Sentences with phrase «early decision applicants»

On Wednesday February 13th, two weeks after School of Art faculty submitted admissions results to be sent out to Early Decision applicants on schedule, an email was sent out by the Dean of Admissions stating simply that «As requested by our Board of Trustees, all early decision art applicants after being reviewed by our Art Admissions Committee were either deferred to be reviewed along with the rest of the regular decision pool or denied admission.

An early decision application is available; approximately 60 % of accepted students are early decision applicants.

If the Board was always planning to accept a class to the School of Art, what could possibly have been the purpose of deferring an entire round of Early Decision applicants two weeks after their acceptance letters were ready to be mailed?

The rally, well - attended by students, alumni, faculty and the extended community, was intended to create a dedicated public space of redress for current Early Decision applicants recently denied access to their admission results by the Executive Committee of The Board of Trustees.

The Albert Nerken School of Engineering Writing Supplement consists of a number of short answer questions to be completed within about one week after the application deadline (December 8, 2017 for Early Decision applicants; January 17, 2018 for Regular Decision applicants) and returned to The Cooper Union for review.

Not exact matches

Challenging the Supreme Court's order at the African Court on Human and People's Rights in Tanzania, the lawyers of Woyome said: «The contention of the applicant is that following from the earlier concurring opinion to the decision of the review bench, the court can not be said to have been impartial.»

... The ideas in one of the reports also include turning over hiring decisions to schools and starting the process early enough so that campuses are not forced into last - minute decisions from a limited applicant pool.

For Early Decision, the Hometest will be e-mailed to applicants in Mid-December.

Early Decision is available to undergraduate Architecture, Art and Engineering applicants.

The Studio Test is sent to all School of Architecture applicants via email on the same day after the online application deadline (December for Early Decision; January for Regular Decision).

There is a different Hometest for Early Decision and Regular Decision applicants.

To apply Early Decision to the School of Art, transfer applicants will select «Yes» and follow the subsequent prompts.

For Architecture applicants, the deadline to apply Early Decision for Fall 2018 is November 1, 2017 For Engineering and Art applicants, the deadline to apply Early Decision for Fall 2018 is December 1, 2017.

Transfer applicants to the School of Art may apply early decision.

After making this selection and indicating they are applying to the School of Art, applicants will see a question that asks if they are interested in applying Early Decision to the School of Art as a transfer student.

Applicants whose first choice is The Cooper Union might consider applying Early Decision.

February 20th: Current Cooper students and faculty stood together with «deferred» early - decision applicants at a rally and press conference (video) against the unprecedented top - down decision by the BOT Executive Committee to withhold the acceptance letters of students already selected by the School of Art faculty for admission.

February 13th: The Executive Committee of Board of Trustees (whose membership remains undisclosed) announced that they would be deferring all early - decision applicants to the School of Art, citing «the absence of a sustainable model for the School of Art».

Last year's early - decision applicants to the School of Art were all deferred at the last minute to pressure faculty into submitting a report on revenue generation.

Since the decision to invest in clean energy technology is frequently impacted by many site specific factors, we recommend that applicants get started by talking with at least three different vendors early in the process.

In the earlier Massachusetts case, the SJC emphasized that its decision in favor of applicant Ross E. Mitchell was confined to the unique circumstances of his case.

The Federal Court of Appeal recognized this power in 1989 in its decision in Kahlon v. MEI [1989] FCJ no. 104, when, citing from Justice Thurlow in an earlier decision, it held that the issue was not whether the decision made by a visa officer that an applicant was in a prohibited class (inadmissible) was correct but whether the person was in fact one of the prohibited class.

Note in the earliest decision, the hospital is the applicant and the parents the respondents.

«The only - real issue for the Court to decide is whether the applicant's applied - for trademarks are likely to be confusing with the respondent's asserted VS marks,» said Manson, in the decision issued earlier this month.