Sentences with phrase «ersst.v3b sea surface temperature data»

In the new study, the researchers searched for such events recorded in sea surface temperature data recorded as far back as 1900 and in satellite data since 1982.
Hurricanes are powered by energy pulled out of warm seawater, so sea surface temperature data collected by satellites is fed into forecast models to estimate their intensity.
They combined previously - collected penguin population data from 1982 to 2014 with sea surface temperature data from satellites, ships and buoys for the same time period.
To develop the model, they compared historic fire data from NASA's Terra satellite with sea surface temperature data in the tropical Pacific and North Atlantic oceans from buoys and satellite images compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sea surface temperature data since 1882 document large El Niño - like patterns following four out of five big eruptions: Santa María (Guatemala) in October 1902, Mount Agung (Indonesia) in March 1963, El Chichón (Mexico) in April 1982 and Pinatubo in June 1991.
Second, that hypothesis is not supported by NOAA's satellite - era sea surface temperature data or by NOAA's ocean heat content data since 1955.»
And of course the new paper by Hausfather et al, that made quite a bit of news recently, documents how meticulously scientists work to eliminate bias in sea surface temperature data, in this case arising from a changing proportion of ship versus buoy observations.
As I wrote, sea surface temperature data show warming.
The 2005 Jan - Sep land data (which is adjusted for urban biases) is higher than the previously warmest year (0.76 °C compared to the 1998 anomaly of 0.75 °C for the same months, and a 0.71 °C anomaly for the whole year), while the land - ocean temperature index (which includes sea surface temperature data) is trailing slightly behind (0.58 °C compared to 0.60 °C Jan - Sep, 0.56 °C for the whole of 1998).
Dr. Curry mentioned the OISST sea surface temperature data product, which is produced by NOAA.
In a study published in the journal Nature the researchers say analysis of sea surface temperature data shows that the AMOC has slowed down by roughly 15 % since the middle of the 20th century, with human - made climate change a prime suspect.
In our analysis we use eight well - known datasets: 1) globally averaged well - mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface temperature data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions.
And for the period of 1997 to 2012, there are no similarities between the warming and cooling patterns for lower troposphere temperatures over the oceans and the satellite - enhanced sea surface temperature data.
Of course, if the Sea Surface Temperature data was adjusted specifically so that it better matched the land station data, then you can't then use that adjusted data to claim the land station data is reliable!!!
As a result, directly comparing the Sea Surface Temperature data from the early 20th century to the current Sea Surface Temperature data is like «comparing apples and oranges» — there have been too many changes in the data sources for such comparisons to have much meaning.
The Sea Surface Temperature data is undoubtedly an important data source.
One is the HADISST sea ice and sea surface temperature data set from the Hadley Centre (which also covers the southern hemisphere), the other is from Kinnard et al. (2008).
with corresponding sea surface temperature data, will be downloaded and plotted.
All the models had access to the same sea surface temperature data, so Trenberth's temperature anomalies were never a critical factor that could explain model differences.
Some day I'll figure out why the climate science community insists on using abstract forms of sea surface temperature data as indices, like the PDO, when detrending the sea surface temperatures of the KOE (which dominate the North Pacific) would provide the same basic information (only inverted) and would be less confusing for most persons.
For more than 3 1/2 years, I've been presenting how sea surface temperature data indicates that ENSO is the primary cause of the warming of the past 3 decades.
A more thorough accounting of this effect has been implemented in the Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature data set version 4.
The AMO is detrended North Atlantic sea surface temperature data.
The paper discusses four different sets of data on satellite atmospheric monitoring (all producing slightly different end products), two radiosonde data sets (from UK Hadley Centre and University of Vienna, both adjusted for inhomogeneities — and that opens another can of worms), four different surface temperature data sets (based on reconstructed sea surface temperature data sets from Hadley Centre, again, and Climate Research Unit).
To obtain the «best possible» initial ice - ocean conditions for the forecasts, we conducted a retrospective simulation using PIOMAS that assimilates satellite ice concentration and sea surface temperature data.
Using just the data since 1970, when — according to the authors — sea surface temperature data is more accurate, the correlation is an impressive 0.97.
