The performance for the 10 month moving average system within the 4
ETF permanent portfolio is below.
The results for a 10 month moving average system on the 8
ETF Permanent portfolio are below (2008 - present).
The results for a 10 month moving average system on the 8
ETF Permanent portfolio are below (2008 - present).
The performance for the 10 month moving average system within the 4
ETF permanent portfolio is below.
Not exact matches
Hypothetical
portfolios include Ivy Portfolios, ETF Portfolios, High Yield Dividend Champions, Graham Value Stocks, Dual ETF Momentum Portfolios, and Permanent P
portfolios include Ivy
Portfolios, ETF Portfolios, High Yield Dividend Champions, Graham Value Stocks, Dual ETF Momentum Portfolios, and Permanent P
Portfolios,
ETF Portfolios, High Yield Dividend Champions, Graham Value Stocks, Dual ETF Momentum Portfolios, and Permanent P
Portfolios, High Yield Dividend Champions, Graham Value Stocks, Dual
ETF Momentum
Portfolios, and Permanent P
Portfolios, and
Permanent PortfoliosPortfolios.
I've often considered the practicality of implementing the
Permanent Portfolio (25 % each of shares, gold, short gilts and long gilts) using direct bond holdings, but in the end I think you would be better off using
ETFs or funds.
These are not the only
ETFs which could be used to replicate Browne's
Permanent Portfolio.
I created a second Harry Browne
Permanent ETF Portfolio in
ETF Replay and then used their platform to test the results.
Earlier this week I proposed a 14
ETF portfolio intended to replicate the popular Permanent Portfolio mutual fun
portfolio intended to replicate the popular
Permanent Portfolio mutual fun
Portfolio mutual fund, PRPFX.
In response to my Harry Browne
Permanent ETF Portfolio article from last week, David Jackson of Seeking Alpha wondered if the portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets ETFs as opposed to US
Portfolio article from last week, David Jackson of Seeking Alpha wondered if the
portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets ETFs as opposed to US
portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets
ETFs as opposed to US equities.
Last week I detailed an
ETF portfolio (part 1 and part 2) intended to mimic PRPFX, the Permanent Portfolio mut
portfolio (part 1 and part 2) intended to mimic PRPFX, the
Permanent Portfolio mut
Portfolio mutual fund.
When we compare the 8
ETF portfolio to a 50/50
portfolio consisting of 50 % SPY and 50 % AGG, we see that the
Permanent 8
portfolio significantly outpaced a 50/50
portfolio since 2008 with about the same volatility:
Finally, what if we simply purchased the 2
ETFs with the strongest momentum within the
Permanent 8
ETF portfolio?
I read on World Beta the other day that Global X had filed for a
Permanent Portfolio ETF.
I created an «
Permanent ETF Portfolio» using ETFReplay.com.
Two «one - stop» options presently exist, the
Permanent Portfolio Mutual Fund (PRPFX) and the Global X
Permanent ETF (PERM).
Another alternative is to hold a mutual fund or
ETF that replicates the entire
Permanent Portfolio strategy.
Creating a
Permanent ETF Portfolio Building a
Permanent ETF Portfolio, Part 2 Tactical Applications of the
Permanent Portfolio Testing a Harry Browne
Permanent ETF Portfolio
The strategy's performance since inception is below, as is comparative performance of the SPDR S&P 500
ETF (SPY), iShares Growth Allocation (AOR), and the
Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX):
I created a second Harry Browne
Permanent ETF Portfolio in
ETF Replay and then used their platform to test the results.
In response to my Harry Browne
Permanent ETF Portfolio article from last week, David Jackson of Seeking Alpha wondered if the portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets ETFs as opposed to US
Portfolio article from last week, David Jackson of Seeking Alpha wondered if the
portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets ETFs as opposed to US
portfolio had been tested with Emerging Markets
ETFs as opposed to US equities.
Today, the strategy has gained a following among do - it - yourself investors, since it's easy to build and maintain a
Permanent Portfolio with
ETFs.
I then decided to add a twist to my hypothetical «
Permanent ETF Portfolio».
Earlier this week I proposed a 14
ETF portfolio intended to replicate the popular Permanent Portfolio mutual fun
portfolio intended to replicate the popular
Permanent Portfolio mutual fun
Portfolio mutual fund, PRPFX.
My expectation was that the
portfolio drawdown and volatility would be reduced, since the «Permanent ETF Portfolio» had a drawdown of -26.52 % (still significantly better than SPY's 51.88 % over the same period) and volatility o
portfolio drawdown and volatility would be reduced, since the «
Permanent ETF Portfolio» had a drawdown of -26.52 % (still significantly better than SPY's 51.88 % over the same period) and volatility o
Portfolio» had a drawdown of -26.52 % (still significantly better than SPY's 51.88 % over the same period) and volatility of 12.1 %.
The strategy's performance since inception is below, as is comparative performance of the SPDR S&P 500
ETF (SPY), a balanced allocation
ETF, the iShares Growth Allocation (AOR), and the
Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX):
When we compare the 8
ETF portfolio to a 50/50
portfolio consisting of 50 % SPY and 50 % AGG, we see that the
Permanent 8
portfolio significantly outpaced a 50/50
portfolio since 2008 with about the same volatility:
Last week I detailed an
ETF portfolio (part 1 and part 2) intended to mimic PRPFX, the Permanent Portfolio mut
portfolio (part 1 and part 2) intended to mimic PRPFX, the
Permanent Portfolio mut
Portfolio mutual fund.
Finally, what if we simply purchased the 2
ETFs with the strongest momentum within the
Permanent 8
ETF portfolio?
These are not the only
ETFs which could be used to replicate Browne's
Permanent Portfolio.
However, during SPY's bull run of 2009 when it returned 26.4 %, this
Permanent ETF Portfolio returned a modest 10.7 %.