The cold hard truth is that there's little to NO SCIENTIFIC
EVIDENCE supporting the claims made by supplement companies about their testosterone boosters actually raising...
It includes much new
evidence supporting the claims I made on mismanagement of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Not exact matches
You say it's a bunch of
made up bs, but you fail to
support your
claim with any credible
evidence.
It's really entertaining to watch the tortuous mental twists and turns and dodges that John will
make to avoid acknowledging that his delusion is just that, merely another ancient superstition among many, with no
support in
evidence for its
claims.
[«While these
claims have been
made repeatedly over the last century, the truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable to cite a single piece of solid archaeological
evidence in
support of their
claims.
Consider that a «cop out» if you will, but the
evidence to
support my assertion is abundant and it is not I who am
making extraordinary
claims here.
You are
making the extraordinary
claim that you have a sky daddy, so the onus is on you to provide
supporting evidence.
Of course you are
making a positive
claim that religion is a «fairytale,» but I did not see any «
supporting evidence» of your
claim.
What's more, you
make these
claims without the first piece of
evidence in
support.
While what Julie has been sharing is very likely to be damaging to Tony's reputation, it's also clear that she's offering
evidence in
support of the
claims she's
making.
So you totally dismiss a God believed in by 1.5 billion people and
make the
claim your God is real while having exactly zero
evidence to
support your position.
If you continue to
make statements of fact regarding your beliefs, I will be forced to demand
supporting verifiable
evidence for your
claims.
You have
made arguments that immigrants do not come here wishing to be American anymore, but you offer not
evidence to
support this
claim, nor do you
support the conclusion that they remain loyal to their own country.
Too Funny, just
make up fantastic
claims with no
evidence to
support it.
Christianity has a single source - the bible - and
makes claims of fantastical events which are not
supported by physical
evidence or even non-biblical accounts.
«Founded by atheism,
claimed by atheism,
supported by atheism, and exclusively in the interests of atheism, suppressing without mercy every jot of
evidence for the divine existence, and so
making a positive rational faith in God wholly impossible, the doctrine of evolution may well be set down as not only a foe to theism, but a foe of the most thoroughgoing sort.»
What is intellectually dishonest is
making claims of «fact» in your post without verifiable
supporting evidence.
All believers have to do to
make atheists shut up, after admitting we are wrong, is to provide definitive
evidence to
support their
claims.
An inconvenient truth, you have
made this
claim a number of times without providing any
supporting evidence.
To
make these
claims without the presentation of verifiable
supporting evidence is intellectually dishonest.
this person could not respond with any
evidence to
support the
claims he
made here.
I suspect most scholars realize that when they
make a bold
claim it should be
supported by
evidence.
Standard 1.2.7 ensures consumers and health professionals can have confidence that health
claims are well
supported by scientific
evidence, and it helps consumers
make informed food choices.
There were many
claims made by «journalists» (I use that term loosely here and equally could have used the term rumour - mongers) about fees, desire of the player to come to Arsenal, willingness of the clubs to sell, etc but without substantiation / proof or any
supporting evidence, one would have to question the veracity of these stories.
There's absolutely no scientific
evidence to
support this
claim, and it doesn't
make any sense.
Although some parents
claim that lukewarm sponge baths lower the fever, there has not been any
evidence to
support this
claim and the bath may
make your child uncomfortable.
It is a rant, and nothing more, as
evidence by the wildly false
claim the author
made as to the supposed lack of
evidence supporting the
claims she is railing against.
Personally, I find it rather ironic that you're lecturing the blog author on the rigor of language, when, faced with the need to
support the
claims made by a documentary that has faced absolutely no real standards of intellectual rigor or merit (the kind of
evidence you apparently find convincing), you have so far managed to produce a study with a sample size too small to conclude anything, a review paper that basically summarized well known connections between vaginal and amniotic flora and poor outcomes in labor and birth before attempting to rescue what would have been just another OB review article with a few attention grabbing sentences about long term health implications, and a review article published in a trash journal.
In the latest action aimed at the energy drink industry, the top lawyer for the city of San Francisco has asked one major producer to provide
evidence that
supports the advertising and marketing
claims it
made for its highly caffeinated drinks.
-1 If you're going to
make such significant leaps in judgment as stated in your third paragraph, you'll need significant
evidence that
supports the
claim.
This is regardless of the fact that Mr. Ayariga and his other colleagues who
made the allegation, failed to provide any hardcore
evidence to
support their
claims.
«To
make these
claims with no
supporting evidence is wrong and muddies the water on a very important public health topic.»
For millennia, people seeking to
make a buck have
claimed that they have unlocked the secrets of romantic compatibility, but none of them ever mustered compelling
evidence in
support of their
claims.
However, research
evidence is available to
support many of the
claims made.
Bring up the relationship between iodine and thyroid disorders, and people inevitably put the gloves on and get scrappy — not just an intellectual back and forth banter,
supported by exchange of peer - reviewed scientific studies and empirically validated literature — but a throw - down, knock - out fight, where
claims are
made on the basis of anecdotal
evidence based on what so - and - so blogger said, without a single primary or secondary source citation.
The Federal Trade Commission has filed complaints against online sellers who
made health
claims for natural progesterone creams without
supporting evidence.»
There are many
claims made by Beyond Diet which are not
supported by any real
evidence.
But if you look closely at the
claims they
make to
support this, you'll see that the scientific
evidence suggesting that genetics plays the predominant role in PCOS is not necessarily the case.
Could you please share with us, the sources from which you are citing this information and refer us to the scientific
evidence that
supports the
claims you
make?
[2] Numerous health
claims have been
made concerning salt objects, but no scientific
evidence supports these
claims.
Most promising, TEAC's heavy emphasis on the obligation of teacher - education programs to produce convincing
evidence in
support of the
claims they
make about their own quality has the potential to enhance accountability in teacher education.
But even if this
claim were
supported by
evidence, the record shows that technology did not reduce teacher cost significantly enough to
make Edison profitable or to create superior student achievement.
«What they do care about is that you can argue using
evidence, that you can
make a
claim and
support it.
Educators attending this program will discover that students
making claims,
supporting claims with
evidence, constructing explanations and preparing rebuttals to argumentation is integral to science inquiry and engineering design and intersects with the Common Core for Mathematics and English Language Arts.
Ladd argues, for instance: «The
evidence simply does not
support the
claims of those who argue in favor of more parental choice and competition on the instrumental grounds that it will
make an education system significantly more productive than it would otherwise be.»
As you can see, each error requires a different instructional response and simply re-teaching what theme is or how to
support claims with
evidence will not help the learners who are
making specific types of errors:
ThinkCERCA focuses on developing students» ability to read a text and produce a written response using the CERCA framework: (1)
make Claims, (2) support claims with textual Evidence, (3) explain their Reasoning, (4) recognize Counterarguments, and (5) use language that appeals to a particular Aud
Claims, (2)
support claims with textual Evidence, (3) explain their Reasoning, (4) recognize Counterarguments, and (5) use language that appeals to a particular Aud
claims with textual
Evidence, (3) explain their Reasoning, (4) recognize Counterarguments, and (5) use language that appeals to a particular Audience.
The New Highland Academy (OUSD) inquiry group is looking specifically at students» ability to
make claims and
support these
claims with
evidence.
One of the most problematic aspects of research paper writing is that you will need a huge amount of information to
support your
claims and
make evidence - based conclusions.
Of course, you are expected to integrate your own thoughts into writing, however, every
claim you
make has to be
supported with
evidence taken from reliable sources.