Now, Stephen Briggs from the European Space Agency's Directorate of Earth Observation says that sea surface temperature data is the worst indicator of global climate that can be used, describing it as «lousy».
While derived from sea surface temperature data, the PDO index is well correlated with many records of North Pacific and Pacific Northwest climate and ecology, including sea level pressure, winter land — surface temperature and precipitation, and stream flow.
Starting with their January 2013 update, it uses NCDC ERSST.v3b sea surface temperature data.
Keep in mind, when reading Smith et al (2008), that the NCDC removed the satellite - based sea surface temperature data because it changed the annual global temperature rankings.
This is likely caused, in part, by GISS masking sea surface temperature data in the polar oceans and replacing it with land surface air temperature data, which is naturally more volatile.
Moreover, taking the proxy sea surface temperature data for the peak Eocene period (55 — 48 Myr BP) at face value yields a global temperature of 33 — 34 °C (fig. 3 of Bijl et al. [84]-RRB-, which would require an even larger CO2 amount with the same climate models.
A study published Wednesday in Science Advances confirms once again that there was no global warming hiatus or cooling period during the past 20 years, an idea that had previously been raised in earlier assessments of sea surface temperature data.
Pictured above is the East Coast of the United States, in grey, with the Gulf Stream, in yellow and orange, revealed through Sea Surface Temperature data (SST), made from the MODIS instrument on the Terra satellite.
Since you insist on discussing sea surface temperatures, here's a comparison of the data you presented versus the sea surface temperature data for the Pacific Ocean if you had entered the fields correctly.
The topic of discussion is the sea surface temperature anomalies of the Pacific Ocean (60S - 65N, 120E - 80W) for the past 19 years, using the Reynolds OI.v2 sea surface temperature data.
The authors use a sea surface temperature data set that has been corrected for biases in sea surface data that arise due to the difference in measurements from ships and buoys, and the authors incorporate a much larger amount of data from land - based observations.
For the «2013 as observed» experiment, the atmospheric model uses observed sea surface temperature data from December 2012 to November 2013 from the Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) dataset (Stark et al. 2007; Donlon et al. 2012) and present day atmospheric gas concentrations to simulate weather events that are possible given the observed climate conditions.
(In effect, just as you will see people plot the raw sea surface temperature data and incorrectly attribute all the change in the region to «AMO», you've tracked the raw surface temperature change, and others are incorrectly attributing the entire effect to «global warming».)
The historical sea surface temperature data needs expanding and cleaning up.
The NCEP / NCAR Reanalysis is the database the researchers drew upon for information about the effects of troposphere humidity, wind shear and zonal stretching deformation on hurricane intensity; sea surface temperature data came from a different database.
The study compares detailed daily observations of cloud cover from Japan's GMS - 5 Geostationary Meteorological Satellite with sea surface temperature data from the U. S. National Weather Service's National Centers for Environmental Prediction over a 20 - month period (January 1998 to August 1999).
In other words, their current analysis uses sea surface temperature data and they present two different datasets.
In this post, in response to the SkepticalScience animation called the Escalator, I've simply extended that explanation to global land + plus sea surface temperature data.
Cloud amount data, sea surface temperature data, ocean heat content data, trade wind strength and direction data, ocean current data, thermocline depth data, etc., all confirm the processes of ENSO.
As shown in the above linked essay, there is nothing in the ocean heat content data or satellite - era sea surface temperature data to indicate that manmade greenhouse gases have had any impact on the warming of the global oceans.
Notice also that the East Pacific sea surface temperature data hasn't warmed over the 31 years of that dataset, based on the linear trend.
that the satellite - era sea surface temperature data indicate sea surface temperatures warmed naturally in response to the naturally created warm water released from below the surface of the tropical Pacific during strong El Niños, and
Therefore, in contrast to the Jones et al. (2001) global land - surface air temperature data, the global land and sea surface temperature data are not a simple average of the hemispheres.
Ocean Heat Content data and satellite - era sea surface temperature data also indicate the oceans warmed naturally, but you have to understand that ENSO works as a recharge - discharge oscillator (with La Niña as the recharge mode and El Niño as the discharge mode) to see Mother Nature's handiwork.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z