecticut, Illinois, Vermont, and Delaware's ESSA plans «explicitly want to incorporate subjects other
than math and
ELA into either their academic - or school quality indicators.»
Further, a student who scored 330 on her grade 3
ELA assessment and 340 on her grade 3
math assessment did not necessarily do better in
math than in
ELA.
Asian charter students showed the biggest gains in English and
math scores when compared to the state average for Asian students, scoring 12 percentage points higher in
ELA than their peers and 11 points better in
math.
Last year about 60,000 - 70,000 students — or less
than 5 percent of the total — students opted out of Common Core
math and
ELA tests in the state; this year, so far, the group estimates that more
than 14 percent refused the first Common Core test.
On a whole Denver elementary students showed impressive improvement last year: the percent of students meeting or exceeding grade level expectations increased 4.7 points in English Language Arts and 2.3 points in
math; on average elementary students scored better
than 56 % of their academic peers across the state in
ELA and better
than 54 % of their peers in
math.
So, a student who scored 330 on her grade 3
ELA assessment and 340 on her grade 3
math assessment did not necessarily do better in
math than in
ELA.
But that does not equate to support for CCSS as a standard, nor does it deal with the fact that the
ELA /
math - heavy testing / accountability framework is still intact under CCSS — and more so
than ever.
This is not entirely unexpected: educators were expecting that some students would find
math especially challenging because Common Core
math requires more
ELA proficiency
than California's old standards.4 But it does suggest that, as measured in the first year of the SBAC, high - need students have farther to go — perhaps further
than the old standards and assessments indicated.
More
than two - fifths (44 percent) of districts that were high performers on the
ELA portion were also high performers on the CST
ELA and in SBAC
math.
More
than half of the districts with performance that was worse
than expected on the SBAC
ELA also fared poorly on the SBAC
math (52 %).
Using our new tools for measuring instructional content, we have found that elementary
math and high school
ELA teachers are providing instruction that is better aligned to the new standards in their state
than are elementary
ELA teachers and high school
math teachers.
As a result, the test score gaps between high - need students and white students are larger on the SBAC
than they were on CST for both
math and
ELA (Figure 1).3 In particular, the gap in
math between EL students and white students was 80 percent on the SBAC, compared to 38 percent on the CST — in other words, the share of EL students who met the standard for the SBAC was 80 percent lower
than the share of white students who met those standards.
«Despite serving a much higher need population
than the state as a whole, charters outperformed the state averages in both
ELA and
math, and eclipsed the state in terms of percentage points increased in both subjects.
Georgia pulled out when PARCC announced costs of new, computer - delivered summative
math and
ELA tests alone totaled $ 2.5 million more
than its existing state assessment budget.
Since 2015, NPS has seen greater gains in grades 3 - 11 in both English / language arts (
ELA) and
math than statewide gains for the same time period, with an 8.7 percent improvement in
ELA and a 5.3 percent increase in
Math.
[1] We focused on
ELA rather
than mathematics because some research indicates that the CCSS are more different from previous state standards in
ELA than in
math (Porter, McMaken, Hwang, & Yang, 2011).
That is significantly better
than the average of the neighborhood public schools — at 11.4 percent, 24 percent and 3.4 percent proficiency for
math,
ELA and science — but they are not, even Woodward admits, good.
More specifically, «
ELA [English / language arts] teachers were more
than twice as likely to be rated in the top performance quintile if [nearly randomly] assigned the highest achieving students compared with teachers assigned the low - est achieving students,» and «
math teachers were more
than 6 times as likely.»
During the same period, the school increased its African American proficiency rates by more
than 20 % in
ELA and 30 % in
math.